- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 2h 55m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Ancient 6:13 Heroic
- Inferno 13:1 EF
- Mirage 13:9 EF
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
EF
Nuke
ban
-
Heroic
Anubis
ban
-
EF
Ancient
pick
-
Heroic
Inferno
pick
-
EF
Dust2
ban
-
Heroic
Cache
ban
- — Mirage decider
-
Ancient
Pick: EF
41 minutes
6:13
Heroic won
1st half 5–7
2nd half 1–6
-
Inferno
Pick: Heroic
35 minutes
13:1
EF won
1st half 11–1
2nd half 2–0
-
Mirage
Decider
55 minutes
13:9
EF won
1st half 10–2
2nd half 3–7
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale3 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 47 | 36 | 10 | +11 | 40% | 74 | 67% | 6.95 | 6-3 | 8-11 | |
|
|
3 | 42 | 30 | 13 | +12 | 48% | 88 | 84% | 6.81 | 6-3 | 9-3 | |
|
|
3 | 40 | 36 | 21 | +4 | 63% | 96 | 75% | 6.40 | 6-9 | 11-5 | |
|
|
3 | 38 | 38 | 6 | +0 | 58% | 69 | 75% | 6.06 | 6-7 | 5-13 | |
|
|
3 | 31 | 40 | 11 | -9 | 68% | 62 | 73% | 5.41 | 3-6 | 5-11 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3 | 37 | 37 | 8 | +0 | 59% | 69 | 69% | 6.08 | 4-4 | 5-6 | |
|
|
3 | 37 | 34 | 15 | +3 | 57% | 74 | 82% | 6.02 | 4-7 | 12-7 | |
|
|
3 | 33 | 43 | 17 | -10 | 58% | 83 | 75% | 5.97 | 8-7 | 6-9 | |
|
|
3 | 35 | 45 | 11 | -10 | 57% | 64 | 75% | 5.90 | 6-3 | 7-17 | |
|
|
3 | 36 | 41 | 11 | -5 | 67% | 73 | 71% | 5.88 | 6-6 | 11-10 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
11 | 13 | 4 | -2 | 45% | 76 | 68% | 5.77 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 16% | |
|
|
9 | 14 | 0 | -5 | 78% | 54 | 63% | 4.78 | 0-4 | 1-3 | 17% | |
|
|
9 | 15 | 0 | -6 | 78% | 51 | 58% | 4.76 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 21% | |
|
|
8 | 15 | 3 | -7 | 50% | 42 | 47% | 4.71 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 27% | |
|
|
8 | 15 | 3 | -7 | 75% | 65 | 53% | 4.41 | 1-7 | 1-2 | 10% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
16 | 10 | 2 | +6 | 88% | 88 | 84% | 7.24 | 5-1 | 3-4 | 16% | |
|
|
15 | 10 | 6 | +5 | 53% | 100 | 79% | 7.15 | 4-2 | 2-3 | 20% | |
|
|
14 | 7 | 5 | +7 | 50% | 83 | 95% | 7.11 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 14% | |
|
|
15 | 7 | 3 | +8 | 67% | 74 | 84% | 6.78 | 2-0 | 4-2 | 18% | |
|
|
12 | 12 | 4 | +0 | 67% | 65 | 79% | 6.19 | 3-0 | 2-6 | 17% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19 | 5 | 3 | +14 | 37% | 135 | 93% | 9.67 | 3-0 | 3-1 | 19% | |
|
|
18 | 7 | 3 | +11 | 33% | 97 | 86% | 8.97 | 4-0 | 4-3 | 35% | |
|
|
12 | 8 | 13 | +4 | 75% | 129 | 93% | 7.07 | 0-1 | 3-2 | 13% | |
|
|
14 | 10 | 3 | +4 | 50% | 84 | 86% | 7.03 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 20% | |
|
|
7 | 7 | 7 | +0 | 71% | 55 | 100% | 5.38 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 13% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
9 | 14 | 1 | -5 | 89% | 71 | 57% | 5.93 | 2-1 | 1-3 | 13% | |
|
|
9 | 14 | 1 | -5 | 44% | 61 | 57% | 4.95 | 0-3 | 4-2 | 22% | |
|
|
7 | 14 | 2 | -7 | 57% | 60 | 71% | 4.89 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 20% | |
|
|
6 | 14 | 3 | -8 | 100% | 59 | 57% | 4.67 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 9% | |
|
|
5 | 14 | 5 | -9 | 40% | 60 | 71% | 4.65 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 22% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20 | 13 | 5 | +7 | 50% | 102 | 82% | 7.69 | 5-1 | 7-1 | 21% | |
|
|
21 | 14 | 4 | +7 | 43% | 86 | 73% | 7.59 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 20% | |
|
|
15 | 14 | 3 | +1 | 53% | 72 | 77% | 6.55 | 3-1 | 3-6 | 19% | |
|
|
15 | 18 | 4 | -3 | 60% | 75 | 68% | 5.99 | 3-4 | 2-7 | 25% | |
|
|
12 | 12 | 6 | +0 | 67% | 69 | 91% | 5.90 | 2-1 | 4-1 | 14% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17 | 19 | 4 | -2 | 35% | 65 | 82% | 6.42 | 3-1 | 4-7 | 23% | |
|
|
15 | 13 | 10 | +2 | 47% | 83 | 86% | 6.09 | 0-4 | 5-3 | 19% | |
|
|
13 | 19 | 6 | -6 | 69% | 84 | 73% | 5.80 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 21% | |
|
|
11 | 17 | 8 | -6 | 55% | 67 | 68% | 5.29 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 27% | |
|
|
14 | 16 | 2 | -2 | 50% | 56 | 55% | 5.28 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 26% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against ANTK, Oct 02
- Win against BSM, Oct 02
- Win against Sangal, Oct 03
- Win against JJH, Oct 03
- Loss against NiP, Oct 03
- Win against JS, Sep 22
- Win against BBL, Sep 22
- Win against FNC, Sep 25
- Win against Sangal, Sep 26
- Win against 100T, Sep 26
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Wins: 1
Loses: 1
100 Thieves
Wins: 1
-
Wins: 2
K27
Wins: 1
-
Wins: 1
Loses: 1
Nuclear TigeRES
Wins: 1
-
Wins: 1
Sangal Esports
Wins: 1
-
Loses: 1
HOTU
Wins: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other IEM matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
CINEMA! Eternal Fire vs HEROIC - CLOSED QUALIFIER! | IEM Beijing 2026 CS2 Highlights
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 1 month ago
- Tournament
- 2026 Intel Extreme Masters China
- Stage
- Closed Qualifier
- Format
- bo3