Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 1h 59m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
AVULUS
0:2
Zero Tenacity
  • Game 1 16–33 kills Z10
  • Game 2 19–33 kills Z10
1447 −14 ENSI.Score before the match 1502 +14
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Last meeting · Feb 11, 2026 · Zero Tenacity 2:0

Maps

  1. Game 1 36 minutes 16–33 kills Z10 won
  2. Game 2 41 minutes 19–33 kills Z10 won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

AVULUS
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
TA2000Kazakhstan Aybek Tokaev 2 9 9 13 +0 21,781 39,188 411 610 / 706
DualrazeeUkraine Mykyta Dubynskyi 2 13 10 12 +3 20,581 60,041 381 568 / 791
VazyaRussia Ivan Herman 2 6 12 18 -6 18,352 23,694 358 525 / 581
asdekor_rRussia Vyacheslav Ignatev 2 4 16 16 -12 8,051 18,394 81 257 / 351
semataryRussia Maksim Kravchenkov 2 3 20 19 -17 6,956 24,220 58 237 / 354
Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
KamiKyrgyzstan Kyalbek Tayirov 2 15 6 24 +9 26,516 60,090 406 745 / 852
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 2 16 2 27 +14 20,897 38,436 310 549 / 646
WorickRussia Vitaly Brezgin 2 16 6 38 +10 20,495 46,491 306 543 / 743
MoOzPeru Joel Mori Ozambela 2 8 11 37 -3 13,279 37,943 131 398 / 541
dEsireGreece Sakis Kartsampas 2 11 10 37 +1 12,468 26,328 93 377 / 557

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

AVULUS

Did not play this match

Zero Tenacity

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

AVULUS Now Zero Tenacity
  1. Loss against L1ga, Mar 13
  2. Win against NAVI.JR, Mar 14
  3. Loss against paiN, Mar 16
  4. Win against PIPS4, Mar 17
  5. Loss against PR, Mar 18
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against PIPS4, Sep 04
  2. Win against DYN, Sep 06
  3. Loss against Na'Vi, Sep 12
  4. Loss against 2M, Sep 21
  5. Loss against Lynx, Sep 22
1 loss Streak 3 losses
50% Winrate 10 40%
43% Winrate 30 53%
+7 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −13 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

AVULUS Zero Tenacity

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

AVULUS Zero Tenacity
1 Wins4 meetings 3
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 AVULUS 0 Game 1 — 32–14 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 32–16 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended AVULUS 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 16–33 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 19–33 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 PGL WS Western Europe Ended AVULUS 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 17–43 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 15–30 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 DL S26 Closed Qualifier Ended Zero Tenacity 0 AVULUS, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–32 kills — Winner: AVULUS; Game 2 — 11–24 kills — Winner: AVULUS
All AVULUS and Z10 Encounters (4)

Teams Recent Performance

AVULUS
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended Power Rangers, Winner 2 AVULUS 0 Game 1 — 37–18 kills — Winner: Power Rangers; Game 2 — 32–12 kills — Winner: Power Rangers
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended Pipsqueak+4 0 AVULUS, Winner 2 Game 1 — 15–29 kills — Winner: AVULUS; Game 2 — 23–44 kills — Winner: AVULUS
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Playoffs Ended paiN Gaming, Winner 2 AVULUS 0 Game 1 — 36–8 kills — Winner: paiN Gaming; Game 2 — 25–5 kills — Winner: paiN Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Group Stage Ended AVULUS, Winner 2 Navi Junior 1 Game 1 — 32–8 kills — Winner: AVULUS; Game 2 — 11–23 kills — Winner: Navi Junior; Game 3 — 30–17 kills — Winner: AVULUS
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Group Stage Ended L1ga Team, Winner 2 AVULUS 0 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —
All AVULUS Encounters
Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Team Lynx, Winner 2 Game 1 — 44–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 27–43 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 3 — 23–37 kills — Winner: Team Lynx
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Two Move, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 41–20 kills — Winner: Two Move; Game 2 — 42–39 kills — Winner: Two Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 BS Closed Qualifier Ended Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 37–22 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 39–10 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–27 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 12–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–46 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 24–34 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
All Zero Tenacity Encounters

Other DLDL S3 matches

Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Aurora Gaming, Winner 2 1w Team 1 Game 1 — 10–27 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 31–34 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming; Game 3 — 23–5 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Nigma Galaxy, Winner 2 Team Silk 0 Game 1 — 36–13 kills — Winner: Nigma Galaxy; Game 2 — 37–11 kills — Winner: Nigma Galaxy
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended 1w Team, Winner 2 Team Silk 0 Game 1 — 28–9 kills — Winner: 1w Team; Game 2 — 33–30 kills — Winner: 1w Team
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Inner Circle 0 Virtus.pro, Winner 2 Game 1 — 8–28 kills — Winner: Virtus.pro; Game 2 — 20–17 kills — Winner: Virtus.pro
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended Nigma Galaxy 1 Aurora Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 17–35 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming; Game 2 — 35–28 kills — Winner: Nigma Galaxy; Game 3 — 14–35 kills — Winner: Aurora Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S3 Group Stage Ended AVULUS, Winner 2 Inner Circle 0 Game 1 — 33–13 kills — Winner: AVULUS; Game 2 — 39–23 kills — Winner: AVULUS
All DLDL S3 matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
7 months ago
Tournament
2026 DreamLeague Division 2 Season 3
Stage
Round Robin
Format
bo3

Login