Agressiv Style vs Biz gaming 2:1 Dota 2, Jan 21 - Map Stats - Ensigame

Skip to content

T3
Dota 2
bo3
Ended Jan 21, 22:31
Duration 3h 31m
Times in GMT+00:00

Agressiv Style

2:1

Game 1 25–23 kills BIZ
Game 2 36–8 kills AGRESS
Game 3 33–16 kills AGRESS

1400 +16 ENSI.Score before the match 1400 −16

— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

Game 1 48 minutes 25–23 kills BIZ won
Game 2 30 minutes 36–8 kills AGRESS won
Game 3 40 minutes 33–16 kills AGRESS won

Player statistics

3 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Agressiv Style
Player	M	K	D	A	+/-	NW	HD	CS	GPM/XPM	More numbers
FerrazL	3	39	8	23	+31	28,810	78,322	732	777 / 874
Soul光 Josue Ronald Ticona Aliendre	3	20	6	43	+14	22,186	67,730	713	610 / 809
shylo	3	18	4	54	+14	19,607	52,646	511	539 / 699
Fnk	3	7	14	71	-7	10,243	36,741	113	295 / 569
Rei Florestas	3	10	15	55	-5	9,017	26,112	35	279 / 502

Biz gaming
Player	M	K	D	A	+/-	NW	HD	CS	GPM/XPM	More numbers
shy	3	16	12	13	+4	23,506	70,537	566	628 / 814
Fantassy19-	3	9	21	20	-12	21,570	38,203	433	564 / 708
Ryoma	3	12	20	20	-8	20,301	62,484	626	564 / 696
ArkaNa	3	3	14	24	-11	11,981	26,864	290	351 / 501
arrakiz	3	5	27	23	-22	8,832	27,114	115	266 / 365

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Structures

AGRESS 5/17 BIZ 14/17

Picks and Bans

Agressiv Style

Biz gaming

Player Stats and Builds

Agressiv Style Dire
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
24 FerrazL	9	5	7	+4	1.8	27,712	23,412	286 / 2 / 199	630 / 679
26 Soul光 Josue Ronald Ticona Aliendre	8	3	9	+5	2.67	25,725	23,813	278 / 6 / 227	619 / 839
20 Fnk	3	7	17	-4	0.43	9,106	11,123	56 / 2 / 6	260 / 457
18 Rei Florestas	3	6	16	-3	0.5	6,843	10,816	8 / 2 / 5	210 / 405
22 shylo	2	2	19	+0	1	19,640	15,642	209 / 8 / 82	443 / 590

Biz gaming Radiant
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
28 shy	11	2	4	+9	5.5	33,845	39,367	233 / 14 / 246	742 / 1,125
26 Ryoma	6	5	12	+1	1.2	29,443	25,018	294 / 1 / 129	659 / 836
26 Fantassy19-	4	7	12	-3	0.57	28,697	17,957	143 / 5 / 292	607 / 808
20 arrakiz	2	7	15	-5	0.29	15,652	6,600	63 / 2 / 2	343 / 479
22 ArkaNa	0	4	10	-4	0	15,195	9,091	104 / 4 / 38	352 / 585

K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · K/D — Kills/Deaths Ratio · Damage — Hero Damage · Creep Stats — Creep Kills / Denies / Neutral · GPM / XPM — Gold Per Minute / Experience Per Minute

Structures

AGRESS 13/17 BIZ 5/17

Picks and Bans

Agressiv Style

Biz gaming

Player Stats and Builds

Agressiv Style Dire
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
19 shylo	15	1	12	+14	15	18,048	24,831	123 / 17 / 52	608 / 693
22 FerrazL	8	1	11	+7	8	23,616	19,162	183 / 9 / 162	788 / 925
21 Soul光 Josue Ronald Ticona Aliendre	6	1	21	+5	6	17,192	23,981	202 / 17 / 19	607 / 810
17 Rei Florestas	5	3	22	+2	1.67	10,125	8,992	12 / 1 / 1	320 / 550
18 Fnk	2	2	25	+0	1	8,637	11,043	13 / 2 / 0	288 / 589

Biz gaming Radiant
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
11 arrakiz	3	10	3	-7	0.3	4,589	9,052	13 / 3 / 2	225 / 253
17 Ryoma	2	8	3	-6	0.25	13,200	13,992	112 / 2 / 132	488 / 545
18 shy	1	5	3	-4	0.2	16,041	18,720	162 / 17 / 181	564 / 618
14 ArkaNa	0	6	6	-6	0	6,780	7,370	43 / 1 / 34	296 / 384
17 Fantassy19-	0	7	2	-7	0	13,377	7,473	140 / 7 / 115	478 / 558

K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · K/D — Kills/Deaths Ratio · Damage — Hero Damage · Creep Stats — Creep Kills / Denies / Neutral · GPM / XPM — Gold Per Minute / Experience Per Minute

Structures

AGRESS 10/17 BIZ 6/17

Picks and Bans

Agressiv Style

Biz gaming

Player Stats and Builds

Agressiv Style Dire
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
26 FerrazL	22	2	5	+20	11	35,103	35,748	263 / 3 / 183	912 / 1,017
23 Soul光 Josue Ronald Ticona Aliendre	6	2	13	+4	3	23,642	19,936	233 / 11 / 89	605 / 778
22 Fnk	2	5	29	-3	0.4	12,987	14,575	44 / 1 / 1	337 / 662
20 Rei Florestas	2	6	17	-4	0.33	10,084	6,304	15 / 0 / 1	307 / 552
24 shylo	1	1	23	+0	1	21,133	12,173	179 / 6 / 117	566 / 814

Biz gaming Radiant
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
23 Fantassy19-	5	7	6	-2	0.71	22,637	12,773	150 / 6 / 268	607 / 758
22 Ryoma	4	7	5	-3	0.57	18,259	23,474	220 / 2 / 135	544 / 706
22 shy	4	5	6	-1	0.8	20,631	12,450	171 / 11 / 246	579 / 699
20 ArkaNa	3	4	8	-1	0.75	13,968	10,403	143 / 2 / 64	405 / 534
16 arrakiz	0	10	5	-10	0	6,254	11,462	39 / 3 / 6	230 / 363

K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · K/D — Kills/Deaths Ratio · Damage — Hero Damage · Creep Stats — Creep Kills / Denies / Neutral · GPM / XPM — Gold Per Minute / Experience Per Minute

Lineups

Agressiv Style

Biz gaming

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Agressiv Style Now

Win against BIZ, Jan 21
Loss against BTC.G, Jan 22
Loss against UNDER, Jan 25

Formlast 5

Loss against AGRESS, Jan 21
Loss against UNDER, Jan 22
Loss against ZETTA, Apr 13
Loss against Earth, Apr 14

2 losses Streak 4 losses

33% Winrate 10 0%

33% Winrate 30 0%

0 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp 0 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

1 Wins1 meeting 0

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 21 Ended Agressiv Style, Winner 2

Biz gaming 1 Game 1 — 25–23 kills — Winner: Biz gaming; Game 2 — 36–8 kills — Winner: Agressiv Style; Game 3 — 33–16 kills — Winner: Agressiv Style

Teams Recent Performance

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 25 Ended Agressiv Style 1

Under Effect, Winner 2 Game 1 — 36–16 kills — Winner: Agressiv Style; Game 2 — 38–44 kills — Winner: Under Effect; Game 3 — 29–34 kills — Winner: Under Effect

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 22 Ended

BTC Gaming, Winner 2 Agressiv Style 0 Game 1 — 37–37 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming; Game 2 — 29–3 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 21 Ended Agressiv Style, Winner 2

Biz gaming 1 Game 1 — 25–23 kills — Winner: Biz gaming; Game 2 — 36–8 kills — Winner: Agressiv Style; Game 3 — 33–16 kills — Winner: Agressiv Style

All Agressiv Style Encounters

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Apr 14 Ended

Earth Gaming, Winner 2

Biz gaming 1 Game 1 — 18–33 kills — Winner: Biz gaming; Game 2 — 36–32 kills — Winner: Earth Gaming; Game 3 — 32–46 kills — Winner: Earth Gaming

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Playoffs Apr 14 Ended

Zetta Games, Winner 2

Biz gaming 1 Game 1 — 32–16 kills — Winner: Zetta Games; Game 2 — 22–30 kills — Winner: Biz gaming; Game 3 — 13–5 kills — Winner: Zetta Games

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 23 Ended

Under Effect, Winner 2

Biz gaming 1 Game 1 — 16–37 kills — Winner: Biz gaming; Game 2 — 37–6 kills — Winner: Under Effect; Game 3 — 39–36 kills — Winner: Under Effect

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 21 Ended Agressiv Style, Winner 2

Biz gaming 1 Game 1 — 25–23 kills — Winner: Biz gaming; Game 2 — 36–8 kills — Winner: Agressiv Style; Game 3 — 33–16 kills — Winner: Agressiv Style

All Biz gaming Encounters

Other CCT SA matches

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 21 Ended Puraka Esports 0

Flame, Winner 2 Game 1 — 9–30 kills — Winner: Flame; Game 2 — 29–39 kills — Winner: Flame

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 21 Ended

BTC Gaming, Winner 2

Under Effect 1 Game 1 — 7–32 kills — Winner: Under Effect; Game 2 — 35–11 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming; Game 3 — 31–6 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 22 Ended

x5 Gaming, Winner 2

chandogs 1 Game 1 — 19–32 kills — Winner: chandogs; Game 2 — 33–8 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming; Game 3 — 34–18 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 22 Ended

BTC Gaming, Winner 2 Agressiv Style 0 Game 1 — 37–37 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming; Game 2 — 29–3 kills — Winner: BTC Gaming

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 22 Ended

x5 Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 32–16 kills — Winner: Flame; Game 2 — 41–50 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming; Game 3 — 39–42 kills — Winner: x5 Gaming

Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT SA Group Stage Jan 23 Ended

Under Effect, Winner 2

Biz gaming 1 Game 1 — 16–37 kills — Winner: Biz gaming; Game 2 — 37–6 kills — Winner: Under Effect; Game 3 — 39–36 kills — Winner: Under Effect

All CCT SA matches

Advertisement

About the match

Played on: Jan 21 19:00 GMT+00:00; 8 months ago
Tournament: 2026 CCT Season 2: South America Series 2
Stage: Group B
Format: bo3