- T3
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 4h 24m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Overpass 16:8 Carpe Diem
- Dust2 14:16 PA
- Inferno 16:14 Carpe Diem
1545 +17
ENSI.Score before the match
1559 −17
—
Win probabilityNot calculated for this match
—
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
Carpe Diem Ancient ban
-
PA
Vertigo
ban
-
Carpe Diem Overpass pick
-
PA
Dust2
pick
-
Carpe Diem Mirage ban
-
PA
Nuke
ban
- — Inferno decider
-
Overpass
Pick: Carpe Diem
59 minutes
16:8
Carpe Diem won
1st half 9–6
2nd half 7–2
-
Dust2
Pick: PA
77 minutes
14:16
PA won
1st half 5–10
2nd half 9–6
-
Inferno
Decider
70 minutes
16:14
Carpe Diem won
1st half 5–10
2nd half 11–4
Player statistics
3 maps with player statistics
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 70 | 58 | 12 | +12 | 43% | |
|
|
3 | 61 | 57 | 21 | +4 | 33% | |
|
|
3 | 55 | 61 | 10 | -6 | 45% | |
|
|
3 | 53 | 50 | 19 | +3 | 30% | |
|
|
3 | 49 | 62 | 17 | -13 | 63% |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 65 | 51 | 6 | +14 | 28% | |
|
|
3 | 63 | 62 | 19 | +1 | 43% | |
|
|
3 | 54 | 61 | 13 | -7 | 43% | |
|
|
3 | 53 | 60 | 12 | -7 | 38% | |
|
|
3 | 53 | 54 | 13 | -1 | 58% |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21 | 14 | 5 | +7 | 29% | 26% | |
|
|
19 | 15 | 2 | +4 | 32% | 15% | |
|
|
18 | 13 | 8 | +5 | 33% | 31% | |
|
|
17 | 17 | 10 | +0 | 53% | 29% | |
|
|
17 | 17 | 7 | +0 | 29% | 18% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19 | 20 | 1 | -1 | 47% | 19% | |
|
|
17 | 19 | 5 | -2 | 24% | 23% | |
|
|
16 | 16 | 2 | +0 | 19% | 43% | |
|
|
13 | 18 | 3 | -5 | 62% | 10% | |
|
|
11 | 19 | 6 | -8 | 64% | 19% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22 | 24 | 1 | -2 | 41% | 23% | |
|
|
19 | 18 | 2 | +1 | 53% | 25% | |
|
|
17 | 23 | 6 | -6 | 41% | 24% | |
|
|
16 | 23 | 3 | -7 | 63% | 28% | |
|
|
14 | 19 | 4 | -5 | 36% | 23% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
28 | 15 | 2 | +13 | 32% | 37% | |
|
|
22 | 18 | 6 | +4 | 59% | 18% | |
|
|
22 | 16 | 6 | +6 | 64% | 22% | |
|
|
20 | 20 | 3 | +0 | 45% | 21% | |
|
|
15 | 19 | 7 | -4 | 27% | 20% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27 | 20 | 6 | +7 | 56% | 27% | |
|
|
27 | 17 | 8 | +10 | 30% | 19% | |
|
|
21 | 18 | 7 | +3 | 24% | 32% | |
|
|
17 | 28 | 6 | -11 | 53% | 16% | |
|
|
16 | 22 | 4 | -6 | 75% | 15% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24 | 25 | 8 | -1 | 42% | 26% | |
|
|
23 | 22 | 4 | +1 | 30% | 20% | |
|
|
21 | 20 | 2 | +1 | 29% | 23% | |
|
|
19 | 21 | 4 | -2 | 37% | 21% | |
|
|
18 | 20 | 4 | -2 | 50% | 20% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Advertisement
Teams Comparison
- Win against MIGHT, May 23
- Win against MIGHT, May 23
- Loss against LAG, Jun 05
- Loss against LAG, Jun 05
- Loss against E-XL, Jun 13
- Loss against LAG, Jul 11
- Loss against LAG, Jul 25
- Loss against MIGHT, Jul 27
- Loss against TF, Aug 12
- Loss against A7, Aug 14
3 losses
Streak
6 losses
30%
Winrate 10
20%
33%
Winrate 30
33%
−3 pp
Form vs usual
last 10 against last 30, pp
−13 pp
Previous Encounters
1
Wins6 meetings
5
Teams Recent Performance
Other ECC NA matches
Advertisement
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 4 years ago
- Tournament
- 2022 ESEA Cash Cup: Spring NA #5
- Stage
- Bracket
- Format
- bo3