Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 1h 59m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Ilbirs eSports
0:2
Zero Tenacity
  • Game 1 19–32 kills Z10
  • Game 2 12–30 kills Z10
1415 −13 ENSI.Score before the match 1486 +13
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 49 minutes 19–32 kills Z10 won
  2. Game 2 28 minutes 12–30 kills Z10 won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Ilbirs eSports
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
423Mongolia Altanginj Bilguun 2 12 9 7 +3 22,141 43,857 480 636 / 677
nicheUkraine Mykola Zemlianskyi 2 8 9 16 -1 18,082 40,948 351 514 / 589
NormaUkraine Taras Pavlov 2 3 15 14 -12 15,275 21,905 345 450 / 543
ponloSingapore Remus Goh Zhi Xian 2 4 20 16 -16 8,325 16,128 73 258 / 379
FernansUkraine Vladyslav Kochetkov 2 4 10 18 -6 7,673 27,158 35 255 / 378
Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
NesfeerRussia Kurbanov Magomed 2 25 2 18 +23 29,260 64,345 493 795 / 749
MIkSa'Serbia Mykhailo Jovanovich 2 8 5 34 +3 21,010 40,880 410 610 / 777
DifferenceRussia Vladimir Klimontov 2 12 5 23 +7 20,699 62,335 281 554 / 709
mrlsRussia Artem Selepko 2 10 4 33 +6 13,548 28,738 58 354 / 501
dEsireGreece Sakis Kartsampas 2 7 15 39 -8 11,716 22,349 70 342 / 466

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Ilbirs eSports

Zero Tenacity

Did not play this match

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Ilbirs eSports Now Zero Tenacity
  1. Loss against NH, Aug 08
  2. Win against Jenz, Aug 08
  3. Loss against RE, Aug 09
  4. Loss against RE.A, Aug 09
  5. Loss against Z10, Aug 10
 Formlast 5
  1. Win against DYN, Sep 06
  2. Loss against Na'Vi, Sep 12
  3. Loss against 2M, Sep 21
  4. Loss against Lynx, Sep 22
  5. Loss against The Warriors, Oct 09
3 losses Streak 4 losses
50% Winrate 10 30%
50% Winrate 30 53%
0 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −23 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Ilbirs eSports Zero Tenacity

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Ilbirs eSports Zero Tenacity
1 Wins2 meetings 1
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Playoffs Ended Ilbirs eSports 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–32 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 12–30 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Play-in Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Ilbirs eSports, Winner 2 Game 1 — 38–29 kills — Winner: Ilbirs eSports; Game 2 — 33–33 kills — Winner: Ilbirs eSports

Teams Recent Performance

Ilbirs eSports
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Playoffs Ended Ilbirs eSports 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–32 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 12–30 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 ACS1 Playoffs Ended RE Arise, Winner 2 Ilbirs eSports 1 Game 1 — 31–20 kills — Winner: RE Arise; Game 2 — 17–32 kills — Winner: Ilbirs eSports; Game 3 — 38–32 kills — Winner: RE Arise
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Playoffs Ended Ilbirs eSports 0 Rune Eaters, Winner 2 Game 1 — 22–43 kills — Winner: Rune Eaters; Game 2 — 11–35 kills — Winner: Rune Eaters
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Team Jenz 0 Ilbirs eSports, Winner 2 Game 1 — 24–51 kills — Winner: Ilbirs eSports; Game 2 — 62–53 kills — Winner: Ilbirs eSports
Dota 2 T3 bo3 ACS1 Playoffs Ended Ilbirs eSports 1 No Hoodwink, Winner 2 Game 1 — 35–15 kills — Winner: Ilbirs eSports; Game 2 — 9–25 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink; Game 3 — 8–18 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink
All Ilbirs eSports Encounters
Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DL S30 Eastern Europe Ended Zero Tenacity 1 The Warriors, Winner 2 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —; Game 3 — —
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Team Lynx, Winner 2 Game 1 — 44–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 27–43 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 3 — 23–37 kills — Winner: Team Lynx
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Two Move, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 41–20 kills — Winner: Two Move; Game 2 — 42–39 kills — Winner: Two Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 BS Closed Qualifier Ended Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 37–22 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 39–10 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–27 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 12–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
All Zero Tenacity Encounters

Other EPL M matches

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Playoffs Ended Ilbirs eSports 0 Rune Eaters, Winner 2 Game 1 — 22–43 kills — Winner: Rune Eaters; Game 2 — 11–35 kills — Winner: Rune Eaters
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Game 1 — 8–32 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 15–47 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Playoffs Ended Power Rangers 1 MOUZ, Winner 2 Game 1 — 34–5 kills — Winner: Power Rangers; Game 2 — 22–51 kills — Winner: MOUZ; Game 3 — 20–34 kills — Winner: MOUZ
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Playoffs Ended Yellow Submarine 1 Level UP, Winner 2 Game 1 — 31–4 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine; Game 2 — 16–30 kills — Winner: Level UP; Game 3 — 7–29 kills — Winner: Level UP
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Playoffs Ended Rune Eaters 0 Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–38 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 21–67 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Playoffs Ended Level UP 0 Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–22 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 26–38 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
All EPL M matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
2 months ago
Tournament
2026 EPL Masters I
Stage
Bracket
Format
bo3

Login