- T2
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 3h 16m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Anubis 14:16 Heroic
- Dust2 13:5 3DMAX
- Ancient 13:7 3DMAX
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
Heroic
Inferno
ban
-
3DMAX
Mirage
ban
-
Heroic
Anubis
pick
-
3DMAX
Dust2
pick
-
Heroic
Nuke
ban
-
3DMAX
Train
ban
- — Ancient decider
-
Anubis
Pick: Heroic
67 minutes
14:16
Heroic won
1st half 7–5
2nd half 7–8
OT 0–3
-
Dust2
Pick: 3DMAX
38 minutes
13:5
3DMAX won
1st half 8–4
2nd half 5–1
-
Ancient
Decider
41 minutes
13:7
3DMAX won
1st half 8–4
2nd half 5–3
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale3 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 56 | 44 | 18 | +12 | 57% | 90 | 75% | 6.82 | 7-5 | 18-11 | |
|
|
3 | 52 | 49 | 18 | +3 | 62% | 85 | 78% | 6.62 | 12-10 | 11-14 | |
|
|
3 | 48 | 42 | 19 | +6 | 40% | 79 | 74% | 6.52 | 6-5 | 11-11 | |
|
|
3 | 43 | 49 | 17 | -6 | 63% | 73 | 79% | 5.92 | 7-7 | 6-17 | |
|
|
3 | 41 | 37 | 14 | +4 | 66% | 58 | 72% | 5.87 | 3-6 | 11-9 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 48 | 47 | 21 | +1 | 50% | 89 | 75% | 6.49 | 8-8 | 6-9 | |
|
|
3 | 49 | 45 | 16 | +4 | 65% | 75 | 74% | 6.33 | 6-4 | 14-9 | |
|
|
3 | 46 | 46 | 8 | +0 | 39% | 62 | 75% | 5.84 | 5-4 | 10-12 | |
|
|
3 | 37 | 51 | 15 | -14 | 43% | 67 | 72% | 5.45 | 7-6 | 8-9 | |
|
|
3 | 40 | 52 | 12 | -12 | 48% | 65 | 63% | 5.24 | 7-13 | 8-12 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
29 | 20 | 6 | +9 | 52% | 100 | 77% | 6.95 | 2-3 | 10-2 | 17% | |
|
|
24 | 19 | 8 | +5 | 29% | 79 | 67% | 6.86 | 3-3 | 5-5 | 19% | |
|
|
19 | 25 | 8 | -6 | 42% | 79 | 80% | 5.86 | 3-3 | 2-10 | 19% | |
|
|
18 | 23 | 6 | -5 | 72% | 69 | 73% | 5.68 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 10% | |
|
|
11 | 20 | 7 | -9 | 73% | 48 | 67% | 4.56 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 16% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
28 | 19 | 5 | +9 | 32% | 83 | 83% | 7.04 | 4-1 | 6-3 | 31% | |
|
|
22 | 20 | 7 | +2 | 50% | 86 | 73% | 6.64 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 16% | |
|
|
21 | 17 | 10 | +4 | 62% | 77 | 80% | 6.63 | 3-2 | 6-6 | 19% | |
|
|
19 | 23 | 4 | -4 | 68% | 66 | 63% | 5.32 | 3-5 | 4-3 | 15% | |
|
|
16 | 22 | 7 | -6 | 31% | 64 | 73% | 5.31 | 3-4 | 3-5 | 26% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17 | 7 | 6 | +10 | 65% | 79 | 78% | 8.28 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 20% | |
|
|
14 | 12 | 4 | +2 | 50% | 87 | 72% | 6.93 | 3-1 | 5-4 | 16% | |
|
|
12 | 11 | 5 | +1 | 58% | 82 | 89% | 6.63 | 3-0 | 1-5 | 21% | |
|
|
11 | 11 | 6 | +0 | 55% | 59 | 78% | 5.94 | 3-5 | 2-5 | 11% | |
|
|
11 | 11 | 5 | +0 | 73% | 68 | 83% | 5.66 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 24% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
13 | 12 | 9 | +1 | 46% | 97 | 72% | 6.68 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 17% | |
|
|
12 | 13 | 1 | -1 | 58% | 70 | 61% | 5.66 | 2-2 | 5-1 | 16% | |
|
|
11 | 13 | 4 | -2 | 27% | 71 | 67% | 5.63 | 3-4 | 2-4 | 18% | |
|
|
8 | 13 | 0 | -5 | 63% | 53 | 78% | 5.13 | 1-1 | 2-6 | 22% | |
|
|
8 | 14 | 3 | -6 | 75% | 53 | 72% | 4.79 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 24% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23 | 15 | 6 | +8 | 57% | 133 | 85% | 8.63 | 5-1 | 3-4 | 19% | |
|
|
13 | 12 | 8 | +1 | 77% | 77 | 75% | 6.54 | 2-1 | 3-5 | 14% | |
|
|
13 | 13 | 4 | +0 | 85% | 68 | 75% | 6.26 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 22% | |
|
|
12 | 12 | 6 | +0 | 42% | 76 | 70% | 5.91 | 0-2 | 5-1 | 12% | |
|
|
13 | 10 | 1 | +3 | 62% | 55 | 75% | 5.65 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 19% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
16 | 15 | 5 | +1 | 75% | 78 | 75% | 6.47 | 1-0 | 3-2 | 18% | |
|
|
13 | 15 | 5 | -2 | 38% | 83 | 70% | 6.26 | 4-1 | 3-1 | 27% | |
|
|
13 | 15 | 5 | -2 | 54% | 89 | 80% | 6.10 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 19% | |
|
|
10 | 16 | 4 | -6 | 30% | 57 | 60% | 4.77 | 1-4 | 2-5 | 17% | |
|
|
10 | 14 | 3 | -4 | 40% | 39 | 60% | 4.68 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 16% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against IC, Sep 22
- Win against LG, Sep 23
- Loss against NiP, Sep 25
- Win against Alliance, Sep 26
- Loss against GL, Sep 27
- Win against JS, Sep 22
- Win against BBL, Sep 22
- Win against FNC, Sep 25
- Win against Sangal, Sep 26
- Win against 100T, Sep 26
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Wins: 1
Loses: 1
BBL Esports Wins: 1
-
Loses: 1
100 Thieves
Wins: 1
-
Wins: 1
HOTU
Wins: 1
-
Loses: 1
magic
Wins: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other IEM matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
3DMAX vs HEROIC - IEM Dallas 2025 EU Closed Qualifier
-
WINNER TO IEM DALLAS 2025! Heroic vs 3DMAX - HIGHLIGHTS - IEM Dallas 2025 CQ EU | CS2
-
[ES] Heroic - 3DMAX (bo3 clasificacion) | IEM Dallas CQ
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 1 year ago
- Tournament
- 2025 Intel Extreme Masters Dallas
- Stage
- Europe
- Format
- bo3