- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 1h 40m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Ancient 13:5 MOUZ
- Inferno 13:8 MOUZ
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
FaZe
Train
ban
-
MOUZ
Dust2
ban
-
FaZe
Ancient
pick
-
MOUZ
Inferno
pick
-
FaZe
Nuke
ban
-
MOUZ
Overpass
ban
- — Mirage decider
-
Ancient
Pick: FaZe
37 minutes
13:5
MOUZ won
1st half 9–3
2nd half 4–2
-
Inferno
Pick: MOUZ
46 minutes
13:8
MOUZ won
1st half 7–5
2nd half 6–3
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale2 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 33 | 24 | 10 | +9 | 45% | 103 | 85% | 7.78 | 12-2 | 2-9 | |
|
|
2 | 37 | 24 | 18 | +13 | 51% | 100 | 95% | 7.30 | 3-3 | 9-10 | |
|
|
2 | 34 | 19 | 11 | +15 | 26% | 87 | 85% | 6.91 | 2-3 | 7-7 | |
|
|
2 | 28 | 15 | 5 | +13 | 57% | 68 | 85% | 6.24 | 3-2 | 6-5 | |
|
|
2 | 22 | 23 | 11 | -1 | 55% | 62 | 85% | 5.99 | 6-3 | 8-9 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 27 | 31 | 6 | -4 | 59% | 80 | 69% | 6.04 | 2-2 | 9-5 | |
|
|
2 | 24 | 36 | 6 | -12 | 67% | 81 | 67% | 5.65 | 5-7 | 7-8 | |
|
|
2 | 20 | 30 | 8 | -10 | 70% | 67 | 67% | 5.31 | 3-6 | 5-9 | |
|
|
2 | 22 | 29 | 5 | -7 | 41% | 58 | 67% | 5.26 | 2-4 | 6-7 | |
|
|
2 | 11 | 29 | 5 | -18 | 36% | 28 | 64% | 3.89 | 1-7 | 5-9 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19 | 12 | 2 | +7 | 37% | 114 | 89% | 8.86 | 8-0 | 2-5 | 21% | |
|
|
20 | 6 | 3 | +14 | 20% | 105 | 83% | 7.94 | 1-1 | 6-1 | 19% | |
|
|
14 | 13 | 10 | +1 | 79% | 104 | 100% | 6.77 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 18% | |
|
|
14 | 7 | 4 | +7 | 43% | 75 | 78% | 6.49 | 2-1 | 3-2 | 18% | |
|
|
11 | 10 | 6 | +1 | 36% | 64 | 83% | 6.30 | 3-0 | 3-3 | 14% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
14 | 15 | 3 | -1 | 50% | 92 | 72% | 6.20 | 0-2 | 6-1 | 26% | |
|
|
13 | 15 | 6 | -2 | 69% | 92 | 67% | 6.08 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 26% | |
|
|
10 | 15 | 1 | -5 | 30% | 50 | 61% | 4.91 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 18% | |
|
|
6 | 18 | 4 | -12 | 50% | 52 | 56% | 3.70 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 20% | |
|
|
4 | 16 | 3 | -12 | 25% | 31 | 61% | 3.63 | 1-4 | 1-5 | 17% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23 | 11 | 8 | +12 | 35% | 97 | 90% | 7.76 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 18% | |
|
|
14 | 12 | 8 | +2 | 57% | 94 | 81% | 6.85 | 4-2 | 0-4 | 12% | |
|
|
14 | 13 | 8 | +1 | 36% | 72 | 86% | 6.03 | 1-2 | 1-6 | 15% | |
|
|
14 | 8 | 1 | +6 | 71% | 62 | 90% | 6.02 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 14% | |
|
|
11 | 13 | 5 | -2 | 73% | 61 | 86% | 5.73 | 3-3 | 5-6 | 16% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18 | 18 | 2 | +0 | 72% | 106 | 76% | 7.33 | 5-4 | 5-6 | 19% | |
|
|
13 | 16 | 3 | -3 | 69% | 70 | 67% | 5.91 | 2-0 | 3-4 | 23% | |
|
|
12 | 14 | 4 | -2 | 50% | 65 | 71% | 5.56 | 1-2 | 4-3 | 16% | |
|
|
7 | 15 | 2 | -8 | 71% | 46 | 67% | 4.65 | 2-2 | 1-5 | 15% | |
|
|
7 | 13 | 2 | -6 | 43% | 26 | 67% | 4.11 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 9% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against Na'Vi, Sep 18
- Loss against FURIA, Sep 19
- Win against M80, Oct 03
- Win against FURIA, Oct 04
- Win against Spirit, Oct 05
- Loss against Vitality, Aug 20
- Loss against Alliance, Sep 08
- Loss against magic, Sep 09
- Loss against Nemiga, Oct 01
- Loss against Astralis, Oct 02
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Wins: 1
Team Vitality
Loses: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other IEM matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
MOUZ vs FaZe - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - IEM Chengdu 2025 l КС2
-
Vitality vs Virtus.pro - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - IEM Chengdu 2025 l КС2
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 11 months ago
- Tournament
- 2025 Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu
- Stage
- Group B
- Format
- bo3