Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 1h 49m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Infamous Gaming
2:0
Flame
1319 +17 ENSI.Score before the match 1340 −17
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Lineups

Infamous Gaming

Flame

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Infamous Gaming Now Flame
  1. Loss against PR, Jan 29
  2. Win against ZETTA, Mar 04
  3. Win against BTC.G, Mar 05
  4. Loss against x5G, Mar 06
  5. Loss against EB, Mar 07
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against PIPS4, Jun 01
  2. Win against Z10, Jun 18
  3. Loss against 4iki, Jun 19
  4. Win against Hive, Jun 20
  5. Loss against Z10, Jun 21
2 losses Streak 1 loss
30% Winrate 10 40%
40% Winrate 30 40%
−10 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp 0 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Infamous Gaming Flame

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Infamous Gaming Flame
1 Wins1 meeting 0
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Infamous Gaming, Winner 2 Flame 0 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —

Teams Recent Performance

Infamous Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Infamous Gaming 1 estar backs, Winner 2 Game 1 — 31–17 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming; Game 2 — 5–23 kills — Winner: estar backs; Game 3 — 18–37 kills — Winner: estar backs
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Infamous Gaming 0 x5 Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 17–26 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming; Game 2 — 27–32 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended BTC Gaming 1 Infamous Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 31–47 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming; Game 2 — 29–22 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming; Game 3 — 10–33 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Infamous Gaming, Winner 2 Zetta Games 1 Game 1 — 33–8 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming; Game 2 — 34–40 kills — Winner: Zetta Games; Game 3 — 47–12 kills — Winner: Infamous Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Peru Rejects, Winner 2 Infamous Gaming 0 Game 1 — 40–19 kills — Winner: Peru Rejects; Game 2 — 41–37 kills — Winner: Peru Rejects
All Infamous Gaming Encounters
Flame
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S38 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Flame 0 Game 1 — 27–29 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 47–20 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S38 Playoffs Ended Flame, Winner 2 Hive 1 Game 1 — 44–24 kills — Winner: Flame; Game 2 — 5–36 kills — Winner: Hive; Game 3 — 40–37 kills — Winner: Flame
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S38 Playoffs Ended Flame 0 4ikibamboni, Winner 2 Game 1 — 30–38 kills — Winner: 4ikibamboni; Game 2 — 27–47 kills — Winner: 4ikibamboni
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S38 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Flame, Winner 2 Game 1 — 27–33 kills — Winner: Flame; Game 2 — 38–40 kills — Winner: Flame
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Western Europe Ended Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Flame 0 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —
All Flame Encounters

Other CCT SA matches

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Avalanche eSports 0 x5 Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 12–30 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming; Game 2 — 15–26 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended BTC Gaming 0 Amaru Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 15–32 kills — Winner: Amaru Gaming; Game 2 — 16–42 kills — Winner: Amaru Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Under Effect, Winner 2 Avalanche eSports 0 Game 1 — 33–22 kills — Winner: Under Effect; Game 2 — 27–19 kills — Winner: Under Effect
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Peru Rejects, Winner 2 Infamous Gaming 0 Game 1 — 40–19 kills — Winner: Peru Rejects; Game 2 — 41–37 kills — Winner: Peru Rejects
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended BTC Gaming, Winner 2 Under Effect 0 Game 1 — 31–23 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming; Game 2 — 49–12 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Ended Amaru Gaming, Winner 2 x5 Gaming 0 Game 1 — 30–7 kills — Winner: Amaru Gaming; Game 2 — 31–17 kills — Winner: Amaru Gaming
All CCT SA matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
8 months ago
Tournament
2026 CCT Season 2: South America Series 2
Stage
Bracket
Format
bo3

Login