Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • LoL
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 14m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
FlyQuest NZXT
2:1
Cincinnati Fear
  • Game 1 25–6 kills FLY.NZXT
  • Game 2 4–20 kills FEAR
  • Game 3 16–6 kills FLY.NZXT
1555 +11 ENSI.Score before the match 1443 −11
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 25–6 kills FLY.NZXT won
  2. Game 2 4–20 kills FEAR won
  3. Game 3 16–6 kills FLY.NZXT won

No player statistics for this match in our sources.

Lineups

FlyQuest NZXT

Cincinnati Fear

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

FlyQuest NZXT Now Cincinnati Fear
  1. Win against CCG, Aug 11
  2. Win against TLC, Aug 18
  3. Loss against FxS, Aug 19
  4. Win against SN, Sep 01
  5. Loss against FxS, Sep 01
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against AOE, Mar 03
  2. Loss against MU, Mar 09
  3. Win against WC, Mar 15
  4. Loss against FLY.NZXT, Mar 17
  5. Loss against MU, Mar 23
1 loss Streak 2 losses
60% Winrate 10 40%
73% Winrate 30 50%
−13 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −10 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

FlyQuest NZXT Cincinnati Fear

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

FlyQuest NZXT Cincinnati Fear
3 Wins6 meetings · Draws: 1 2
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 1 Game 1 — 25–6 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 4–20 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 3 — 16–6 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 1 Game 1 — 23–10 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 22–32 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 3 — 20–22 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear
LoL T2 bo2 NACL Group Stage Draw Cincinnati Fear 1 FlyQuest NZXT 1 Game 1 — 9–25 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 23–9 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear
LoL T2 bo2 NACL Group Stage Ended Cincinnati Fear 0 FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Game 1 — 16–18 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 11–15 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
All FLY.NZXT and FEAR Encounters (6)

Teams Recent Performance

FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo5 NACL Playoffs Ended Fear x Starforge, Winner 3 FlyQuest NZXT 2 Game 1 — 14–8 kills — Winner: Fear x Starforge; Game 2 — 4–18 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 3 — 3–17 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 4 — 22–7 kills — Winner: Fear x Starforge; Game 5 — 5–15 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo5 NACL Playoffs Ended FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 3 Supernova 1 Game 1 — 20–4 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 24–4 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 3 — 9–19 kills — Winner: Supernova; Game 4 — 18–9 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Fear x Starforge, Winner 2 FlyQuest NZXT 1 Game 1 — 20–22 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 17–22 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 3 — 9–7 kills — Winner: Fear x Starforge
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Team Liquid Challengers 0 Game 1 — 20–14 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 20–11 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 CCG Esports 0 Game 1 — 19–4 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 27–11 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
All FlyQuest NZXT Encounters
Cincinnati Fear
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Cincinnati Fear 1 Maryville University, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–26 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 19–16 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 3 — 4–15 kills — Winner: Maryville University
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 1 Game 1 — 25–6 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 4–20 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 3 — 16–6 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Wildcard Gaming 1 Cincinnati Fear, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–22 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 14–5 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 3 — 20–19 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Maryville University, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 1 Game 1 — 16–6 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 5–20 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 3 — 17–4 kills — Winner: Maryville University
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Cincinnati Fear 1 Area of Effect Esports, Winner 2 Game 1 — 20–13 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 3–28 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 3 — 10–18 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports
All Cincinnati Fear Encounters

Other NACL matches

LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Wildcard Gaming 1 Cincinnati Fear, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–22 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 14–5 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 3 — 20–19 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Maryville University 1 Disguised, Winner 2 Game 1 — 12–8 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 2–13 kills — Winner: Disguised; Game 3 — 15–20 kills — Winner: Disguised
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Supernova 1 Team Liquid Challengers, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–7 kills — Winner: Supernova; Game 2 — 4–17 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers; Game 3 — 10–19 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Disguised 1 Team Liquid Challengers, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–2 kills — Winner: Disguised; Game 2 — 19–28 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers; Game 3 — 6–28 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Area of Effect Esports, Winner 2 Wildcard Gaming 0 Game 1 — 23–7 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 2 — 22–10 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Maryville University, Winner 2 Supernova 0 Game 1 — 15–10 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 17–7 kills — Winner: Maryville University
All NACL matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
2 years ago
Tournament
2024 North America Challengers League Spring
Stage
Bracket
Format
bo3

Login