- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 2h 54m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Ancient 13:8 MOUZ
- Inferno 13:16 VP
- Mirage 13:2 MOUZ
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
VP
Nuke
ban
-
MOUZ
Anubis
ban
-
VP
Ancient
pick
-
MOUZ
Inferno
pick
-
VP
Train
ban
-
MOUZ
Dust2
ban
- — Mirage decider
-
Ancient
Pick: VP
45 minutes
13:8
MOUZ won
1st half 6–6
2nd half 7–2
-
Inferno
Pick: MOUZ
65 minutes
13:16
VP won
1st half 7–5
2nd half 6–9
OT 0–2
-
Mirage
Decider
31 minutes
13:2
MOUZ won
1st half 10–2
2nd half 3–0
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale3 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 50 | 37 | 19 | +13 | 44% | 84 | 82% | 6.81 | 16-11 | 12-13 | |
|
|
3 | 48 | 35 | 19 | +13 | 50% | 73 | 86% | 6.58 | 4-0 | 18-12 | |
|
|
3 | 50 | 39 | 17 | +11 | 42% | 81 | 83% | 6.53 | 3-4 | 10-12 | |
|
|
3 | 45 | 33 | 18 | +12 | 33% | 80 | 82% | 6.52 | 8-1 | 10-7 | |
|
|
3 | 35 | 40 | 17 | -5 | 54% | 71 | 72% | 5.63 | 7-11 | 5-13 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 45 | 40 | 7 | +5 | 40% | 68 | 72% | 6.14 | 5-3 | 18-5 | |
|
|
3 | 38 | 45 | 12 | -7 | 50% | 61 | 69% | 5.69 | 7-5 | 11-9 | |
|
|
3 | 28 | 45 | 13 | -17 | 54% | 62 | 74% | 5.44 | 6-7 | 6-14 | |
|
|
3 | 32 | 50 | 20 | -18 | 34% | 68 | 69% | 5.30 | 4-11 | 5-12 | |
|
|
3 | 33 | 56 | 6 | -23 | 67% | 65 | 66% | 5.15 | 5-12 | 6-14 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18 | 11 | 6 | +7 | 39% | 95 | 90% | 7.48 | 3-0 | 5-3 | 22% | |
|
|
20 | 15 | 8 | +5 | 25% | 105 | 81% | 7.35 | 6-3 | 2-5 | 25% | |
|
|
18 | 12 | 7 | +6 | 50% | 88 | 81% | 7.00 | 2-2 | 6-2 | 21% | |
|
|
15 | 11 | 3 | +4 | 53% | 67 | 90% | 6.43 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 14% | |
|
|
11 | 13 | 6 | -2 | 36% | 72 | 76% | 5.62 | 2-3 | 1-5 | 17% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18 | 19 | 6 | -1 | 50% | 97 | 71% | 7.26 | 5-1 | 3-4 | 24% | |
|
|
19 | 13 | 1 | +6 | 37% | 79 | 76% | 7.00 | 1-2 | 11-3 | 23% | |
|
|
9 | 18 | 6 | -9 | 11% | 68 | 62% | 4.91 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 36% | |
|
|
7 | 16 | 5 | -9 | 29% | 55 | 76% | 4.77 | 0-1 | 1-7 | 14% | |
|
|
7 | 19 | 2 | -12 | 43% | 44 | 67% | 4.05 | 1-5 | 1-7 | 22% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20 | 16 | 8 | +4 | 45% | 69 | 83% | 6.29 | 1-0 | 8-4 | 16% | |
|
|
15 | 17 | 8 | -2 | 27% | 66 | 66% | 5.65 | 3-1 | 2-3 | 13% | |
|
|
15 | 16 | 6 | -1 | 53% | 57 | 72% | 5.54 | 5-7 | 6-4 | 11% | |
|
|
14 | 19 | 7 | -5 | 57% | 70 | 62% | 5.27 | 3-7 | 1-6 | 19% | |
|
|
14 | 20 | 7 | -6 | 36% | 59 | 79% | 5.13 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 22% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21 | 13 | 4 | +8 | 38% | 74 | 79% | 6.66 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 20% | |
|
|
18 | 18 | 12 | +0 | 39% | 83 | 76% | 6.53 | 3-1 | 2-4 | 24% | |
|
|
17 | 22 | 3 | -5 | 71% | 78 | 66% | 5.91 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 25% | |
|
|
13 | 17 | 6 | -4 | 54% | 64 | 72% | 5.60 | 6-6 | 1-5 | 14% | |
|
|
13 | 12 | 4 | +1 | 38% | 41 | 69% | 5.07 | 1-1 | 6-1 | 15% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18 | 7 | 3 | +11 | 39% | 114 | 93% | 8.57 | 1-0 | 0-5 | 22% | |
|
|
15 | 6 | 5 | +9 | 60% | 106 | 100% | 8.49 | 5-1 | 4-4 | 13% | |
|
|
13 | 8 | 8 | +5 | 54% | 91 | 87% | 7.37 | 3-0 | 4-3 | 18% | |
|
|
12 | 5 | 4 | +7 | 33% | 88 | 100% | 6.86 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 23% | |
|
|
10 | 8 | 4 | +2 | 70% | 71 | 87% | 6.33 | 2-1 | 3-2 | 20% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
8 | 12 | 2 | -4 | 75% | 70 | 73% | 6.06 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 25% | |
|
|
9 | 15 | 1 | -6 | 78% | 72 | 67% | 5.23 | 1-4 | 3-3 | 17% | |
|
|
7 | 14 | 2 | -7 | 71% | 50 | 67% | 4.69 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 19% | |
|
|
5 | 14 | 2 | -9 | 60% | 39 | 53% | 3.92 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 22% | |
|
|
5 | 14 | 2 | -9 | 60% | 40 | 67% | 3.48 | 0-6 | 1-4 | 36% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against FURIA, Oct 04
- Win against Spirit, Oct 05
- Win against FURIA, Oct 09
- Win against Spirit, Oct 10
- Loss against Vitality, Oct 11
- Win against Fokus, Sep 12
- Win against Heroic, Sep 13
- Win against HOTU, Sep 13
- Loss against BBL, Sep 22
- Loss against JS, Sep 22
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other PGL matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
Day 5 | PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025 Group Stage |🎙КРИВОЙ ЭФИР
-
PGL CLUJ-NAPOCA 2025 - 3DMax vs SAW | MOUZ vs Virtus.pro
-
[RU] Astralis vs BIG | 3DMAX vs SAW | MOUZ vs Virtus.pro | PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025: Групповая Стадия
-
[UA] MOUZ проти Virtus.pro | PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025 - Group Stage
-
Group Stage Day 5 | PGL Cluj Napoca 2025 [FIL]
-
Astralis vs. BIG, 3DMAX vs. SAW, MOUZ vs. VirtusPro | Ronda 5 | PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025
-
Virtus pro vs MOUZ - PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025 - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ CS2 | КРИВОЙ ЭФИР
-
WINNER TO PLAYOFFS! MOUZ vs Virtus.pro – HIGHLIGHTS - PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025 | CS2
-
MOUZ проти Virtus.pro | Карта 3 | PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025
-
MOUZ vs Virtus.pro - PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025
-
ПОСЛЕДНИЙ ШАНС ДЛЯ VP! Virtus.Pro vs MOUZ. ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ — PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025
-
Смоук от s1mple на выход Б плента #cs2 #simple #mirage #shorts
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 1 year ago
- Tournament
- 2025 PGL on FiRe Buenos Aires
- Stage
- Swiss
- Format
- bo3