Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 3h 52s
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Creepwave
2:1
PuckChamp
1540 +17 ENSI.Score before the match 1564 −17
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Last meeting · Sep 24, 2021 · Creepwave 2:0

Lineups

Creepwave

PuckChamp

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Creepwave Now PuckChamp
  1. Win against Brame, Nov 18
  2. Win against Nemiga, Nov 19
  3. Win against NM, Nov 23
  4. Win against HYDRA, Nov 24
  5. Loss against HR, Nov 25
 Formlast 5
  1. Win against YKB, Nov 08
  2. Win against AG, Nov 09
  3. Win against Z10, Nov 09
  4. Loss against CH, Nov 10
  5. Loss against HULIGANI, Nov 11
1 loss Streak 2 losses
80% Winrate 10 50%
70% Winrate 30 30%
+10 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp +20 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Creepwave PuckChamp

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Creepwave PuckChamp
2 Wins4 meetings 2
Dota 2 T2 bo3 D2CL Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Creepwave, Winner 2 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —
Dota 2 T2 bo3 SSS Group Stage Ended Creepwave, Winner 2 PuckChamp 1 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —; Game 3 — —
Dota 2 T3 bo3 SSS Playoffs Ended PuckChamp, Winner 2 Creepwave 1 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —; Game 3 — —
Dota 2 T3 bo3 SSS Playoffs Ended Creepwave 1 PuckChamp, Winner 2 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —; Game 3 — —
All Cwave and PuckChamp Encounters (4)

Teams Recent Performance

Creepwave
Dota 2 T2 bo5 D2CL Playoffs Ended Creepwave 2 Hellraisers, Winner 3 Game 1 — 13–20 kills — Winner: Hellraisers; Game 2 — 27–24 kills — Winner: Creepwave; Game 3 — 16–27 kills — Winner: Hellraisers; Game 4 — 46–25 kills — Winner: Creepwave; Game 5 — 10–26 kills — Winner: Hellraisers
Dota 2 T2 bo3 D2CL Playoffs Ended Creepwave, Winner 2 HYDRA 0 Game 1 — 43–17 kills — Winner: Creepwave; Game 2 — 28–19 kills — Winner: Creepwave
Dota 2 T2 bo3 D2CL Playoffs Ended Creepwave, Winner 2 NoMarci 1 Game 1 — 9–35 kills — Winner: NoMarci; Game 2 — 28–23 kills — Winner: Creepwave; Game 3 — 31–11 kills — Winner: Creepwave
Dota 2 T2 bo3 D2CL Group Stage Ended Nemiga Gaming 1 Creepwave, Winner 2 Game 1 — 25–38 kills — Winner: Creepwave; Game 2 — 11–39 kills — Winner: Creepwave; Game 3 — 30–33 kills — Winner: Creepwave
Dota 2 T2 bo3 D2CL Group Stage Ended Creepwave, Winner 2 Brame 0 Game 1 — 40–16 kills — Winner: Creepwave; Game 2 — 37–21 kills — Winner: Creepwave
All Creepwave Encounters
PuckChamp
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S5 Group Stage Ended HULIGANI, Winner 2 PuckChamp 1 Game 1 — 32–28 kills — Winner: HULIGANI; Game 2 — 23–32 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 3 — 30–25 kills — Winner: HULIGANI
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S5 Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 27–3 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 42–19 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S5 Group Stage Ended PuckChamp, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 36–19 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 2 — 40–21 kills — Winner: PuckChamp
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S5 Group Stage Ended Amaru Gaming 0 PuckChamp, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–30 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 2 — 17–39 kills — Winner: PuckChamp
Dota 2 T3 bo3 DLDL S5 Group Stage Ended Yakult Brothers 0 PuckChamp, Winner 2 Game 1 — 8–24 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 2 — 13–37 kills — Winner: PuckChamp
All PuckChamp Encounters
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
5 years ago
Tournament
Snow Sweet Snow #2
Stage
Group A
Format
bo3

Login