Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 9m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Zero Tenacity
2:0
Runa Team
  • Game 1 37–24 kills Z10
  • Game 2 29–27 kills Z10
1441 +22 ENSI.Score before the match 1569 −22
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 51 minutes 37–24 kills Z10 won
  2. Game 2 35 minutes 29–27 kills Z10 won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
KamiKyrgyzstan Kyalbek Tayirov 2 25 7 16 +18 28,194 62,573 393 738 / 915
WorickRussia Vitaly Brezgin 2 19 7 27 +12 23,865 64,576 447 623 / 975
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 2 12 10 39 +2 23,187 29,864 351 583 / 816
SeMongolia Tugstur Dashzeveg 2 4 11 48 -7 14,639 23,209 103 379 / 574
dEsireGreece Sakis Kartsampas 2 4 17 39 -13 11,853 20,413 116 345 / 524
Runa Team
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
NesfeerRussia Kurbanov Magomed 2 17 12 17 +5 27,253 53,330 504 699 / 803
Nicky`CoolKazakhstan Nikita Ostakov 2 16 9 17 +7 21,458 54,032 377 571 / 793
alberkaaaRussia Albert Chernoivanov 2 4 12 21 -8 17,749 28,989 386 479 / 627
queezy小个子Russia Alexander Lipin 2 7 15 22 -8 11,768 29,704 177 326 / 424
HduoUkraine Ilya Deriglazov 2 7 19 34 -12 10,442 27,724 49 305 / 442

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Zero Tenacity

Did not play this match

Runa Team

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Zero Tenacity Now Runa Team
  1. Loss against 111, Oct 11
  2. Loss against Lynx, Oct 13
  3. Loss against MW, Oct 14
  4. Win against PuckChamp, Oct 15
  5. Loss against CH, Oct 16
 Formlast 5
  1. Win against NGX, Dec 11
  2. Loss against XG, Dec 12
  3. Win against AG, Dec 13
  4. Win against Liquid, Dec 14
  5. Loss against Tundra, Dec 15
1 loss Streak 1 loss
20% Winrate 10 50%
43% Winrate 30 50%
−23 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp 0 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Zero Tenacity Runa Team

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Zero Tenacity Runa Team
1 Wins6 meetings 5
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CISB Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Runa Team 0 Game 1 — 37–24 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 29–27 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Runa Team, Winner 2 Game 1 — 10–18 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 2 — 4–20 kills — Winner: Runa Team
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S27 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Runa Team, Winner 2 Game 1 — 20–36 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 2 — 21–34 kills — Winner: Runa Team
Dota 2 T3 bo5 CCT Playoffs Ended Runa Team, Winner 3 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 36–30 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 2 — 35–17 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 3 — 24–17 kills — Winner: Runa Team
All Z10 and Runa Encounters (6)

Teams Recent Performance

Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 44–29 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 28–32 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 30–6 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 36–17 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Mena Warriors, Winner 2 Game 1 — 48–34 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 18–47 kills — Winner: Mena Warriors; Game 3 — 16–35 kills — Winner: Mena Warriors
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Team Lynx, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 1 Game 1 — 42–17 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 2 — 18–41 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 49–43 kills — Winner: Team Lynx
Dota 2 T3 bo1 DL S30 Eastern Europe Ended 111, Winner 1 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — —
All Zero Tenacity Encounters
Runa Team
Dota 2 T1 bo3 DL S27 Group Stage Ended Runa Team 0 Tundra Esports, Winner 2 Game 1 — 15–31 kills — Winner: Tundra Esports; Game 2 — 16–34 kills — Winner: Tundra Esports
Dota 2 T1 bo3 DL S27 Group Stage Ended Team Liquid 1 Runa Team, Winner 2 Game 1 — 5–30 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 2 — 29–9 kills — Winner: Team Liquid; Game 3 — 23–41 kills — Winner: Runa Team
Dota 2 T1 bo3 DL S27 Group Stage Ended Runa Team, Winner 2 Amaru Gaming 0 Game 1 — 26–12 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 2 — 42–17 kills — Winner: Runa Team
Dota 2 T1 bo3 DL S27 Group Stage Ended Xtreme Gaming, Winner 2 Runa Team 1 Game 1 — 21–27 kills — Winner: Xtreme Gaming; Game 2 — 14–36 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 3 — 32–25 kills — Winner: Xtreme Gaming
Dota 2 T1 bo3 DL S27 Group Stage Ended Nigma Galaxy 0 Runa Team, Winner 2 Game 1 — 33–36 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 2 — 9–35 kills — Winner: Runa Team
All Runa Team Encounters

Other CISB matches

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CISB Playoffs Ended Yellow Submarine 1 Runa Team, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–23 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 2 — 38–18 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine; Game 3 — 20–47 kills — Winner: Runa Team
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CISB Playoffs Ended Most Wanted, Winner 2 4Pirates 1 Game 1 — 20–41 kills — Winner: 4Pirates; Game 2 — 33–6 kills — Winner: Most Wanted; Game 3 — 46–14 kills — Winner: Most Wanted
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CISB Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Most Wanted, Winner 2 Game 1 — 20–33 kills — Winner: Most Wanted; Game 2 — 35–21 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 18–32 kills — Winner: Most Wanted
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CISB Playoffs Ended Runa Team, Winner 2 4Pirates 1 Game 1 — 46–24 kills — Winner: Runa Team; Game 2 — 13–26 kills — Winner: 4Pirates; Game 3 — 33–8 kills — Winner: Runa Team
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CISB Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Yellow Submarine 0 Game 1 — 25–13 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 39–11 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
All CISB matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
11 months ago
Tournament
2025 CIS Battle 3
Stage
Bracket
Format
bo3

Login