- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 1h 56m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Inferno 5:13 FURIA
- Mirage 11:13 FURIA
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
FURIA
Ancient
ban
-
Falcons
Overpass
ban
-
FURIA
Inferno
pick
-
Falcons
Mirage
pick
-
FURIA
Dust2
ban
-
Falcons
Train
ban
- — Nuke decider
-
Inferno
Pick: FURIA
46 minutes
5:13
FURIA won
1st half 2–10
2nd half 3–3
-
Mirage
Pick: Falcons
55 minutes
11:13
FURIA won
1st half 7–5
2nd half 4–8
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale2 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 50 | 47 | 6 | +3 | 54% | 114 | 69% | 7.51 | 3-9 | 13-12 | |
|
|
2 | 45 | 46 | 8 | -1 | 49% | 107 | 67% | 7.35 | 7-7 | 9-9 | |
|
|
2 | 40 | 39 | 7 | +1 | 65% | 98 | 64% | 7.30 | 15-6 | 8-7 | |
|
|
2 | 22 | 44 | 20 | -22 | 64% | 84 | 74% | 5.44 | 0-4 | 7-14 | |
|
|
2 | 26 | 44 | 16 | -18 | 38% | 71 | 69% | 5.22 | 2-7 | 8-8 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 41 | 37 | 20 | +4 | 49% | 107 | 71% | 7.56 | 9-4 | 8-7 | |
|
|
2 | 57 | 37 | 23 | +20 | 32% | 150 | 79% | 7.51 | 6-4 | 12-10 | |
|
|
2 | 37 | 32 | 20 | +5 | 73% | 107 | 88% | 7.45 | 11-5 | 3-8 | |
|
|
2 | 40 | 38 | 13 | +2 | 28% | 94 | 74% | 7.38 | 6-7 | 6-12 | |
|
|
2 | 45 | 39 | 17 | +6 | 76% | 105 | 71% | 6.96 | 1-7 | 14-7 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
28 | 30 | 6 | -2 | 43% | 152 | 61% | 8.97 | 6-6 | 4-6 | 20% | |
|
|
24 | 22 | 6 | +2 | 67% | 137 | 67% | 8.86 | 10-4 | 4-4 | 15% | |
|
|
24 | 30 | 4 | -6 | 50% | 140 | 61% | 7.84 | 0-6 | 10-10 | 20% | |
|
|
14 | 28 | 12 | -14 | 71% | 124 | 72% | 6.26 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 14% | |
|
|
14 | 26 | 6 | -12 | 29% | 86 | 61% | 5.38 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 16% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
42 | 22 | 18 | +20 | 29% | 266 | 83% | 10.00 | 6-2 | 8-6 | 21% | |
|
|
32 | 22 | 12 | +10 | 88% | 173 | 83% | 9.24 | 0-6 | 10-4 | 17% | |
|
|
22 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 73% | 138 | 83% | 9.04 | 8-2 | 2-4 | 14% | |
|
|
24 | 20 | 10 | +4 | 50% | 133 | 67% | 8.66 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 16% | |
|
|
16 | 24 | 8 | -8 | 13% | 99 | 78% | 6.64 | 2-4 | 2-10 | 11% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26 | 17 | 2 | +9 | 58% | 94 | 75% | 7.26 | 3-3 | 3-2 | 23% | |
|
|
17 | 16 | 2 | +1 | 59% | 73 | 71% | 6.13 | 1-1 | 5-3 | 15% | |
|
|
16 | 17 | 1 | -1 | 63% | 68 | 63% | 6.13 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 13% | |
|
|
12 | 18 | 10 | -6 | 50% | 61 | 75% | 5.10 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 21% | |
|
|
8 | 16 | 8 | -8 | 50% | 54 | 75% | 4.82 | 0-2 | 1-6 | 14% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24 | 14 | 5 | +10 | 38% | 91 | 71% | 7.93 | 4-3 | 4-2 | 24% | |
|
|
17 | 17 | 10 | +0 | 47% | 87 | 75% | 6.74 | 5-2 | 4-5 | 20% | |
|
|
15 | 16 | 10 | -1 | 73% | 85 | 92% | 6.26 | 3-3 | 1-4 | 19% | |
|
|
15 | 15 | 5 | +0 | 40% | 63 | 75% | 5.64 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 19% | |
|
|
13 | 17 | 5 | -4 | 46% | 54 | 63% | 5.25 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 16% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against TyLoo, Oct 03
- Win against Aurora, Oct 04
- Loss against Vitality, Oct 05
- Win against Na'Vi, Oct 06
- Loss against Spirit, Oct 09
- Loss against MOUZ, Oct 04
- Win against PARIVISION, Oct 05
- Loss against Aurora, Oct 06
- Win against 9z, Oct 07
- Loss against MOUZ, Oct 09
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Wins: 1
Loses: 1
Legacy
Loses: 2
-
Loses: 1
Team Vitality
Loses: 3
-
Loses: 1
MOUZ
Wins: 1
Loses: 2
-
Loses: 2
Team Spirit
Loses: 1
-
Wins: 1
Aurora Gaming
Wins: 1
Loses: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other IEM matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
[UA] Falcons проти FURIA | IEM Chengdu 2025
-
[FIL] Team Falcons vs FURIA - IEM Chengdu 2025 Semifinals
-
[CS2] IEM Chengdu - Polufinale - Falcons vs Furia - !discord !ggdrop
-
ПОЛУФИНАЛ! Falcons vs FURIA - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - IEM Chengdu 2025 l КС2
-
Falcons проти FURIA | Карта 2 | IEM Chengdu 2025
-
куда лезем братик?
-
xorazmcs2 (juzi) mk11
-
🔴 Team Falcons vs MOUZ - Bình luận tiếng việt IEM Chengdu 2025 | Ngày 5 - Chung kết
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 11 months ago
- Tournament
- 2025 Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu
- Stage
- Bracket
- Format
- bo3