Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 21m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Zero Tenacity
0:2
1w Team
  • Game 1 19–21 kills 1win
  • Game 2 29–31 kills 1win
1494 −11 ENSI.Score before the match 1602 +11
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Last meeting · Apr 06, 2026 · Zero Tenacity 2:1

Maps

  1. Game 1 41 minutes 19–21 kills 1win won
  2. Game 2 56 minutes 29–31 kills 1win won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
KamiKyrgyzstan Kyalbek Tayirov 2 13 9 16 +4 29,066 87,355 677 680 / 756
WorickRussia Vitaly Brezgin 2 13 6 22 +7 24,077 65,946 507 546 / 588
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 2 12 5 19 +7 19,342 28,506 353 441 / 533
MoOzPeru Joel Mori Ozambela 2 5 14 22 -9 15,332 40,369 242 385 / 492
dEsireGreece Sakis Kartsampas 2 5 18 26 -13 10,398 37,294 96 259 / 417
1w Team
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
ssnovv1Russia Ilya Kondrashov 2 21 4 16 +17 35,707 74,673 688 825 / 973
squad1xRussia Ilya Kuvaldin 2 18 7 25 +11 27,970 68,728 548 632 / 806
мистер моральRussia Ivan Ilichev 2 5 9 31 -4 19,626 30,458 366 460 / 598
REINRussia Kosygin Vladislav Alexandrovich 2 4 14 31 -10 14,950 33,808 155 384 / 527
swedenstrongRussia Georgiy Zainalabidov 2 4 14 35 -10 13,110 33,333 73 312 / 493

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Zero Tenacity

1w Team

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Zero Tenacity Now 1w Team
  1. Loss against YeS, Oct 19
  2. Win against Bulls, Oct 21
  3. Win against TB, Oct 22
  4. Loss against Synapse, Oct 24
  5. Loss against CH, Oct 25
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against PARIVISION, Oct 09
  2. Loss against Liquid, Oct 22
  3. Loss against OG, Oct 23
  4. Loss against GL, Oct 24
  5. Loss against Yandex, Oct 25
2 losses Streak 6 losses
40% Winrate 10 30%
40% Winrate 30 43%
0 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −13 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Zero Tenacity 1w Team
1 Advantage2 common opponents 2

Previous Encounters

Zero Tenacity 1w Team
1 Wins3 meetings 2
Dota 2 T2 bo3 PS Group Stage Ended 1w Team 1 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 25–17 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 26–9 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 3 — 22–20 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity 0 1w Team, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–21 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 29–31 kills — Winner: 1w Team
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLD2 S1 Group Stage Ended 1w Team, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 24–13 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 23–6 kills — Winner: 1w Team
All Z10 and 1win Encounters (3)

Teams Recent Performance

Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 34–15 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 43–35 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Team Synapse, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 1 Game 1 — 49–30 kills — Winner: Team Synapse; Game 2 — 35–36 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 51–28 kills — Winner: Team Synapse
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended TheBot$ 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–38 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 22–42 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Dawn Bulls 1 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 33–12 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls; Game 2 — 12–31 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 6–29 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Yellow Submarine, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 24–4 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine; Game 2 — 31–32 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine
All Zero Tenacity Encounters
1w Team
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PARI Group Stage Ended Team Yandex, Winner 2 1w Team 0 Game 1 — 39–20 kills — Winner: Team Yandex; Game 2 — 27–11 kills — Winner: Team Yandex
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PARI Group Stage Ended 1w Team 0 GamerLegion, Winner 2 Game 1 — 10–29 kills — Winner: GamerLegion; Game 2 — 22–32 kills — Winner: GamerLegion
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PARI Group Stage Ended 1w Team 0 OG, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–21 kills — Winner: OG; Game 2 — 25–45 kills — Winner: OG
Dota 2 T1 bo3 PARI Group Stage Ended Team Liquid, Winner 2 1w Team 0 Game 1 — 47–41 kills — Winner: Team Liquid; Game 2 — 36–7 kills — Winner: Team Liquid
Dota 2 T1 bo3 BS Playoffs Ended PARIVISION, Winner 2 1w Team 1 Game 1 — 27–29 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 40–20 kills — Winner: PARIVISION; Game 3 — 47–24 kills — Winner: PARIVISION
All 1w Team Encounters

Other DLDL S3 matches

Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Team Silk 0 Virtus.pro, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–30 kills — Winner: Virtus.pro; Game 2 — 12–42 kills — Winner: Virtus.pro
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Inner Circle, Winner 2 Nigma Galaxy 1 Game 1 — 30–20 kills — Winner: Inner Circle; Game 2 — 5–35 kills — Winner: Nigma Galaxy; Game 3 — 29–12 kills — Winner: Inner Circle
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended AVULUS 0 Aurora Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 4–27 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming; Game 2 — 27–42 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Virtus.pro 1 Game 1 — 20–40 kills — Winner: Virtus.pro; Game 2 — 32–13 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 23–9 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Aurora Gaming, Winner 2 1w Team 1 Game 1 — 10–27 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 31–34 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming; Game 3 — 23–5 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Nigma Galaxy, Winner 2 Team Silk 0 Game 1 — 36–13 kills — Winner: Nigma Galaxy; Game 2 — 37–11 kills — Winner: Nigma Galaxy
All DLDL S3 matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
8 months ago
Tournament
2026 DreamLeague Division 2 Season 3
Stage
Round Robin
Format
bo3

Login