- T3
- CS2
- bo5
- Ended
- Duration 3h 6m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Inferno 8:13 TyLoo
- Nuke 13:9 LVG
- Ancient 13:10 LVG
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
-
Inferno
13 minutes
8:13
TyLoo won
-
Nuke
56 minutes
13:9
LVG won
1st half 10–2
2nd half 3–7
-
Ancient
47 minutes
13:10
LVG won
1st half 7–5
2nd half 6–5
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale3 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 37 | 34 | 7 | +3 | 68% | 95 | 68% | 6.97 | 8-8 | 8-7 | |
|
|
3 | 38 | 32 | 9 | +6 | 68% | 77 | 77% | 6.19 | 4-5 | 2-9 | |
|
|
3 | 36 | 32 | 11 | +4 | 42% | 72 | 78% | 6.17 | 5-3 | 4-6 | |
|
|
3 | 24 | 31 | 8 | -7 | 46% | 64 | 66% | 5.34 | 1-7 | 11-4 | |
|
|
3 | 31 | 39 | 8 | -8 | 61% | 52 | 69% | 4.92 | 3-5 | 8-9 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 47 | 36 | 14 | +11 | 60% | 121 | 80% | 7.80 | 10-2 | 4-9 | |
|
|
3 | 33 | 34 | 11 | -1 | 64% | 80 | 68% | 6.18 | 7-7 | 6-2 | |
|
|
3 | 31 | 32 | 7 | -1 | 68% | 71 | 68% | 5.66 | 3-2 | 5-5 | |
|
|
3 | 36 | 32 | 8 | +4 | 44% | 65 | 80% | 5.53 | 6-6 | 6-4 | |
|
|
3 | 20 | 32 | 5 | -12 | 45% | 44 | 69% | 4.59 | 2-4 | 3-6 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
5 | 3 | 0 | +2 | 80% | 113 | 60% | 7.94 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 24% | |
|
|
4 | 3 | 0 | +1 | 0% | 91 | 60% | 6.54 | 0-0 | 3-0 | 23% | |
|
|
2 | 4 | 0 | -2 | 0% | 49 | 80% | 4.81 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 29% | |
|
|
2 | 3 | 2 | -1 | 100% | 63 | 100% | 4.56 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 26% | |
|
|
1 | 4 | 0 | -3 | 100% | 26 | 60% | 3.81 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 16% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
12 | 2 | 0 | +10 | 58% | 182 | 100% | 10.00 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 23% | |
|
|
3 | 3 | 3 | +0 | 100% | 78 | 80% | 6.86 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 9% | |
|
|
0 | 3 | 1 | -3 | 0% | 67 | 60% | 4.39 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 14% | |
|
|
1 | 3 | 2 | -2 | 0% | 42 | 100% | 4.32 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 12% | |
|
|
1 | 3 | 0 | -2 | 100% | 43 | 80% | 4.30 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 7% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19 | 13 | 4 | +6 | 47% | 88 | 86% | 7.55 | 2-1 | 3-3 | 18% | |
|
|
19 | 14 | 3 | +5 | 68% | 82 | 68% | 7.44 | 1-2 | 2-5 | 20% | |
|
|
18 | 15 | 3 | +3 | 56% | 95 | 77% | 7.16 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 19% | |
|
|
12 | 13 | 3 | -1 | 50% | 65 | 77% | 5.55 | 1-2 | 6-2 | 20% | |
|
|
12 | 17 | 4 | -5 | 67% | 61 | 73% | 5.01 | 3-5 | 0-4 | 22% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19 | 14 | 1 | +5 | 68% | 83 | 68% | 7.39 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 20% | |
|
|
16 | 17 | 7 | -1 | 56% | 90 | 73% | 6.47 | 3-1 | 0-2 | 21% | |
|
|
12 | 16 | 2 | -4 | 50% | 72 | 50% | 5.43 | 4-4 | 1-0 | 16% | |
|
|
14 | 17 | 1 | -3 | 50% | 65 | 64% | 4.97 | 1-4 | 2-0 | 21% | |
|
|
10 | 16 | 3 | -6 | 40% | 51 | 68% | 4.96 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 15% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17 | 15 | 4 | +2 | 65% | 84 | 65% | 6.49 | 3-2 | 0-4 | 17% | |
|
|
15 | 15 | 7 | +0 | 40% | 77 | 70% | 6.10 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 23% | |
|
|
14 | 16 | 4 | -2 | 79% | 77 | 65% | 5.91 | 3-7 | 4-5 | 9% | |
|
|
18 | 18 | 4 | +0 | 56% | 65 | 74% | 5.84 | 0-0 | 8-3 | 20% | |
|
|
8 | 15 | 5 | -7 | 63% | 39 | 61% | 4.03 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 14% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21 | 12 | 5 | +9 | 43% | 86 | 78% | 7.16 | 5-1 | 4-2 | 24% | |
|
|
19 | 17 | 7 | +2 | 63% | 94 | 70% | 7.07 | 6-1 | 1-6 | 17% | |
|
|
18 | 15 | 6 | +3 | 67% | 88 | 74% | 6.27 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 20% | |
|
|
12 | 15 | 5 | -3 | 67% | 64 | 74% | 5.17 | 1-2 | 4-3 | 20% | |
|
|
9 | 13 | 2 | -4 | 44% | 39 | 61% | 4.51 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 13% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against AE, Oct 14
- Win against MRN, Oct 20
- Win against RA, Oct 21
- Win against CW, Oct 23
- Win against CW, Oct 24
- Win against ZOTIX, Oct 29
- Loss against Metz, Oct 31
- Loss against MOUZ, Nov 02
- Win against 9z, Nov 03
- Loss against Liquid, Nov 04
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other ESL ASIA matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
LIVE: Lynn Vision vs TYLOO - ESL Challenger League - Season 49 AP
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 1 year ago
- Tournament
- 2025 ESL Challenger League Season 49: Asia
- Stage
- Bracket
- Format
- bo5