- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 1h 27m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Overpass 3:13 3DMAX
- Anubis 4:13 3DMAX
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
BC.G
Inferno
ban
-
3DMAX
Mirage
ban
-
BC.G
Overpass
pick
-
3DMAX
Anubis
pick
-
BC.G
Ancient
ban
-
3DMAX
Nuke
ban
- — Dust2 decider
-
Overpass
Pick: BC.G
35 minutes
3:13
3DMAX won
1st half 3–9
2nd half 0–4
-
Anubis
Pick: 3DMAX
37 minutes
4:13
3DMAX won
1st half 3–9
2nd half 1–4
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale2 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 19 | 28 | 6 | -9 | 37% | 72 | 64% | 5.51 | 2-4 | 9-3 | |
|
|
2 | 20 | 28 | 6 | -8 | 65% | 67 | 58% | 5.41 | 1-4 | 5-5 | |
|
|
2 | 19 | 26 | 5 | -7 | 42% | 60 | 61% | 5.32 | 2-4 | 3-4 | |
|
|
2 | 7 | 29 | 5 | -22 | 57% | 39 | 55% | 3.73 | 1-5 | 2-7 | |
|
|
2 | 8 | 26 | 5 | -18 | 25% | 34 | 42% | 3.39 | 0-10 | 2-5 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 37 | 13 | 15 | +24 | 49% | 130 | 88% | 8.75 | 7-0 | 5-2 | |
|
|
2 | 32 | 14 | 15 | +18 | 50% | 101 | 82% | 7.51 | 4-2 | 6-5 | |
|
|
2 | 22 | 9 | 10 | +13 | 41% | 63 | 82% | 6.68 | 6-2 | 2-2 | |
|
|
2 | 23 | 20 | 7 | +3 | 35% | 73 | 79% | 6.31 | 6-0 | 1-5 | |
|
|
2 | 23 | 17 | 6 | +6 | 39% | 67 | 82% | 6.18 | 4-2 | 3-4 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
11 | 13 | 1 | -2 | 27% | 72 | 75% | 5.88 | 1-2 | 5-2 | 14% | |
|
|
5 | 14 | 3 | -9 | 60% | 37 | 44% | 3.94 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 23% | |
|
|
5 | 13 | 2 | -8 | 40% | 42 | 50% | 3.86 | 1-3 | 1-0 | 11% | |
|
|
4 | 13 | 3 | -9 | 25% | 35 | 38% | 3.37 | 0-5 | 1-3 | 26% | |
|
|
1 | 15 | 3 | -14 | 100% | 33 | 38% | 3.34 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 9% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18 | 5 | 7 | +13 | 33% | 115 | 94% | 7.99 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 17% | |
|
|
13 | 5 | 9 | +8 | 54% | 106 | 88% | 7.70 | 2-0 | 2-2 | 14% | |
|
|
12 | 2 | 6 | +10 | 42% | 79 | 94% | 7.24 | 4-0 | 1-0 | 20% | |
|
|
15 | 8 | 4 | +7 | 40% | 84 | 94% | 7.23 | 4-0 | 1-1 | 28% | |
|
|
10 | 6 | 0 | +4 | 50% | 49 | 94% | 5.40 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 12% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
15 | 14 | 3 | +1 | 67% | 94 | 71% | 6.79 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 21% | |
|
|
14 | 13 | 3 | +1 | 43% | 77 | 71% | 6.70 | 1-1 | 2-4 | 22% | |
|
|
8 | 15 | 5 | -7 | 50% | 72 | 53% | 5.16 | 1-2 | 4-1 | 21% | |
|
|
6 | 14 | 2 | -8 | 50% | 44 | 71% | 4.09 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 19% | |
|
|
4 | 13 | 2 | -9 | 25% | 33 | 47% | 3.41 | 0-5 | 1-2 | 19% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24 | 8 | 6 | +16 | 46% | 153 | 88% | 9.73 | 5-0 | 3-0 | 29% | |
|
|
14 | 9 | 8 | +5 | 71% | 88 | 71% | 7.05 | 2-1 | 4-3 | 16% | |
|
|
13 | 11 | 6 | +2 | 31% | 84 | 71% | 6.92 | 3-0 | 3-3 | 25% | |
|
|
10 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 40% | 48 | 71% | 6.15 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 9% | |
|
|
8 | 12 | 3 | -4 | 25% | 63 | 65% | 5.45 | 2-0 | 0-4 | 38% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against GLITCH, Oct 02
- Loss against Prestige, Oct 02
- Win against Voca, Oct 02
- Win against BSM, Oct 02
- Win against Sashi, Oct 02
- Win against IC, Sep 22
- Win against LG, Sep 23
- Loss against NiP, Sep 25
- Win against Alliance, Sep 26
- Loss against GL, Sep 27
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Loses: 1
100 Thieves
Loses: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other IEM matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
HIGHLIGHTS 👉NiP проти Passion UA | IEM Kraków 2026
-
ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ ВО 2-Й ЭТАП! BC.Game vs 3DMAX - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - IEM Krakow 2026 l КС2
-
BC.Game проти 3DMAX | Карта 2 | IEM Kraków 2026 Stage 1
-
ПРОИГРАВШИЙ ВЫБЫВАЕТ! NiP vs Passion UA - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - IEM Krakow 2026 l КС2
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 8 months ago
- Tournament
- 2026 Intel Extreme Masters Kraków
- Stage
- Bracket
- Format
- bo3