Feedback
6
9
5
7
| Jogador | K | D | A | K/D | HS | ADR | KAST | Aval | Prec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
snatchie
Michał Rudzki
|
26 | 17 | 1 | 1.53 | 15% | — | — | — | 55% |
leman
Eryk Koceba
|
21 | 19 | 8 | 1.11 | 38% | — | — | — | 15% |
|
Furlan
Damian Kisłowski
|
17 | 22 | 6 | 0.77 | 53% | — | — | — | 19% |
|
phr
Tomasz Wójcik
|
11 | 19 | 5 | 0.58 | 36% | — | — | — | 28% |
|
jedqr
Grzegorz Jedras
|
11 | 19 | 4 | 0.58 | 36% | — | — | — | 16% |
| Jogador | K | D | A | K/D | HS | ADR | KAST | Aval | Prec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Prism
Wojciech Zięba
|
27 | 18 | 3 | 1.5 | 52% | — | — | — | 17% |
|
Luz
Maciek Bugaj
|
26 | 14 | 5 | 1.86 | 50% | — | — | — | 16% |
|
GruBy
Dominik Swiderski
|
20 | 17 | 5 | 1.18 | 45% | — | — | — | 25% |
|
Sidney
Patryk Korab
|
12 | 21 | 8 | 0.57 | 42% | — | — | — | 26% |
|
M4tthi
Mateusz Szambelan
|
11 | 16 | 7 | 0.69 | 9% | — | — | — | 28% |
11
4
5
1
| Jogador | K | D | A | K/D | HS | ADR | KAST | Aval | Prec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
snatchie
Michał Rudzki
|
28 | 6 | 5 | 4.67 | 36% | — | — | — | 36% |
|
phr
Tomasz Wójcik
|
14 | 9 | 3 | 1.56 | 50% | — | — | — | 24% |
|
leman
Eryk Koceba
|
14 | 9 | 3 | 1.56 | 64% | — | — | — | 12% |
|
jedqr
Grzegorz Jedras
|
13 | 12 | 4 | 1.08 | 69% | — | — | — | 12% |
|
Furlan
Damian Kisłowski
|
7 | 14 | 2 | 0.5 | 57% | — | — | — | 16% |
| Jogador | K | D | A | K/D | HS | ADR | KAST | Aval | Prec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Prism
Wojciech Zięba
|
16 | 14 | 2 | 1.14 | 44% | — | — | — | 19% |
|
Sidney
Patryk Korab
|
10 | 14 | 5 | 0.71 | 40% | — | — | — | 13% |
|
Luz
Maciek Bugaj
|
9 | 20 | 5 | 0.45 | 56% | — | — | — | 20% |
|
GruBy
Dominik Swiderski
|
8 | 15 | 3 | 0.53 | 50% | — | — | — | 30% |
|
M4tthi
Mateusz Szambelan
|
7 | 13 | 1 | 0.54 | 43% | — | — | — | 32% |
11
4
5
2
| Jogador | K | D | A | K/D | HS | ADR | KAST | Aval | Prec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
jedqr
Grzegorz Jedras
|
30 | 9 | 6 | 3.33 | 57% | — | — | — | 13% |
|
Furlan
Damian Kisłowski
|
17 | 15 | 3 | 1.13 | 71% | — | — | — | 18% |
|
snatchie
Michał Rudzki
|
16 | 12 | 3 | 1.33 | 44% | — | — | — | 36% |
|
phr
Tomasz Wójcik
|
14 | 12 | 6 | 1.17 | 57% | — | — | — | 17% |
|
leman
Eryk Koceba
|
13 | 14 | 5 | 0.93 | 54% | — | — | — | 13% |
| Jogador | K | D | A | K/D | HS | ADR | KAST | Aval | Prec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
M4tthi
Mateusz Szambelan
|
18 | 16 | 1 | 1.13 | 17% | — | — | — | 34% |
|
GruBy
Dominik Swiderski
|
16 | 18 | 1 | 0.89 | 31% | — | — | — | 29% |
|
Prism
Wojciech Zięba
|
11 | 18 | 1 | 0.61 | 45% | — | — | — | 13% |
|
Luz
Maciek Bugaj
|
9 | 19 | 3 | 0.47 | 44% | — | — | — | 17% |
|
Sidney
Patryk Korab
|
8 | 19 | 4 | 0.42 | 50% | — | — | — | 13% |
| Jogado em | 14 outubro 2022, 14:01 (há 3 anos) |
|---|---|
| Torneio | 2022 ESL Challenger League Season 42 Europe Relegation, Suporte, bo3 |
| Resultado | AGO Esports 2:1 Ungentium — vitória de AGO Esports |
| Resultados por mapa | Ancient 11:16 (Ungentium) · Mirage 16:5 (AGO) · Vertigo 16:6 (AGO) |
| Veto do Mapa | Ungentium baniu Inferno · AGO baniu Nuke · Ungentium escolheu Ancient · AGO escolheu Mirage · Ungentium baniu Overpass · AGO baniu Dust2 · Vertigo (decisivo) |
| ENSI.Score antes da partida | AGO 1547, Ungentium 1321 (Alteração: AGO +7, Ungentium -7) |
| Formação da AGO nesta partida | Furlan, snatchie, phr, leman, jedqr |
| Formação da Ungentium nesta partida | GruBy, ponczek, Sidney, Prism, M4tthi |
