Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • LoL
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 14m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Wildcard Gaming
1:2
Cincinnati Fear
  • Game 1 13–22 kills FEAR
  • Game 2 14–5 kills WC
  • Game 3 20–19 kills WC
1395 −14 ENSI.Score before the match 1429 +14
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 13–22 kills FEAR won
  2. Game 2 14–5 kills WC won
  3. Game 3 20–19 kills WC won

No player statistics for this match in our sources.

Lineups

Wildcard Gaming

Cincinnati Fear

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Wildcard Gaming Now Cincinnati Fear
  1. Win against FEAR, Feb 24
  2. Win against AOE, Mar 04
  3. Loss against SN, Mar 09
  4. Loss against FEAR, Mar 15
  5. Loss against AOE, Mar 17
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against AOE, Mar 03
  2. Loss against MU, Mar 09
  3. Win against WC, Mar 15
  4. Loss against FLY.NZXT, Mar 17
  5. Loss against MU, Mar 23
3 losses Streak 2 losses
30% Winrate 10 40%
33% Winrate 30 50%
−3 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −10 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Wildcard Gaming Cincinnati Fear

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Wildcard Gaming Cincinnati Fear
2 Wins6 meetings 4
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Wildcard Gaming 1 Cincinnati Fear, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–22 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 14–5 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 3 — 20–19 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 0 Game 1 — 24–17 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 2 — 26–18 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Cincinnati Fear, Winner 2 Wildcard Gaming 0 Game 1 — 15–10 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 22–6 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear
LoL T2 bo2 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming 0 Cincinnati Fear, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–20 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 5–19 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear
All WC and FEAR Encounters (6)

Teams Recent Performance

Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Area of Effect Esports, Winner 2 Wildcard Gaming 0 Game 1 — 23–7 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 2 — 22–10 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Wildcard Gaming 1 Cincinnati Fear, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–22 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 14–5 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 3 — 20–19 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming 0 Supernova, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–26 kills — Winner: Supernova; Game 2 — 8–28 kills — Winner: Supernova
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming, Winner 2 Area of Effect Esports 1 Game 1 — 18–9 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 2 — 6–16 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 3 — 15–14 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 0 Game 1 — 24–17 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 2 — 26–18 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
All Wildcard Gaming Encounters
Cincinnati Fear
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Cincinnati Fear 1 Maryville University, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–26 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 19–16 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 3 — 4–15 kills — Winner: Maryville University
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 1 Game 1 — 25–6 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 4–20 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 3 — 16–6 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Wildcard Gaming 1 Cincinnati Fear, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–22 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 14–5 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 3 — 20–19 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Maryville University, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 1 Game 1 — 16–6 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 5–20 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 3 — 17–4 kills — Winner: Maryville University
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Cincinnati Fear 1 Area of Effect Esports, Winner 2 Game 1 — 20–13 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 3–28 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 3 — 10–18 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports
All Cincinnati Fear Encounters

Other NACL matches

LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Area of Effect Esports 1 Game 1 — 13–2 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 16–22 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 3 — 29–34 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Maryville University 1 Disguised, Winner 2 Game 1 — 12–8 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 2–13 kills — Winner: Disguised; Game 3 — 15–20 kills — Winner: Disguised
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Supernova 1 Team Liquid Challengers, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–7 kills — Winner: Supernova; Game 2 — 4–17 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers; Game 3 — 10–19 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 1 Game 1 — 25–6 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 4–20 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 3 — 16–6 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Disguised 1 Team Liquid Challengers, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–2 kills — Winner: Disguised; Game 2 — 19–28 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers; Game 3 — 6–28 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Area of Effect Esports, Winner 2 Wildcard Gaming 0 Game 1 — 23–7 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 2 — 22–10 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports
All NACL matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
2 years ago
Tournament
2024 North America Challengers League Spring
Stage
Bracket
Format
bo3

Login