Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 52m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Zero Tenacity
2:1
One Move
  • Game 1 28–10 kills Z10
  • Game 2 6–34 kills MOVE
  • Game 3 33–43 kills Z10
1473 +14 ENSI.Score before the match 1422 −14
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Last meeting · May 17, 2025 · Zero Tenacity 2:0

Maps

  1. Game 1 27 minutes 28–10 kills Z10 won
  2. Game 2 29 minutes 6–34 kills MOVE won
  3. Game 3 50 minutes 33–43 kills Z10 won

Player statistics

3 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
RetsuRussia 3 15 16 28 -1 20,921 52,532 564 620 / 782
StojkovMacedonia Igor Stojkov 3 25 10 24 +15 17,728 68,385 407 547 / 688
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 3 13 19 33 -6 17,651 43,123 516 521 / 676
PabloSweden Axel Källman 3 8 23 30 -15 10,746 28,264 143 334 / 418
LeBronDotaSerbia Nikola Popovic 3 5 21 41 -16 10,238 37,218 226 363 / 482
One Move
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
GilgirRussia Georgiy Svistunov 3 23 9 32 +14 22,139 67,601 687 695 / 782
DifferenceRussia Vladimir Klimontov 3 28 11 26 +17 18,509 70,330 459 552 / 706
CodeXSerbia Danilo Popović 3 19 16 22 +3 17,699 52,996 552 551 / 689
bb3pxRussia Evdokimychev Nikolay 3 14 13 46 +1 8,664 45,771 96 308 / 455
Sun<3 3 3 19 47 -16 8,358 35,183 67 263 / 421

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Zero Tenacity

One Move

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Zero Tenacity Now One Move
  1. Loss against PIPS4, Sep 04
  2. Win against DYN, Sep 06
  3. Loss against Na'Vi, Sep 12
  4. Loss against 2M, Sep 21
  5. Loss against Lynx, Sep 22
 Formlast 5
  1. Win against eSpoiled, Jul 24
  2. Loss against WG, Jul 24
  3. Loss against TNL, Jul 25
  4. Loss against AVULUS, Jul 25
  5. Loss against eSpoiled, Jul 26
3 losses Streak 4 losses
40% Winrate 10 30%
53% Winrate 30 37%
−13 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −7 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Zero Tenacity One Move

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Zero Tenacity One Move
3 Wins3 meetings 0
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S25 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 One Move 0 Game 1 — 31–37 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 36–11 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 One Move 1 Game 1 — 28–10 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 6–34 kills — Winner: One Move; Game 3 — 33–43 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S21 Playoffs Ended One Move 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–31 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 24–46 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
All Z10 and MOVE Encounters (3)

Teams Recent Performance

Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Team Lynx, Winner 2 Game 1 — 44–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 27–43 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 3 — 23–37 kills — Winner: Team Lynx
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Two Move, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 41–20 kills — Winner: Two Move; Game 2 — 42–39 kills — Winner: Two Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 BS Closed Qualifier Ended Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 37–22 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 39–10 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–27 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 12–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–46 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 24–34 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
All Zero Tenacity Encounters
One Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Group Stage Ended One Move 0 eSpoiled, Winner 2 Game 1 — 41–35 kills — Winner: eSpoiled; Game 2 — 5–20 kills — Winner: eSpoiled
Dota 2 T2 bo2 FU Play-In Ended One Move 0 AVULUS, Winner 2 Game 1 — 21–51 kills — Winner: AVULUS; Game 2 — 14–35 kills — Winner: AVULUS
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Group Stage Walkover TEAM NEXT LEVEL, Winner One Move —
Dota 2 T2 bo2 FU Play-In Ended One Move 0 Wildcard Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 17–32 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 2 — 20–42 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Group Stage Ended eSpoiled 1 One Move, Winner 2 Game 1 — 24–17 kills — Winner: eSpoiled; Game 2 — 11–29 kills — Winner: One Move; Game 3 — 11–12 kills — Winner: One Move
All One Move Encounters
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
1 year ago
Tournament
2025 CCT Series 8
Stage
Group A
Format
bo3

Login