- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 2h 43m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Train 14:16 FNC
- Inferno 10:13 FNC
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
FNC
Nuke
ban
-
TyLoo
Dust2
ban
-
FNC
Train
pick
-
TyLoo
Inferno
pick
-
TyLoo
Ancient
ban
-
FNC
Overpass
ban
- — Mirage decider
-
Train
Pick: FNC
71 minutes
14:16
FNC won
1st half 7–5
2nd half 6–9
OT 1–2
-
Inferno
Pick: TyLoo
61 minutes
10:13
FNC won
1st half 6–6
2nd half 4–7
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale2 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 36 | 36 | 11 | +0 | 61% | 79 | 77% | 6.42 | 8-5 | 5-11 | |
|
|
2 | 38 | 38 | 6 | +0 | 47% | 74 | 74% | 6.27 | 6-6 | 9-12 | |
|
|
2 | 34 | 40 | 14 | -6 | 62% | 81 | 72% | 6.06 | 8-7 | 8-6 | |
|
|
2 | 33 | 34 | 11 | -1 | 61% | 67 | 77% | 6.01 | 4-5 | 6-7 | |
|
|
2 | 30 | 34 | 17 | -4 | 30% | 62 | 75% | 5.43 | 0-4 | 10-7 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 44 | 32 | 16 | +12 | 30% | 101 | 89% | 7.39 | 7-5 | 7-10 | |
|
|
2 | 45 | 34 | 11 | +11 | 38% | 80 | 75% | 7.28 | 9-3 | 8-9 | |
|
|
2 | 34 | 35 | 15 | -1 | 35% | 75 | 77% | 6.18 | 4-3 | 7-9 | |
|
|
2 | 35 | 35 | 14 | +0 | 51% | 70 | 77% | 6.04 | 4-4 | 11-8 | |
|
|
2 | 19 | 38 | 10 | -19 | 47% | 43 | 68% | 4.28 | 3-11 | 5-11 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27 | 22 | 8 | +5 | 67% | 101 | 77% | 7.30 | 7-4 | 7-2 | 28% | |
|
|
20 | 17 | 5 | +3 | 65% | 75 | 73% | 6.29 | 3-2 | 2-4 | 20% | |
|
|
23 | 20 | 12 | +3 | 26% | 83 | 73% | 6.21 | 0-3 | 7-2 | 22% | |
|
|
20 | 22 | 2 | -2 | 65% | 68 | 73% | 5.89 | 3-4 | 1-8 | 23% | |
|
|
18 | 21 | 5 | -3 | 61% | 60 | 77% | 5.43 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 17% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
29 | 18 | 3 | +11 | 28% | 78 | 70% | 7.89 | 6-2 | 7-3 | 21% | |
|
|
23 | 21 | 9 | +2 | 22% | 91 | 87% | 7.05 | 3-3 | 5-8 | 23% | |
|
|
18 | 21 | 8 | -3 | 33% | 73 | 73% | 6.08 | 4-1 | 4-4 | 21% | |
|
|
17 | 22 | 11 | -5 | 59% | 70 | 77% | 5.64 | 0-2 | 7-5 | 22% | |
|
|
12 | 26 | 6 | -14 | 50% | 51 | 70% | 4.57 | 3-6 | 2-10 | 11% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18 | 16 | 4 | +2 | 28% | 83 | 74% | 6.76 | 3-2 | 8-4 | 25% | |
|
|
15 | 13 | 6 | +2 | 60% | 76 | 78% | 6.76 | 3-2 | 4-3 | 21% | |
|
|
16 | 19 | 6 | -3 | 56% | 85 | 83% | 6.60 | 5-3 | 3-7 | 18% | |
|
|
7 | 18 | 6 | -11 | 43% | 54 | 65% | 4.45 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 31% | |
|
|
7 | 14 | 5 | -7 | 43% | 35 | 78% | 4.42 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 20% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21 | 11 | 7 | +10 | 38% | 113 | 91% | 7.84 | 4-2 | 2-2 | 16% | |
|
|
18 | 13 | 3 | +5 | 44% | 69 | 78% | 6.56 | 4-2 | 4-3 | 16% | |
|
|
16 | 16 | 8 | +0 | 56% | 83 | 83% | 6.48 | 3-1 | 1-6 | 13% | |
|
|
16 | 14 | 7 | +2 | 38% | 79 | 83% | 6.32 | 0-2 | 3-5 | 19% | |
|
|
7 | 12 | 4 | -5 | 43% | 34 | 65% | 3.91 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 7% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against NEXVOID, Sep 10
- Win against DEPO, Sep 13
- Loss against Falcons, Oct 03
- Loss against 9z, Oct 04
- Loss against M80, Oct 05
- Win against B8, Oct 02
- Win against Alliance, Oct 03
- Loss against Astralis, Oct 03
- Win against Phantom, Oct 07
- Win against K27, Oct 09
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other CSAC matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
[B] CS Asia Championships 2025 - Day 2
-
[UA] Virtus.pro проти MIBR | Perfect World CS Asia Championships
-
WINNER TO PLAYOFFS! fnatic vs TYLOO - HIGHLIGHTS - CS Asia Championships 2025 | CS2
-
LOSER IS OUT! Virtus.pro vs MIBR - HIGHLIGHTS - CS Asia Championships 2025 | CS2
-
HIGHLIGHTS 👉fnatic проти TYLOO | CS Asia Championships 2025
-
ПРОИГРАВШИЙ ВЫБЫВАЕТ! Virtus.pro vs MIBR - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - CS Asia Championships 2025 | КС2
-
ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ ПРОХОДИТ ДАЛЬШЕ! fnatic vs TYLOO - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - CS Asia Championships 2025 | КС2
-
fnatic проти TYLOO | Карта 2 | PWE CAC 2025
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 11 months ago
- Tournament
- 2025 CS Asia Championships
- Stage
- Group B
- Format
- bo3