Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 10m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Zero Tenacity
2:0
End Game
  • Game 1 30–14 kills Z10
  • Game 2 Z10
1490 +12 ENSI.Score before the match 1404 −12
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Last meeting · Apr 09, 2025 · Zero Tenacity 2:0

Maps

  1. Game 1 41 minutes 30–14 kills Z10 won
  2. Game 2 47 minutes Z10 won

Player statistics

1 map with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
RetsuRussia 1 7 2 10 +5 29,110 30,248 247 741 / 902
StojkovMacedonia Igor Stojkov 1 13 1 12 +12 25,587 33,979 221 666 / 1,003
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 1 5 2 13 +3 23,834 15,991 201 587 / 675
LeBronDotaSerbia Nikola Popovic 1 2 3 17 -1 12,944 8,272 97 373 / 554
PabloSweden Axel Källman 1 3 6 17 -3 11,892 10,455 44 311 / 578
End Game
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
NandeGeorgia 1 5 5 2 +0 24,318 22,057 236 640 / 677
w1shGeorgia Irakli Peranidze 1 2 3 5 -1 19,845 17,363 263 520 / 613
MinD_ContRoLBulgaria Ivan Borislavov 1 2 8 9 -6 15,432 12,165 149 413 / 479
SsaSpartanGreece Giorgos Giannakopoulos 1 2 6 8 -4 10,868 10,810 65 317 / 345
JeezyTurkey BERKE CAN YENIGÜN 1 3 8 10 -5 10,352 14,821 25 261 / 326

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Zero Tenacity

End Game

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Zero Tenacity Now End Game
  1. Loss against PIPS4, Sep 04
  2. Win against DYN, Sep 06
  3. Loss against Na'Vi, Sep 12
  4. Loss against 2M, Sep 21
  5. Loss against Lynx, Sep 22
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against ACG, Apr 07
  2. Win against OG, Apr 08
  3. Loss against Z10, Apr 09
  4. Loss against Z10, Apr 09
  5. Loss against HYDRA, Apr 10
3 losses Streak 3 losses
40% Winrate 10 44%
53% Winrate 30 44%
−13 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp 0 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Zero Tenacity End Game

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Zero Tenacity End Game
2 Wins2 meetings 0
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S25 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 End Game 0 Game 1 — 39–20 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 28–9 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 End Game 0 Game 1 — 30–14 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — — — Winner: Zero Tenacity

Teams Recent Performance

Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Team Lynx, Winner 2 Game 1 — 44–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 27–43 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 3 — 23–37 kills — Winner: Team Lynx
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Two Move, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 41–20 kills — Winner: Two Move; Game 2 — 42–39 kills — Winner: Two Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 BS Closed Qualifier Ended Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 37–22 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 39–10 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–27 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 12–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–46 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 24–34 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
All Zero Tenacity Encounters
End Game
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S25 Playoffs Ended End Game 0 HYDRA, Winner 2 Game 1 — 35–47 kills — Winner: HYDRA; Game 2 — 22–51 kills — Winner: HYDRA
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S25 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 End Game 0 Game 1 — 39–20 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 28–9 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 End Game 0 Game 1 — 30–14 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — — — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended End Game, Winner 2 OG 0 Game 1 — 23–30 kills — Winner: End Game; Game 2 — 35–15 kills — Winner: End Game
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended Apple City Gang, Winner 2 End Game 1 Game 1 — 15–47 kills — Winner: End Game; Game 2 — 34–19 kills — Winner: Apple City Gang; Game 3 — 33–19 kills — Winner: Apple City Gang
All End Game Encounters

Other CCT S8 matches

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended One Move, Winner 2 Passion UA 1 Game 1 — 12–26 kills — Winner: Passion UA; Game 2 — 44–18 kills — Winner: One Move; Game 3 — 34–27 kills — Winner: One Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 37–16 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 50–35 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended RABOTYAGI, Winner 2 Apple City Gang 0 Game 1 — 40–32 kills — Winner: RABOTYAGI; Game 2 — 21–12 kills — Winner: RABOTYAGI
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended Apple City Gang, Winner 2 One Move 0 Game 1 — 38–23 kills — Winner: Apple City Gang; Game 2 — 28–26 kills — Winner: Apple City Gang
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended Natus Vincere, Winner 2 RABOTYAGI 1 Game 1 — 32–39 kills — Winner: RABOTYAGI; Game 2 — 25–24 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 3 — 19–21 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Playoffs Ended Apple City Gang 1 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–31 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 27–24 kills — Winner: Apple City Gang; Game 3 — 5–20 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
All CCT S8 matches

Match VOD

Found on YouTube by the name of this match

  • Dota 2 | Zero Tenacity vs End Game | CCT S8 - BO3

    Dota 2 | Zero Tenacity vs End Game | CCT S8 - BO3

    Play & Pulse 122 views

Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
1 year ago
Tournament
2025 CCT Series 8
Stage
Bracket
Format
bo3

Login