- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 2h 47m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Mirage 13:2 FaZe
- Ancient 11:13 PARIVISION
- Inferno 9:13 PARIVISION
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
PARIVISION
Nuke
ban
-
FaZe
Dust2
ban
-
PARIVISION
Mirage
pick
-
FaZe
Ancient
pick
-
FaZe
Overpass
ban
-
PARIVISION
Anubis
ban
- — Inferno decider
-
Mirage
Pick: PARIVISION
29 minutes
13:2
FaZe won
1st half 10–2
2nd half 3–0
-
Ancient
Pick: FaZe
50 minutes
11:13
PARIVISION won
1st half 9–3
2nd half 2–10
-
Inferno
Decider
53 minutes
9:13
PARIVISION won
1st half 6–6
2nd half 3–7
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale3 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 45 | 41 | 19 | +4 | 76% | 82 | 79% | 6.80 | 8-4 | 6-12 | |
|
|
3 | 42 | 40 | 17 | +2 | 45% | 79 | 72% | 6.43 | 7-7 | 9-9 | |
|
|
3 | 44 | 47 | 16 | -3 | 64% | 77 | 67% | 6.00 | 7-6 | 2-8 | |
|
|
3 | 42 | 41 | 15 | +1 | 52% | 78 | 74% | 5.89 | 5-11 | 13-4 | |
|
|
3 | 39 | 38 | 8 | +1 | 44% | 62 | 70% | 5.85 | 4-2 | 5-8 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 48 | 45 | 9 | +3 | 48% | 83 | 77% | 6.46 | 2-6 | 13-10 | |
|
|
3 | 45 | 41 | 17 | +4 | 42% | 75 | 77% | 6.40 | 7-7 | 15-10 | |
|
|
3 | 38 | 39 | 13 | -1 | 42% | 69 | 77% | 6.25 | 11-3 | 5-9 | |
|
|
3 | 39 | 47 | 22 | -8 | 54% | 82 | 82% | 6.20 | 5-7 | 6-19 | |
|
|
3 | 31 | 44 | 7 | -13 | 71% | 59 | 67% | 5.13 | 5-8 | 12-8 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17 | 6 | 4 | +11 | 65% | 116 | 87% | 8.13 | 1-3 | 4-3 | 24% | |
|
|
15 | 7 | 5 | +8 | 40% | 99 | 87% | 7.57 | 1-0 | 3-3 | 27% | |
|
|
13 | 6 | 1 | +7 | 46% | 71 | 93% | 6.90 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 31% | |
|
|
13 | 9 | 3 | +4 | 77% | 86 | 80% | 6.55 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 21% | |
|
|
9 | 7 | 7 | +2 | 100% | 84 | 87% | 6.45 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 21% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
11 | 14 | 1 | -3 | 45% | 77 | 67% | 6.13 | 1-1 | 2-3 | 26% | |
|
|
7 | 13 | 3 | -6 | 57% | 62 | 60% | 5.72 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 21% | |
|
|
9 | 14 | 1 | -5 | 56% | 65 | 60% | 5.52 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 23% | |
|
|
5 | 13 | 2 | -8 | 80% | 38 | 47% | 3.98 | 0-1 | 3-1 | 9% | |
|
|
2 | 14 | 3 | -12 | 50% | 28 | 47% | 2.91 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 22% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26 | 16 | 5 | +10 | 69% | 94 | 79% | 8.07 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 23% | |
|
|
15 | 15 | 6 | +0 | 47% | 70 | 71% | 6.02 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 20% | |
|
|
16 | 20 | 7 | -4 | 56% | 85 | 58% | 5.80 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 23% | |
|
|
13 | 16 | 5 | -3 | 46% | 56 | 54% | 5.26 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 16% | |
|
|
11 | 19 | 8 | -8 | 64% | 69 | 71% | 4.64 | 2-7 | 3-0 | 21% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22 | 14 | 10 | +8 | 36% | 105 | 83% | 7.66 | 4-2 | 7-3 | 22% | |
|
|
18 | 16 | 11 | +2 | 56% | 84 | 92% | 6.95 | 2-2 | 3-6 | 15% | |
|
|
18 | 18 | 5 | +0 | 61% | 90 | 75% | 6.63 | 0-3 | 4-6 | 18% | |
|
|
15 | 15 | 3 | +0 | 53% | 62 | 75% | 5.97 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 22% | |
|
|
13 | 19 | 2 | -6 | 54% | 54 | 75% | 5.37 | 4-1 | 5-4 | 12% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
12 | 18 | 6 | -6 | 50% | 75 | 64% | 6.09 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 21% | |
|
|
15 | 18 | 6 | -3 | 60% | 64 | 68% | 5.85 | 2-2 | 1-4 | 17% | |
|
|
13 | 16 | 2 | -3 | 38% | 60 | 73% | 5.77 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 17% | |
|
|
14 | 16 | 3 | -2 | 29% | 62 | 68% | 5.73 | 2-1 | 6-1 | 22% | |
|
|
10 | 18 | 7 | -8 | 70% | 68 | 73% | 5.65 | 4-1 | 3-6 | 21% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21 | 13 | 4 | +8 | 48% | 73 | 91% | 7.41 | 2-0 | 8-4 | 18% | |
|
|
16 | 11 | 7 | +5 | 25% | 82 | 91% | 6.93 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 23% | |
|
|
19 | 13 | 3 | +6 | 37% | 78 | 86% | 6.51 | 1-2 | 7-1 | 16% | |
|
|
12 | 17 | 10 | -5 | 50% | 91 | 86% | 5.84 | 1-4 | 1-11 | 25% | |
|
|
13 | 12 | 3 | +1 | 85% | 79 | 73% | 5.65 | 1-6 | 4-3 | 17% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against BetBoom, Aug 12
- Win against Legacy, Aug 13
- Loss against Vitality, Aug 20
- Loss against Alliance, Sep 08
- Loss against magic, Sep 09
- Win against 100T, Aug 14
- Loss against MOUZ, Aug 16
- Win against TyLoo, Sep 08
- Loss against FURIA, Sep 09
- Loss against magic, Sep 10
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other PGL matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
FaZe vs PVISION - HIGHLIGHTS - PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | CS2
-
FaZe vs PVISION - PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 - ROUND #3
-
NAVI vs Aurora - PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 - ROUND #3
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 7 months ago
- Tournament
- 2026 PGL Cluj-Napoca
- Stage
- Swiss Stage
- Format
- bo3