Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 1h 59m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Level UP
2:0
PuckChamp
  • Game 1 30–5 kills LVLUP
  • Game 2 40–31 kills LVLUP
1400 +21 ENSI.Score before the match 1505 −21
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 23 minutes 30–5 kills LVLUP won
  2. Game 2 51 minutes 40–31 kills LVLUP won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Level UP
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
WoERussia Ruban Nikolay Olegovich 2 16 8 24 +8 25,515 52,586 464 817 / 921
bb3pxRussia Evdokimychev Nikolay 2 13 4 38 +9 24,707 69,216 476 702 / 913
AinkradBelarus Aleksei Diveevskiy 2 13 6 31 +7 20,249 34,147 379 636 / 805
HtrdRussia Andrey Fedorov 2 13 10 31 +3 13,321 18,932 89 436 / 592
queezy小个子Russia Alexander Lipin 2 14 9 38 +5 12,548 34,088 88 379 / 598
PuckChamp
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
YuragiUkraine Artem Golubiev 2 16 9 13 +7 23,848 80,677 519 664 / 820
кроляUkraine Olexander Oliinyk 2 8 9 18 -1 17,265 39,171 344 509 / 610
dreamcoreUkraine Artem Diachuk 2 3 12 21 -9 15,215 53,005 212 422 / 575
hard work pillUkraine Tymur Tarasiuk 2 6 22 21 -16 9,620 60,655 106 300 / 427
HyugaUkraine Denys Deineko 2 2 19 23 -17 7,870 33,462 79 262 / 389

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Level UP

PuckChamp

Did not play this match

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Level UP Now PuckChamp
  1. Win against ICI, Sep 04
  2. Loss against 4iki, Sep 06
  3. Loss against Lynx, Sep 06
  4. Loss against PARIVISION, Sep 29
  5. Loss against XG, Sep 30
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against DYN, Sep 02
  2. Loss against Spirit Acad., Sep 03
  3. Loss against PIPS4, Sep 05
  4. Win against old blood, Oct 10
  5. Loss against CH, Oct 12
4 losses Streak 1 loss
50% Winrate 10 10%
77% Winrate 30 37%
−27 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −27 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Level UP PuckChamp
4 Advantage4 common opponents 1

Previous Encounters

Level UP PuckChamp
2 Wins3 meetings 1
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Level UP, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 30–5 kills — Winner: Level UP; Game 2 — 40–31 kills — Winner: Level UP
Dota 2 T2 bo3 PC Group Stage Ended Level UP, Winner 2 PuckChamp 1 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —; Game 3 — —
Dota 2 T2 bo3 SSS Group Stage Ended PuckChamp, Winner 2 Level UP 0 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —
All LVLUP and PuckChamp Encounters (3)

Teams Recent Performance

Level UP
Dota 2 T1 bo3 BS Group Stage Ended Level UP 0 Xtreme Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 24–29 kills — Winner: Xtreme Gaming; Game 2 — 41–42 kills — Winner: Xtreme Gaming
Dota 2 T1 bo3 BS Group Stage Ended PARIVISION, Winner 2 Level UP 0 Game 1 — 30–20 kills — Winner: PARIVISION; Game 2 — 20–3 kills — Winner: PARIVISION
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Level UP 1 Team Lynx, Winner 2 Game 1 — 37–13 kills — Winner: Level UP; Game 2 — 36–39 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 3 — 15–33 kills — Winner: Team Lynx
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Level UP 0 4ikibamboni, Winner 2 Game 1 — 27–28 kills — Winner: 4ikibamboni; Game 2 — 21–33 kills — Winner: 4ikibamboni
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended IC x Insanity 0 Level UP, Winner 2 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —
All Level UP Encounters
PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 34–19 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 37–26 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DL S30 Western Europe Ended PuckChamp, Winner 2 old blood 1 Game 1 — 27–17 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 2 — 28–28 kills — Winner: old blood; Game 3 — 47–34 kills — Winner: PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 22–16 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 26–9 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Team Spirit Academy, Winner 2 Game 1 — 12–34 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy; Game 2 — 34–47 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 31–15 kills — Winner: DYNASTY; Game 2 — 34–11 kills — Winner: DYNASTY
All PuckChamp Encounters

Other EPL M matches

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Ilbirs eSports, Winner 2 Nemiga Gaming 1 Game 1 — 37–20 kills — Winner: Ilbirs eSports; Game 2 — 26–27 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 3 — 33–20 kills — Winner: Ilbirs eSports
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended RE Arise, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 39–16 kills — Winner: RE Arise; Game 2 — 26–12 kills — Winner: RE Arise
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended RE Arise, Winner 2 KW 0 Game 1 — 46–36 kills — Winner: RE Arise; Game 2 — 42–51 kills — Winner: RE Arise
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Team Jenz 1 Team Syntax, Winner 2 Game 1 — 6–35 kills — Winner: Team Syntax; Game 2 — 39–22 kills — Winner: Team Jenz; Game 3 — 35–37 kills — Winner: Team Syntax
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Team Syntax, Winner 2 Nemiga Gaming 1 Game 1 — 32–41 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 2 — 36–20 kills — Winner: Team Syntax; Game 3 — 39–35 kills — Winner: Team Syntax
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Power Rangers, Winner 2 Nemiga Gaming 1 Game 1 — 26–16 kills — Winner: Power Rangers; Game 2 — 19–35 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 3 — 28–7 kills — Winner: Power Rangers
All EPL M matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
2 months ago
Tournament
2026 EPL Masters I
Stage
Group B
Format
bo3

Login