Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 3h 20m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Zero Tenacity
2:1
Y5 Esports
  • Game 1 36–27 kills Y5
  • Game 2 48–30 kills Z10
  • Game 3 43–13 kills Z10
1465 +14 ENSI.Score before the match 1415 −14
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 43 minutes 36–27 kills Y5 won
  2. Game 2 54 minutes 48–30 kills Z10 won
  3. Game 3 32 minutes 43–13 kills Z10 won

Player statistics

3 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
RetsuRussia 3 39 13 44 +26 30,595 116,210 815 804 / 918
StojkovMacedonia Igor Stojkov 3 37 16 50 +21 22,328 111,232 658 627 / 806
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 3 20 12 69 +8 19,566 67,280 392 486 / 724
LeBronDotaSerbia Nikola Popovic 3 19 15 70 +4 14,157 53,796 225 397 / 535
PabloSweden Axel Källman 3 12 14 72 -2 12,690 52,637 134 369 / 537
Y5 Esports
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
FTSInternational 3 27 17 18 +10 27,252 104,884 801 695 / 873
dominicRussia Ivan Zharkov 3 11 24 45 -13 20,157 61,320 585 545 / 675
tv/nemamyka 3 15 26 32 -11 18,937 78,792 491 490 / 632
alternateInternational 3 8 29 36 -21 12,372 29,576 114 344 / 525
fam0usRussia 3 8 31 39 -23 8,786 33,080 58 284 / 416

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Zero Tenacity

Y5 Esports

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Zero Tenacity Now Y5 Esports
  1. Loss against PIPS4, Sep 04
  2. Win against DYN, Sep 06
  3. Loss against Na'Vi, Sep 12
  4. Loss against 2M, Sep 21
  5. Loss against Lynx, Sep 22
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against BPS, Jan 14
  2. Win against Quantum, Apr 02
  3. Win against ACG, Apr 02
  4. Loss against Z10, Apr 03
  5. Loss against MOVE, Apr 06
3 losses Streak 2 losses
40% Winrate 10 43%
53% Winrate 30 43%
−13 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp 0 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Zero Tenacity Y5 Esports

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Zero Tenacity Y5 Esports
1 Wins1 meeting 0
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Y5 Esports 1 Game 1 — 36–27 kills — Winner: Y5 Esports; Game 2 — 48–30 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 43–13 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity

Teams Recent Performance

Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Team Lynx, Winner 2 Game 1 — 44–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 27–43 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 3 — 23–37 kills — Winner: Team Lynx
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Two Move, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 41–20 kills — Winner: Two Move; Game 2 — 42–39 kills — Winner: Two Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 BS Closed Qualifier Ended Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 37–22 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 39–10 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–27 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 12–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–46 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 24–34 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
All Zero Tenacity Encounters
Y5 Esports
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Ended One Move, Winner 2 Y5 Esports 0 Game 1 — 20–14 kills — Winner: One Move; Game 2 — 38–8 kills — Winner: One Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Y5 Esports 1 Game 1 — 36–27 kills — Winner: Y5 Esports; Game 2 — 48–30 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 43–13 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Ended Apple City Gang 0 Y5 Esports, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–31 kills — Winner: Y5 Esports; Game 2 — 18–28 kills — Winner: Y5 Esports
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Ended Quantum 1 Y5 Esports, Winner 2 Game 1 — 20–54 kills — Winner: Y5 Esports; Game 2 — 34–21 kills — Winner: Quantum; Game 3 — 17–43 kills — Winner: Y5 Esports
Dota 2 T3 bo3 ESL Raleigh Eastern Europe Ended BanyaPivoSamogon, Winner 2 Y5 Esports 1 Game 1 — 44–26 kills — Winner: BanyaPivoSamogon; Game 2 — 22–43 kills — Winner: Y5 Esports; Game 3 — 46–20 kills — Winner: BanyaPivoSamogon
All Y5 Esports Encounters

Other CCT S8 matches

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Walkover Winter Bear — End Game, Winner
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Ended Passion UA, Winner 2 RABOTYAGI 0 Game 1 — 29–25 kills — Winner: Passion UA; Game 2 — 41–19 kills — Winner: Passion UA
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Ended One Move 0 Apple City Gang, Winner 2 Game 1 — 8–29 kills — Winner: Apple City Gang; Game 2 — 25–49 kills — Winner: Apple City Gang
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Walkover Passion UA, Winner ASAKURA —
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Walkover ASAKURA — End Game, Winner
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Walkover Winter Bear, Winner ASAKURA —
All CCT S8 matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
1 year ago
Tournament
2025 CCT Series 8
Stage
Group A
Format
bo3

Login