- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 3h 9m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Anubis 6:13 Liquid
- Inferno 13:10 Na'Vi
- Ancient 8:13 Liquid
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
Liquid
Train
ban
-
Na'Vi
Mirage
ban
-
Liquid
Anubis
pick
-
Na'Vi
Inferno
pick
-
Liquid
Nuke
ban
-
Na'Vi
Dust2
ban
- — Ancient decider
-
Anubis
Pick: Liquid
46 minutes
6:13
Liquid won
1st half 4–8
2nd half 2–5
-
Inferno
Pick: Na'Vi
28 minutes
13:10
Na'Vi won
1st half 11–1
2nd half 2–9
-
Ancient
Decider
46 minutes
8:13
Liquid won
1st half 5–7
2nd half 3–6
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale3 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 53 | 39 | 12 | +14 | 36% | 81 | 70% | 7.01 | 6-2 | 9-7 | |
|
|
3 | 41 | 46 | 22 | -5 | 68% | 88 | 78% | 6.34 | 8-14 | 10-12 | |
|
|
3 | 38 | 41 | 5 | -3 | 53% | 58 | 70% | 5.67 | 5-5 | 7-6 | |
|
|
3 | 31 | 44 | 14 | -13 | 58% | 68 | 78% | 5.61 | 4-3 | 8-12 | |
|
|
3 | 35 | 46 | 16 | -11 | 49% | 69 | 70% | 5.51 | 7-9 | 9-9 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 45 | 42 | 15 | +3 | 71% | 83 | 70% | 6.58 | 7-6 | 2-11 | |
|
|
3 | 49 | 41 | 10 | +8 | 57% | 79 | 81% | 6.45 | 6-2 | 9-8 | |
|
|
3 | 43 | 40 | 9 | +3 | 40% | 69 | 73% | 6.17 | 11-4 | 8-6 | |
|
|
3 | 40 | 39 | 14 | +1 | 50% | 72 | 71% | 5.78 | 7-11 | 7-5 | |
|
|
3 | 35 | 39 | 18 | -4 | 37% | 73 | 71% | 5.55 | 2-7 | 8-9 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
16 | 13 | 2 | +3 | 31% | 71 | 63% | 6.82 | 3-0 | 2-2 | 16% | |
|
|
12 | 15 | 7 | -3 | 67% | 86 | 79% | 5.87 | 2-5 | 5-3 | 15% | |
|
|
11 | 19 | 4 | -8 | 55% | 78 | 79% | 5.56 | 1-2 | 4-7 | 20% | |
|
|
8 | 15 | 3 | -7 | 38% | 63 | 53% | 4.73 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 19% | |
|
|
7 | 15 | 2 | -8 | 43% | 34 | 63% | 3.79 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 11% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
16 | 10 | 6 | +6 | 88% | 106 | 89% | 7.95 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 15% | |
|
|
15 | 11 | 12 | +4 | 40% | 112 | 95% | 6.84 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 19% | |
|
|
17 | 12 | 3 | +5 | 35% | 74 | 74% | 6.82 | 4-1 | 4-3 | 27% | |
|
|
17 | 11 | 2 | +6 | 47% | 77 | 89% | 6.79 | 2-0 | 3-3 | 17% | |
|
|
12 | 11 | 5 | +1 | 33% | 67 | 79% | 5.98 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 18% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
16 | 14 | 9 | +2 | 81% | 99 | 91% | 7.47 | 3-4 | 3-6 | 16% | |
|
|
19 | 8 | 1 | +11 | 42% | 73 | 87% | 7.37 | 2-1 | 4-1 | 20% | |
|
|
20 | 13 | 3 | +7 | 50% | 80 | 70% | 7.35 | 2-1 | 6-3 | 15% | |
|
|
8 | 11 | 5 | -3 | 63% | 50 | 83% | 5.21 | 2-1 | 1-3 | 13% | |
|
|
10 | 16 | 9 | -6 | 60% | 56 | 70% | 5.12 | 3-4 | 2-6 | 21% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20 | 13 | 1 | +7 | 55% | 80 | 83% | 6.87 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 15% | |
|
|
14 | 16 | 6 | -2 | 71% | 77 | 57% | 6.53 | 5-2 | 1-4 | 13% | |
|
|
13 | 13 | 3 | +0 | 31% | 63 | 74% | 5.89 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 19% | |
|
|
8 | 16 | 7 | -8 | 63% | 54 | 65% | 4.44 | 0-4 | 2-1 | 9% | |
|
|
6 | 15 | 1 | -9 | 67% | 37 | 57% | 4.11 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 13% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17 | 13 | 7 | +4 | 24% | 92 | 76% | 6.80 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 30% | |
|
|
17 | 15 | 4 | +2 | 47% | 87 | 86% | 6.64 | 4-2 | 5-1 | 20% | |
|
|
12 | 14 | 5 | -2 | 58% | 80 | 71% | 6.10 | 1-0 | 3-2 | 11% | |
|
|
13 | 17 | 6 | -4 | 54% | 76 | 62% | 5.52 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 10% | |
|
|
12 | 18 | 2 | -6 | 75% | 63 | 57% | 5.50 | 3-1 | 1-4 | 13% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20 | 12 | 2 | +8 | 55% | 97 | 71% | 7.08 | 3-4 | 4-1 | 16% | |
|
|
14 | 13 | 5 | +1 | 21% | 77 | 67% | 5.97 | 1-2 | 3-1 | 15% | |
|
|
13 | 15 | 3 | -2 | 54% | 71 | 71% | 5.89 | 3-0 | 2-2 | 17% | |
|
|
12 | 17 | 7 | -5 | 75% | 80 | 71% | 5.68 | 2-2 | 3-4 | 16% | |
|
|
15 | 16 | 3 | -1 | 53% | 68 | 67% | 5.39 | 0-4 | 0-5 | 16% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Loss against Aurora, Sep 17
- Loss against MOUZ, Sep 18
- Win against G2, Oct 03
- Loss against Vitality, Oct 04
- Win against 9z, Oct 05
- Loss against BBL, Sep 18
- Win against CCE, Sep 25
- Win against NRG, Sep 25
- Win against M80, Sep 26
- Win against Wildcard, Sep 27
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other IEMK matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
LIVE: Team Liquid vs NAVI - IEM Melbourne 2025 - Group B
-
[UA] NAVI проти Liquid | IEM Melbourne
-
Team Liquid [2:1] Natus Vincere | IEM Melbourne 2025 | STREAM 3 | PARAGON | CS2
-
Team Liquid [2:1] Natus Vincere | IEM Melbourne 2025 | RED ZONE | PARAGON | СS2
-
#shorts de_dust2 smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_dust2 smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_dust2 smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_dust2 smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_dust2 smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_anubis smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_anubis smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_anubis smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_anubis smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_anubis smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
-
#shorts de_anubis smoke #cs2major #cs2clips #cs2faceit #cs2 #counterstrike2 #csgo
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 1 year ago
- Tournament
- 2025 Intel Extreme Masters Spring
- Stage
- Group B
- Format
- bo3