Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • LoL
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 26m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
eSuba
2:1
FlameHard
  • Game 1 18–27 kills FLH
  • Game 2 24–13 kills ESB
  • Game 3 24–6 kills ESB
1564 +16 ENSI.Score before the match 1569 −16
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 35 minutes 18–27 kills FLH won
  2. Game 2 35 minutes 24–13 kills ESB won
  3. Game 3 28 minutes 24–6 kills ESB won

Player statistics

3 maps with player statistics · Kill participation and GPM are averages of the maps

eSuba
Player M K D A +/- KP CS Gold GPM Dmg More numbers
SaveroCzech Republic Jiří Odehnal 3 21 6 30 +15 77% 617 40,299 416 56,815
VespaFrance Marley Benezech 3 21 13 24 +8 68% 827 42,003 429 80,731
FadeTurkey Muhammed Fatih Kurşun 3 13 8 23 +5 55% 836 42,348 435 64,840
WelcomCzech Republic Hoang Quan Nguyen 3 9 10 24 -1 49% 700 37,659 386 59,454
FGGUnited Kingdom Gary Clarke 3 2 9 52 -7 81% 89 25,288 261 18,616
FlameHard
Player M K D A +/- KP CS Gold GPM Dmg More numbers
AvraGermany Ilhan Berkant 3 17 11 21 +6 73% 859 44,837 455 98,338
HeroicPortugal Francisco Ribeiro 3 17 12 12 +5 64% 805 41,327 417 89,529
CauchaPortugal Carlos Martinho 3 5 11 16 -6 40% 633 33,283 340 39,408
AnonymoussAustria Konstantin Kain 3 4 15 22 -11 62% 533 31,639 324 34,003
NioGermany Nick Kartamyschew 3 3 17 32 -14 75% 77 24,263 247 20,311

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · KP — Kill participation · CS — Creep score · Gold — Gold earned · GPM — Gold per minute · Dmg — Damage to champions

Lineups

eSuba

FlameHard

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

eSuba Now FlameHard
  1. Win against CKZ, Sep 17
  2. Loss against NBS, Sep 20
  3. Loss against HRTS, Sep 26
  4. Loss against BW, Sep 27
  5. Loss against LDS, Sep 28
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against ESB, Jun 09
  2. Win against GTZ, Sep 03
  3. Loss against OSC, Sep 09
  4. Win against CRZ, Sep 11
  5. Loss against VVV, Sep 24
4 losses Streak 1 loss
40% Winrate 10 60%
53% Winrate 30 74%
−13 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −14 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

eSuba FlameHard

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

eSuba FlameHard
2 Wins2 meetings 0
LoL T2 bo3 EMEA Group Stage Ended eSuba, Winner 2 FlameHard 1 Game 1 — 18–27 kills — Winner: FlameHard; Game 2 — 24–13 kills — Winner: eSuba; Game 3 — 24–6 kills — Winner: eSuba
LoL T2 bo3 EMEA Group Stage Ended FlameHard 1 eSuba, Winner 2 Game 1 — 20–11 kills — Winner: FlameHard; Game 2 — 16–25 kills — Winner: eSuba; Game 3 — 17–18 kills — Winner: eSuba

Teams Recent Performance

eSuba
LoL T2 bo1 EMEA Swiss Stage Ended eSuba 0 LODIS, Winner 1 Game 1 — 22–23 kills — Winner: LODIS
LoL T2 bo1 EMEA Swiss Stage Ended Bushido Wildcats, Winner 1 eSuba 0 Game 1 — 23–9 kills — Winner: Bushido Wildcats
LoL T2 bo1 EMEA Swiss Stage Ended Team Heretics Academy, Winner 1 eSuba 0 Game 1 — 23–4 kills — Winner: Team Heretics Academy
LoL T3 bo5 HPM Playoffs Ended Nightbirds, Winner 3 eSuba 0 Game 1 — 28–15 kills — Winner: Nightbirds; Game 2 — 19–8 kills — Winner: Nightbirds; Game 3 — 35–9 kills — Winner: Nightbirds
LoL T3 bo5 HPM Playoffs Ended CITA Kaizen 2 eSuba, Winner 3 Game 1 — 28–16 kills — Winner: CITA Kaizen; Game 2 — 26–41 kills — Winner: eSuba; Game 3 — 36–16 kills — Winner: CITA Kaizen; Game 4 — 31–35 kills — Winner: eSuba; Game 5 — 13–21 kills — Winner: eSuba
All eSuba Encounters
FlameHard
LoL T2 bo3 EMEA Last Chance Qualifier Ended Veni Vidi Vici, Winner 2 FlameHard 1 Game 1 — 7–11 kills — Winner: FlameHard; Game 2 — 18–11 kills — Winner: Veni Vidi Vici; Game 3 — 17–12 kills — Winner: Veni Vidi Vici
LoL T3 bo5 LPLOL Knockout Stage Ended FlameHard, Winner 3 Crusaders 0 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — 28–6 kills — Winner: FlameHard; Game 3 — 29–10 kills — Winner: FlameHard
LoL T3 bo5 LPLOL Knockout Stage Ended Odivelas Sports Club, Winner 3 FlameHard 2 Game 1 — 19–8 kills — Winner: Odivelas Sports Club; Game 2 — 24–15 kills — Winner: Odivelas Sports Club; Game 3 — 8–18 kills — Winner: FlameHard; Game 4 — 16–27 kills — Winner: FlameHard; Game 5 — 15–12 kills — Winner: Odivelas Sports Club
LoL T3 bo5 LPLOL Knockout Stage Ended FlameHard, Winner 3 GTZ Esports 0 Game 1 — 21–1 kills — Winner: FlameHard; Game 2 — 22–4 kills — Winner: FlameHard; Game 3 — 17–14 kills — Winner: FlameHard
LoL T2 bo3 EMEA Group Stage Ended eSuba, Winner 2 FlameHard 1 Game 1 — 18–27 kills — Winner: FlameHard; Game 2 — 24–13 kills — Winner: eSuba; Game 3 — 24–6 kills — Winner: eSuba
All FlameHard Encounters

Match VOD

Found on YouTube by the name of this match

  • LR VS KHK - MAPA 3 - GRUPOS DIA 5 - EMEA MASTERS - PRIMAVERA 2025 - LEAGUE OF LEGENDS

    LR VS KHK - MAPA 3 - GRUPOS DIA 5 - EMEA MASTERS - PRIMAVERA 2025 - LEAGUE OF LEGENDS

    LVPesLoL 88 views

  • LR VS KHK - MAPA 2 - GRUPOS DIA 5 - EMEA MASTERS - PRIMAVERA 2025 - LEAGUE OF LEGENDS

    LR VS KHK - MAPA 2 - GRUPOS DIA 5 - EMEA MASTERS - PRIMAVERA 2025 - LEAGUE OF LEGENDS

    LVPesLoL 58 views

  • Early comeback fight eSuba vs FlameHard | #hitpointcz v #Twitch

    Early comeback fight eSuba vs FlameHard | #hitpointcz v #Twitch

    hitpointcz 5 views

Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
1 year ago
Tournament
2025 EMEA Masters Spring
Stage
Group D
Format
bo3

Login