- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 2h 34m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Inferno 19:15 Falcons
- Ancient 13:11 Falcons
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
M80
Nuke
ban
-
Falcons
Overpass
ban
-
M80
Inferno
pick
-
Falcons
Ancient
pick
-
Falcons
Anubis
ban
-
M80
Dust2
ban
- — Mirage decider
-
Inferno
Pick: M80
83 minutes
19:15
Falcons won
1st half 5–7
2nd half 8–7
OT 6–1
-
Ancient
Pick: Falcons
49 minutes
13:11
Falcons won
1st half 4–8
2nd half 9–3
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale2 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 52 | 26 | 8 | +26 | 38% | 84 | 79% | 7.36 | 11-5 | 9-4 | |
|
|
2 | 40 | 33 | 19 | +7 | 55% | 75 | 83% | 6.44 | 5-3 | 4-7 | |
|
|
2 | 42 | 40 | 20 | +2 | 57% | 79 | 74% | 6.25 | 7-8 | 9-11 | |
|
|
2 | 33 | 36 | 11 | -3 | 67% | 62 | 66% | 5.40 | 3-4 | 9-4 | |
|
|
2 | 30 | 39 | 22 | -9 | 43% | 62 | 79% | 5.38 | 4-8 | 2-12 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 37 | 42 | 15 | -5 | 51% | 76 | 76% | 6.07 | 7-9 | 9-12 | |
|
|
2 | 39 | 43 | 10 | -4 | 59% | 66 | 69% | 5.87 | 7-9 | 9-11 | |
|
|
2 | 32 | 33 | 18 | -1 | 63% | 59 | 71% | 5.86 | 6-1 | 7-9 | |
|
|
2 | 34 | 37 | 10 | -3 | 29% | 68 | 69% | 5.81 | 4-2 | 8-8 | |
|
|
2 | 31 | 42 | 12 | -11 | 68% | 69 | 72% | 5.72 | 4-9 | 7-12 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27 | 21 | 11 | +6 | 44% | 80 | 82% | 6.88 | 3-2 | 3-6 | 13% | |
|
|
25 | 17 | 3 | +8 | 32% | 72 | 74% | 6.50 | 6-4 | 5-2 | 14% | |
|
|
20 | 21 | 15 | -1 | 35% | 72 | 91% | 6.01 | 2-5 | 1-9 | 17% | |
|
|
22 | 22 | 9 | +0 | 73% | 65 | 76% | 5.84 | 3-5 | 7-6 | 10% | |
|
|
16 | 21 | 7 | -5 | 69% | 56 | 68% | 5.18 | 2-2 | 5-3 | 16% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21 | 19 | 5 | +2 | 29% | 73 | 74% | 6.36 | 3-0 | 5-5 | 32% | |
|
|
22 | 23 | 9 | -1 | 41% | 75 | 79% | 6.20 | 3-4 | 7-8 | 14% | |
|
|
20 | 24 | 6 | -4 | 70% | 72 | 71% | 5.98 | 3-4 | 3-6 | 24% | |
|
|
18 | 18 | 15 | +0 | 50% | 57 | 74% | 5.91 | 3-0 | 7-4 | 12% | |
|
|
20 | 26 | 6 | -6 | 60% | 60 | 62% | 5.59 | 6-8 | 4-9 | 17% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27 | 9 | 5 | +18 | 44% | 102 | 88% | 8.57 | 5-1 | 4-2 | 24% | |
|
|
20 | 18 | 11 | +2 | 40% | 99 | 71% | 6.83 | 4-3 | 2-5 | 12% | |
|
|
13 | 12 | 8 | +1 | 77% | 68 | 83% | 5.81 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 11% | |
|
|
17 | 15 | 4 | +2 | 65% | 70 | 63% | 5.72 | 1-2 | 4-1 | 22% | |
|
|
10 | 18 | 7 | -8 | 60% | 47 | 63% | 4.48 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 13% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19 | 17 | 4 | +2 | 58% | 74 | 79% | 6.26 | 1-1 | 5-2 | 18% | |
|
|
15 | 19 | 6 | -4 | 67% | 77 | 71% | 5.88 | 4-5 | 2-4 | 18% | |
|
|
14 | 15 | 3 | -1 | 79% | 63 | 67% | 5.79 | 3-1 | 0-5 | 12% | |
|
|
11 | 18 | 6 | -7 | 64% | 65 | 75% | 5.35 | 1-5 | 4-6 | 25% | |
|
|
13 | 18 | 5 | -5 | 31% | 61 | 63% | 5.03 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 30% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against TyLoo, Oct 03
- Win against Aurora, Oct 04
- Loss against Vitality, Oct 05
- Win against Na'Vi, Oct 06
- Loss against Spirit, Oct 09
- Loss against MOUZ, Oct 03
- Loss against BetBoom, Oct 04
- Win against TyLoo, Oct 05
- Win against Legacy, Oct 06
- Loss against Spirit, Oct 07
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Loses: 2
Team Spirit
Loses: 1
-
Wins: 1
Loses: 1
Legacy
Wins: 1
-
Wins: 1
Natus Vincere
Wins: 1
-
Wins: 1
Aurora Gaming
Loses: 1
-
Wins: 1
TyLoo
Wins: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other CSAC matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
[A] Team Falcons vs. M80 - CS Asia Championships 2026 - Group Stage: Winners' Match
-
[B] Legacy vs. TYLOO - CS Asia Championships 2026 - Group Stage: Winners' Match
-
[UA] Falcons vs M80 | CS Asia Championships 2026
-
[FIL] CS Asia 2026 - Liquid vs PV, MongolZ vs Lynn, MOUZ vs TYLOO, FLC vs BCG, PV vs MIBR,FLC vs M80
-
🔴Falcon vs M80 | CS Asia Championships 2026 | Bình Luận CS2 Tiếng Việt
-
WINNER TO PLAYOFFS! Falcons vs M80 - HIGHLIGHTS - CS Asia Championships 2026 | CS2
-
ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ В ПЛЕЙ-ОФФ! Falcons vs M80 - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - CS Asia Championships 2026 l КС2
-
WINNER TO PLAYOFFS! Legacy vs TYLOO - HIGHLIGHTS - CS Asia Championships 2026 | CS2
-
Falcons vs M80 - CS Asia Championships 2026 - Group A
-
Legacy vs TYLOO - CS Asia Championships 2026 - Group A
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 4 months ago
- Tournament
- 2026 CS Asia Championships
- Stage
- Group A
- Format
- bo3