Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T3
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 14m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Zero Tenacity
2:0
One Move
  • Game 1 31–37 kills Z10
  • Game 2 36–11 kills Z10
1498 +13 ENSI.Score before the match 1439 −13
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 52 minutes 31–37 kills Z10 won
  2. Game 2 34 minutes 36–11 kills Z10 won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
NandeGeorgia 2 17 13 24 +4 31,361 59,589 516 837 / 835
StojkovMacedonia Igor Stojkov 2 30 7 26 +23 25,208 99,826 327 629 / 767
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 2 8 5 37 +3 24,010 50,870 350 567 / 706
PabloSweden Axel Källman 2 4 11 50 -7 14,020 28,652 147 365 / 528
LeBronDotaSerbia Nikola Popovic 2 5 12 42 -7 10,138 24,867 43 313 / 512
One Move
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
eyesxght 2 9 2 13 +7 29,084 44,003 606 707 / 851
загублена лолiRussia Dmitrii Bulatov 2 15 14 17 +1 20,946 43,751 466 547 / 660
DifferenceRussia Vladimir Klimontov 2 9 12 15 -3 19,826 33,219 437 527 / 693
not meRussia Alexey Kosmynin 2 9 20 23 -11 11,819 38,763 191 318 / 431
bb3pxRussia Evdokimychev Nikolay 2 6 19 17 -13 8,299 19,854 84 260 / 372

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Zero Tenacity

One Move

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Zero Tenacity Now One Move
  1. Loss against PIPS4, Sep 04
  2. Win against DYN, Sep 06
  3. Loss against Na'Vi, Sep 12
  4. Loss against 2M, Sep 21
  5. Loss against Lynx, Sep 22
 Formlast 5
  1. Win against eSpoiled, Jul 24
  2. Loss against WG, Jul 24
  3. Loss against TNL, Jul 25
  4. Loss against AVULUS, Jul 25
  5. Loss against eSpoiled, Jul 26
3 losses Streak 4 losses
40% Winrate 10 30%
53% Winrate 30 37%
−13 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −7 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Zero Tenacity One Move

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Zero Tenacity One Move
3 Wins3 meetings 0
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S25 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 One Move 0 Game 1 — 31–37 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 36–11 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT S8 Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 One Move 1 Game 1 — 28–10 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 6–34 kills — Winner: One Move; Game 3 — 33–43 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S21 Playoffs Ended One Move 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–31 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 24–46 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
All Z10 and MOVE Encounters (3)

Teams Recent Performance

Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Team Lynx, Winner 2 Game 1 — 44–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 27–43 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 3 — 23–37 kills — Winner: Team Lynx
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Two Move, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 41–20 kills — Winner: Two Move; Game 2 — 42–39 kills — Winner: Two Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 BS Closed Qualifier Ended Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 37–22 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 39–10 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–27 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 12–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–46 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 24–34 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
All Zero Tenacity Encounters
One Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Group Stage Ended One Move 0 eSpoiled, Winner 2 Game 1 — 41–35 kills — Winner: eSpoiled; Game 2 — 5–20 kills — Winner: eSpoiled
Dota 2 T2 bo2 FU Play-In Ended One Move 0 AVULUS, Winner 2 Game 1 — 21–51 kills — Winner: AVULUS; Game 2 — 14–35 kills — Winner: AVULUS
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Group Stage Walkover TEAM NEXT LEVEL, Winner One Move —
Dota 2 T2 bo2 FU Play-In Ended One Move 0 Wildcard Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 17–32 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 2 — 20–42 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
Dota 2 T3 bo3 CCT Group Stage Ended eSpoiled 1 One Move, Winner 2 Game 1 — 24–17 kills — Winner: eSpoiled; Game 2 — 11–29 kills — Winner: One Move; Game 3 — 11–12 kills — Winner: One Move
All One Move Encounters

Match VOD

Found on YouTube by the name of this match

  • Zero Tenacity vs One Move bo3 Playoffs European Pro League Season 26

    Zero Tenacity vs One Move bo3 Playoffs European Pro League Season 26

    Crazy Fellow 1.7K views

Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
1 year ago
Tournament
2025 European Pro League Season 26
Stage
Bracket
Format
bo3

Login