Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 3h 41m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Infamous Gaming
2:1
chandogs
  • Game 1 13–39 kills chan
  • Game 2 36–29 kills InF
  • Game 3 31–20 kills InF
1349 +19 ENSI.Score before the match 1416 −19
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 35 minutes 13–39 kills chan won
  2. Game 2 44 minutes 36–29 kills InF won
  3. Game 3 43 minutes 31–20 kills InF won

Player statistics

3 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Infamous Gaming
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
lalatronii <Peru Juan Rosales 3 26 9 33 +17 29,194 106,862 836 737 / 994
JPPeru Yanpier Chavez 3 22 13 25 +9 26,347 72,886 510 667 / 857
Improvee(pls?Canada 3 18 18 34 +0 21,555 91,420 532 597 / 673
slad1n-Ecuador Alexis Cepeda Sitl Sitl 3 5 28 51 -23 10,884 30,918 205 337 / 488
CHAAANNNPeru Jose Carlos Vilcatoma Diaz 3 9 20 48 -11 10,578 36,738 77 302 / 497
chandogs
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
DCMCPeru Michael Cordero Rufino 3 18 17 36 +1 25,186 77,264 610 690 / 887
YISUSColombia Andres Robayo 3 24 14 31 +10 21,662 68,959 534 602 / 847
SLATEM$Peru Jordan Vega 3 25 14 46 +11 21,618 83,933 629 613 / 797
JimmyCoff666Peru Jimmy Huayhuameza Cardenas 3 10 18 56 -8 12,520 35,380 197 350 / 443
DestroyerPeru Yordi Izarra Leon 3 10 17 43 -7 11,068 41,211 123 327 / 443

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Infamous Gaming

chandogs

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Infamous Gaming Now chandogs
  1. Loss against PR, Jan 29
  2. Win against ZETTA, Mar 04
  3. Win against BTC.G, Mar 05
  4. Loss against x5G, Mar 06
  5. Loss against EB, Mar 07
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against Heroic, Apr 12
  2. Loss against EB, Apr 13
  3. Win against AG, Jun 01
  4. Loss against EB, Jun 02
  5. Loss against RHCP, Jun 02
2 losses Streak 2 losses
30% Winrate 10 20%
40% Winrate 30 36%
−10 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −16 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Infamous Gaming chandogs

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Infamous Gaming chandogs
1 Wins1 meeting 0
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Infamous Gaming, Winner 2 chandogs 1 Game 1 — 13–39 kills — Winner: chandogs; Game 2 — 36–29 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming; Game 3 — 31–20 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming

Teams Recent Performance

Infamous Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Infamous Gaming 1 estar backs, Winner 2 Game 1 — 31–17 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming; Game 2 — 5–23 kills — Winner: estar backs; Game 3 — 18–37 kills — Winner: estar backs
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Infamous Gaming 0 x5 Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 17–26 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming; Game 2 — 27–32 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended BTC Gaming 1 Infamous Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 31–47 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming; Game 2 — 29–22 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming; Game 3 — 10–33 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Infamous Gaming, Winner 2 Zetta Games 1 Game 1 — 33–8 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming; Game 2 — 34–40 kills — Winner: Zetta Games; Game 3 — 47–12 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Peru Rejects, Winner 2 Infamous Gaming 0 Game 1 — 40–19 kills — Winner: Peru Rejects; Game 2 — 41–37 kills — Winner: Peru Rejects
All Infamous Gaming Encounters
chandogs
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC South America Ended chandogs 0 Red Hot Chili Pibble, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–27 kills — Winner: Red Hot Chili Pibble; Game 2 — 5–33 kills — Winner: Red Hot Chili Pibble
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC South America Ended estar backs, Winner 2 chandogs 0 Game 1 — 28–12 kills — Winner: estar backs; Game 2 — 31–9 kills — Winner: estar backs
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC South America Ended chandogs, Winner 2 Amaru Gaming 1 Game 1 — 24–21 kills — Winner: Amaru Gaming; Game 2 — 43–33 kills — Winner: chandogs; Game 3 — 28–16 kills — Winner: chandogs
Dota 2 T2 bo3 DL S29 Closed Qualifier Ended Estar_backs, Winner 2 chandogs 0 Game 1 — 37–10 kills — Winner: Estar_backs; Game 2 — 30–12 kills — Winner: Estar_backs
Dota 2 T2 bo3 DL S29 Closed Qualifier Ended Heroic, Winner 2 chandogs 0 Game 1 — 38–13 kills — Winner: Heroic; Game 2 — 27–13 kills — Winner: Heroic
All chandogs Encounters

Other CCT SA matches

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended estar backs, Winner 2 AllStars 1 Game 1 — 38–44 kills — Winner: estar backs; Game 2 — 26–46 kills — Winner: AllStars; Game 3 — 61–31 kills — Winner: estar backs
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended TaiLung Mafia, Winner 2 Flame 1 Game 1 — 12–34 kills — Winner: Flame; Game 2 — 21–14 kills — Winner: TaiLung Mafia; Game 3 — 45–16 kills — Winner: TaiLung Mafia
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Peru Rejects, Winner 2 x5 Gaming 0 Game 1 — 41–13 kills — Winner: Peru Rejects; Game 2 — 34–31 kills — Winner: Peru Rejects
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Flame, Winner 2 chandogs 0 Game 1 — 33–17 kills — Winner: Flame; Game 2 — 34–20 kills — Winner: Flame
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended x5 Gaming 0 AllStars, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–23 kills — Winner: AllStars; Game 2 — 35–38 kills — Winner: AllStars
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Peru Rejects 1 estar backs, Winner 2 Game 1 — 4–28 kills — Winner: estar backs; Game 2 — 26–6 kills — Winner: Peru Rejects; Game 3 — 15–38 kills — Winner: estar backs
All CCT SA matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
11 months ago
Postponed from
GMT+00:00
Tournament
2025 CCT Season 2: South America Series 1
Stage
Bracket
Format
bo3

Login