Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 1h 53m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Pipsqueak+4
0:2
1w Team
  • Game 1 6–32 kills 1win
  • Game 2 10–31 kills 1win
1553 −12 ENSI.Score before the match 1649 +12
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Last meeting · Sep 23, 2026 · 1w Team 2:0

Maps

  1. Game 1 26 minutes 6–32 kills 1win won
  2. Game 2 28 minutes 10–31 kills 1win won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Pipsqueak+4
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
NandeGeorgia 2 2 8 8 -6 13,943 12,871 315 532 / 607
CopyGermany Philipp Bühler 2 5 9 9 -4 11,791 20,165 227 462 / 522
PalantimosBelarus Nikita Grinkevich 2 2 15 7 -13 8,764 14,804 160 349 / 402
EkkiPoland Marcel Holowienko 2 5 17 11 -12 6,995 12,948 53 303 / 355
KidaroUkraine Ivan Bondarev 2 2 16 9 -14 4,958 16,069 78 245 / 322
1w Team
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
Munkushi~Russia Nikita Chepurnykh 2 18 0 22 +18 19,529 28,386 333 711 / 715
SSSRussia Valery Lazarev 2 12 2 27 +10 16,293 35,474 310 610 / 735
squad1xRussia Ilya Kuvaldin 2 22 5 24 +17 15,873 30,258 210 598 / 647
swedenstrongRussia Georgiy Zainalabidov 2 5 5 40 +0 10,577 20,554 34 361 / 427
REINRussia Kosygin Vladislav Alexandrovich 2 6 4 40 +2 7,749 21,275 67 339 / 429

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Pipsqueak+4

1w Team

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Pipsqueak+4 Now 1w Team
  1. Loss against Aurora, Sep 19
  2. Win against YKB, Sep 20
  3. Loss against GL, Sep 21
  4. Win against Cobra, Sep 22
  5. Loss against 1win, Sep 23
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against PARIVISION, Oct 09
  2. Loss against Liquid, Oct 22
  3. Loss against OG, Oct 23
  4. Loss against GL, Oct 24
  5. Loss against Yandex, Oct 25
1 loss Streak 6 losses
40% Winrate 10 30%
53% Winrate 30 43%
−13 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −13 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Pipsqueak+4 1w Team
3 Advantage3 common opponents 3

Previous Encounters

Pipsqueak+4 1w Team
0 Wins3 meetings 3
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PGL Group Stage Ended 1w Team, Winner 2 Pipsqueak+4 0 Game 1 — 29–19 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 47–34 kills — Winner: 1w Team
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended Pipsqueak+4 0 1w Team, Winner 2 Game 1 — 6–32 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 10–31 kills — Winner: 1w Team
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLD2 S1 Playoffs Ended 1w Team, Winner 2 Pipsqueak+4 0 Game 1 — 37–7 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 33–23 kills — Winner: 1w Team
All PIPS4 and 1win Encounters (3)

Teams Recent Performance

Pipsqueak+4
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PGL Group Stage Ended 1w Team, Winner 2 Pipsqueak+4 0 Game 1 — 29–19 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 47–34 kills — Winner: 1w Team
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PGL Group Stage Ended Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Team Cobra 1 Game 1 — 46–16 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 54–50 kills — Winner: Team Cobra; Game 3 — 44–16 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PGL Group Stage Ended GamerLegion, Winner 2 Pipsqueak+4 1 Game 1 — 22–38 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 34–15 kills — Winner: GamerLegion; Game 3 — 42–12 kills — Winner: GamerLegion
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PGL Group Stage Ended Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Yakult Brothers 1 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —; Game 3 — —
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PGL Group Stage Ended Aurora Gaming, Winner 2 Pipsqueak+4 1 Game 1 — 17–37 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 61–59 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming; Game 3 — 53–35 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming
All Pipsqueak+4 Encounters
1w Team
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PARI Group Stage Ended Team Yandex, Winner 2 1w Team 0 Game 1 — 39–20 kills — Winner: Team Yandex; Game 2 — 27–11 kills — Winner: Team Yandex
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PARI Group Stage Ended 1w Team 0 GamerLegion, Winner 2 Game 1 — 10–29 kills — Winner: GamerLegion; Game 2 — 22–32 kills — Winner: GamerLegion
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PARI Group Stage Ended 1w Team 0 OG, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–21 kills — Winner: OG; Game 2 — 25–45 kills — Winner: OG
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PARI Group Stage Ended Team Liquid, Winner 2 1w Team 0 Game 1 — 47–41 kills — Winner: Team Liquid; Game 2 — 36–7 kills — Winner: Team Liquid
Dota 2 T1 bo3 BS Playoffs Ended PARIVISION, Winner 2 1w Team 1 Game 1 — 27–29 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 40–20 kills — Winner: PARIVISION; Game 3 — 47–24 kills — Winner: PARIVISION
All 1w Team Encounters

Other CCT matches

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended AVULUS 0 Passion UA, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–25 kills — Winner: Passion UA; Game 2 — 13–30 kills — Winner: Passion UA
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended 4Pirates 1 Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Game 1 — 24–32 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 38–23 kills — Winner: 4Pirates; Game 3 — 10–27 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended Runa Team, Winner 2 AVULUS 0 Game 1 — 22–11 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 2 — 33–27 kills — Winner: Runa Team
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended Team Public, Winner 2 Passion UA 1 Game 1 — 40–38 kills — Winner: Passion UA; Game 2 — 34–14 kills — Winner: Team Public; Game 3 — 48–12 kills — Winner: Team Public
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended Runa Team, Winner 2 Pipsqueak+4 1 Game 1 — 21–21 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 32–27 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 3 — 38–16 kills — Winner: Runa Team
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended Team Public 1 1w Team, Winner 2 Game 1 — 33–15 kills — Winner: Team Public; Game 2 — 14–22 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 3 — 3–21 kills — Winner: 1w Team
All CCT matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
10 months ago
Tournament
2025 CCT Season 2 Series 6
Stage
Bracket
Format
bo3

Login