- Tier-1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- 2 hours 43 minutes
- GMT+00:00
- Mirage 8:13 (magic)
- Dust2 13:4 (Heroic)
- Inferno 6:13 (magic)
Not calculated for this match
Calculated by ENSI.Score, not reported by the organiser Calculated from ENSI.Score by the Elo formula. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
magic
Nuke
ban
-
Heroic
Anubis
ban
-
magic
Mirage
ban
-
Heroic
Dust2
pick
-
Heroic
Overpass
ban
-
magic
Ancient
ban
- — Inferno decider
-
Mirage
Halves(6:6; 2:7)
45 minutes
8:13
magic won
-
Dust2
Pick: Heroic
Halves(9:3; 4:1)
38 minutes
13:4
Heroic won
-
Inferno
Decider
Halves(5:7; 1:6)
44 minutes
6:13
magic won
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale3 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 43 | 38 | 12 | +5 | 60% | 79 | 67% | 6.19 | 1-6 | 15-7 | |
|
|
3 | 40 | 41 | 12 | -1 | 55% | 72 | 79% | 6.12 | 5-2 | 12-10 | |
|
|
3 | 37 | 39 | 11 | -2 | 54% | 75 | 74% | 6.01 | 4-6 | 7-12 | |
|
|
3 | 33 | 40 | 13 | -7 | 52% | 74 | 65% | 5.56 | 7-10 | 3-8 | |
|
|
3 | 31 | 42 | 10 | -11 | 52% | 61 | 67% | 5.18 | 6-10 | 5-11 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 49 | 34 | 11 | +15 | 41% | 87 | 79% | 7.18 | 10-4 | 6-8 | |
|
|
3 | 43 | 35 | 13 | +8 | 53% | 78 | 75% | 6.62 | 5-6 | 7-7 | |
|
|
3 | 39 | 36 | 14 | +3 | 62% | 76 | 72% | 6.14 | 7-5 | 7-2 | |
|
|
3 | 36 | 39 | 17 | -3 | 61% | 75 | 74% | 6.12 | 6-4 | 5-8 | |
|
|
3 | 33 | 42 | 12 | -9 | 58% | 70 | 70% | 5.72 | 6-4 | 7-11 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
14 | 14 | 7 | +0 | 64% | 85 | 76% | 6.46 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 26% | |
|
|
16 | 17 | 3 | -1 | 50% | 75 | 57% | 5.94 | 1-2 | 6-2 | 22% | |
|
|
14 | 17 | 2 | -3 | 36% | 72 | 57% | 5.62 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 23% | |
|
|
12 | 16 | 1 | -4 | 58% | 64 | 62% | 5.26 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 18% | |
|
|
5 | 16 | 4 | -11 | 60% | 38 | 62% | 4.01 | 1-1 | 0-5 | 20% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24 | 11 | 4 | +13 | 38% | 105 | 76% | 8.28 | 4-3 | 4-1 | 29% | |
|
|
20 | 11 | 7 | +9 | 55% | 94 | 86% | 7.61 | 1-1 | 2-3 | 18% | |
|
|
14 | 12 | 3 | +2 | 57% | 70 | 67% | 6.01 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 19% | |
|
|
10 | 14 | 9 | -4 | 60% | 74 | 71% | 5.29 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 26% | |
|
|
12 | 13 | 6 | -1 | 58% | 59 | 67% | 5.24 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 16% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18 | 8 | 4 | +10 | 72% | 101 | 82% | 7.80 | 0-2 | 6-2 | 21% | |
|
|
16 | 10 | 5 | +6 | 44% | 96 | 88% | 7.73 | 1-1 | 2-4 | 18% | |
|
|
12 | 12 | 6 | +0 | 75% | 101 | 76% | 6.38 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 19% | |
|
|
12 | 12 | 4 | +0 | 67% | 56 | 76% | 5.79 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 16% | |
|
|
10 | 12 | 7 | -2 | 40% | 73 | 76% | 5.65 | 1-3 | 0-4 | 16% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
13 | 12 | 4 | +1 | 46% | 100 | 82% | 7.28 | 4-0 | 1-2 | 22% | |
|
|
13 | 13 | 3 | +0 | 62% | 83 | 71% | 6.28 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 16% | |
|
|
10 | 16 | 6 | -6 | 60% | 82 | 71% | 5.85 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 22% | |
|
|
9 | 14 | 4 | -5 | 44% | 65 | 65% | 5.17 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 22% | |
|
|
9 | 15 | 5 | -6 | 56% | 50 | 65% | 4.91 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 20% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
16 | 13 | 2 | +3 | 63% | 99 | 74% | 6.68 | 2-4 | 5-3 | 18% | |
|
|
14 | 15 | 1 | -1 | 36% | 71 | 84% | 6.04 | 1-0 | 5-6 | 25% | |
|
|
9 | 13 | 5 | -4 | 56% | 65 | 63% | 5.03 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 21% | |
|
|
7 | 11 | 5 | -4 | 43% | 51 | 63% | 4.75 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 11% | |
|
|
9 | 14 | 2 | -5 | 56% | 48 | 63% | 4.68 | 3-4 | 2-5 | 11% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17 | 10 | 3 | +7 | 65% | 100 | 84% | 8.13 | 2-1 | 4-4 | 20% | |
|
|
14 | 10 | 5 | +4 | 64% | 88 | 79% | 7.00 | 5-2 | 3-1 | 13% | |
|
|
14 | 10 | 2 | +4 | 57% | 71 | 74% | 6.82 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 13% | |
|
|
12 | 11 | 3 | +1 | 42% | 55 | 79% | 5.87 | 2-1 | 1-5 | 18% | |
|
|
9 | 14 | 3 | -5 | 56% | 60 | 74% | 5.29 | 1-1 | 3-5 | 34% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against 1WIN, Sep 12
- Loss against VP, Sep 13
- Win against JS, Sep 22
- Win against BBL, Sep 22
- Win against FNC, Sep 25
- Win against FaZe, Sep 09
- Win against PARIVISION, Sep 10
- Loss against Alliance, Sep 10
- Loss against Vitality, Sep 17
- Loss against MIBR, Sep 18
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Wins: 1
K27
Wins: 1
-
Wins: 1
Nuclear TigeRES
Loses: 1
-
Wins: 1
3DMAX
Wins: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Match VOD
-
ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ В ПЛЕЙ-ОФФ! MOUZ vs AURORA - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - PGL Astana 2026 l КС2
-
🤖AI短剧|《七零年代:空间囤货养家》被闺蜜推下泰山,我穿越七十年代东北林区#爆款短剧 #drama #小爱推文 #甜宠#恋爱 #都市
-
LOSER IS OUT! HEROIC vs magic - HIGHLIGHTS - PGL Astana 2026 | CS2
-
女總裁身患怪病連神醫都無能為力,怎料竟被角落裏不起眼的窮小子一針治好!女總裁醒來一眼看出小夥不凡豪擲千億家產助他成功,從此人生逆襲!#短劇 #總裁灰姑娘 #窮小子逆襲#爆燃短劇KingDrama
-
ПРОИГРАВШИЙ ВЫБЫВАЕТ! HEROIC vs magic - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - PGL Astana 2026 l КС2
-
💥ENG SUB💥【神级召唤师:我统御BOSS踏碎副本】God-level Summoner: I can command the BOSS 第1-134集 #热血 #玄幻 #anime
-
🔥【強推】【Eng Sub】《神級禦獸:開局收服深淵BOSS》遊戲現實融合,林墨覺醒神級BOSS召喚師,契約養成BOSS軍團,橫推萬敵登頂五星戰將。第1-134集 #都市 #热血 #系统 #玄幻
-
街頭惡霸欲當街欺辱美女總裁,殊不知她哥哥天生神力,一個抬眸瞬間制服十大惡霸,從此為妹妹保駕護航逆襲悲慘人生!#精彩短劇#中國電視劇#男頻 #短劇 #窮小子 #女總裁 #逆襲
-
MOUZ vs Aurora - PGL Astana 2026 - Playoffs
-
HEROIC vs magic - PGL Astana 2026 - ROUND #4
-
💥入贅三年,我被許家當狗般欺辱!前妻勾結富二代,逼我下跪簽離婚協議!忍無可忍之際,我撤銷對許家的300億注資,一夜之間讓許家破產倒閉,從高高在上淪為乞討,跪求我原諒、跪地舔鞋!
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
About a Match
- Played on
- May 12, 2026, 05:00
- 4 months ago
- Tournament
- 2026 PGL Astana
- Stage
- Swiss
- Format
- bo3