- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 1h 40m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Ancient 4:13 GL
- Inferno 8:13 GL
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
GL
Dust2
ban
-
3DMAX
Mirage
ban
-
GL
Ancient
pick
-
3DMAX
Inferno
pick
-
GL
Anubis
ban
-
3DMAX
Train
ban
- — Nuke decider
-
Ancient
Pick: GL
39 minutes
4:13
GL won
1st half 2–10
2nd half 2–3
-
Inferno
Pick: 3DMAX
44 minutes
8:13
GL won
1st half 4–8
2nd half 4–5
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale2 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 23 | 26 | 9 | -3 | 35% | 67 | 74% | 5.95 | 5-2 | 6-4 | |
|
|
2 | 23 | 31 | 6 | -8 | 74% | 77 | 71% | 5.61 | 4-8 | 3-7 | |
|
|
2 | 21 | 30 | 8 | -9 | 57% | 60 | 84% | 5.16 | 0-2 | 7-8 | |
|
|
2 | 20 | 30 | 7 | -10 | 70% | 66 | 71% | 5.04 | 3-8 | 4-8 | |
|
|
2 | 18 | 29 | 3 | -11 | 61% | 58 | 53% | 4.99 | 2-4 | 5-5 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 36 | 22 | 6 | +14 | 58% | 98 | 87% | 7.71 | 8-4 | 7-8 | |
|
|
2 | 31 | 19 | 17 | +12 | 71% | 83 | 89% | 7.32 | 3-1 | 6-9 | |
|
|
2 | 28 | 16 | 5 | +12 | 18% | 76 | 89% | 6.78 | 3-2 | 10-6 | |
|
|
2 | 27 | 26 | 15 | +1 | 59% | 83 | 79% | 6.66 | 5-2 | 6-10 | |
|
|
2 | 21 | 25 | 15 | -4 | 71% | 62 | 71% | 5.73 | 5-5 | 4-6 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
14 | 12 | 3 | +2 | 64% | 85 | 88% | 6.35 | 0-0 | 7-1 | 23% | |
|
|
9 | 13 | 4 | -4 | 44% | 62 | 65% | 5.41 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 15% | |
|
|
10 | 16 | 1 | -6 | 80% | 72 | 65% | 5.33 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 10% | |
|
|
10 | 15 | 4 | -5 | 80% | 77 | 76% | 5.26 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 19% | |
|
|
6 | 16 | 3 | -10 | 33% | 49 | 53% | 4.25 | 0-1 | 0-6 | 20% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17 | 9 | 5 | +8 | 71% | 99 | 94% | 8.52 | 2-0 | 2-3 | 12% | |
|
|
19 | 13 | 1 | +6 | 63% | 116 | 76% | 8.09 | 5-4 | 3-4 | 20% | |
|
|
17 | 8 | 2 | +9 | 29% | 101 | 88% | 7.96 | 1-0 | 6-3 | 24% | |
|
|
8 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 75% | 64 | 82% | 5.90 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 16% | |
|
|
10 | 11 | 4 | -1 | 70% | 63 | 76% | 5.82 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 16% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
14 | 13 | 5 | +1 | 29% | 71 | 81% | 6.38 | 3-1 | 4-1 | 16% | |
|
|
13 | 15 | 5 | -2 | 69% | 81 | 76% | 5.84 | 0-4 | 2-5 | 14% | |
|
|
12 | 13 | 0 | -1 | 75% | 66 | 52% | 5.58 | 2-3 | 5--1 | 17% | |
|
|
10 | 15 | 3 | -5 | 60% | 58 | 67% | 4.87 | 2-4 | 1-4 | 21% | |
|
|
7 | 18 | 5 | -11 | 43% | 39 | 81% | 4.19 | 0-2 | 0-7 | 20% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17 | 9 | 5 | +8 | 53% | 84 | 95% | 7.40 | 3-0 | 4-4 | 24% | |
|
|
17 | 15 | 11 | +2 | 53% | 99 | 81% | 7.34 | 3-0 | 4-7 | 15% | |
|
|
14 | 10 | 12 | +4 | 71% | 71 | 86% | 6.35 | 1-1 | 4-6 | 10% | |
|
|
11 | 8 | 3 | +3 | 0% | 55 | 90% | 5.82 | 2-2 | 4-3 | 13% | |
|
|
13 | 16 | 5 | -3 | 69% | 60 | 62% | 5.60 | 5-4 | 1-3 | 16% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against IC, Sep 22
- Win against LG, Sep 23
- Loss against NiP, Sep 25
- Win against Alliance, Sep 26
- Loss against GL, Sep 27
- Loss against magic, Sep 26
- Win against 3DMAX, Sep 27
- Win against Sinners, Sep 27
- Win against magic, Sep 28
- Loss against NiP, Sep 28
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Loses: 1
Ninjas in Pyjamas
Wins: 1
Loses: 1
-
Wins: 1
Luminosity Gaming
Wins: 2
-
Loses: 1
magic
Wins: 1
Loses: 1
-
Wins: 1
M80
Loses: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other IEMK matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
GamerLegion vs 3DMAX - IEM Melbourne 2025 - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ CS2 | КРИВОЙ ЭФИР
-
Sl3nd's AWP Domination: 4k Against Full Buy!
-
3DMAX проти GamerLegion | Карта 2 | IEM Melbourne 2025
-
☢️ REZ TAP KING vs 3DMAX! | IEM Melbourne 2025 | Ancient POV
-
PR's Quad Kill Defuses the Bomb in Style!
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 1 year ago
- Tournament
- 2025 Intel Extreme Masters Spring
- Stage
- Group A
- Format
- bo3