Zero Tenacity vs F9 Team 2:0 Dota 2 - Result and Map Stats - Ensigame

Skip to content

T2
Dota 2
bo3
Ended May 31, 15:34
Duration 1h 29m
Times in GMT+00:00

Zero Tenacity

2:0

Game 1 31–10 kills Z10
Game 2 25–14 kills Z10

1507 +12 ENSI.Score before the match 1416 −12

— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

Game 1 24 minutes 31–10 kills Z10 won
Game 2 24 minutes 25–14 kills Z10 won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Zero Tenacity
Player	M	K	D	A	+/-	NW	HD	CS	GPM/XPM	More numbers
Kami Kyalbek Tayirov	2	22	3	15	+19	15,526	38,461	327	653 / 789
Worick Vitaly Brezgin	2	13	3	20	+10	12,512	27,860	234	534 / 635
MIkSa' Mykhailo Jovanovich	2	5	3	11	+2	12,227	11,557	269	506 / 606
MoOz Joel Mori Ozambela	2	5	9	36	-4	7,111	13,345	42	298 / 458
dEsire Sakis Kartsampas	2	10	6	20	+4	6,991	19,443	77	340 / 478

F9 Team
Player	M	K	D	A	+/-	NW	HD	CS	GPM/XPM	More numbers
bondage-	2	5	8	9	-3	10,777	13,891	236	462 / 491
GRUZIA_1990	2	3	12	8	-9	8,760	16,660	167	375 / 434
Replicate	2	2	13	7	-11	8,552	18,500	218	380 / 412
elmo	2	7	10	12	-3	4,919	19,571	39	257 / 266
pj	2	6	13	13	-7	4,241	14,895	50	249 / 294

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Structures

Z10 17/17 F9 11/17

Picks and Bans

Zero Tenacity

F9 Team

Player Stats and Builds

Zero Tenacity Radiant
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
16 Worick Vitaly Brezgin	10	2	10	+8	5	13,260	14,411	132 / 13 / 42	564 / 636
19 Kami Kyalbek Tayirov	8	0	9	+8	∞	16,800	18,591	199 / 32 / 77	693 / 846
15 dEsire Sakis Kartsampas	5	4	12	+1	1.25	7,371	11,607	42 / 1 / 0	360 / 516
16 MIkSa' Mykhailo Jovanovich	4	0	9	+4	∞	12,842	9,436	146 / 10 / 41	537 / 625
14 MoOz Joel Mori Ozambela	3	4	18	-1	0.75	6,684	6,209	19 / 2 / 1	310 / 505

F9 Team Dire
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
10 elmo	3	7	5	-4	0.43	5,557	8,765	26 / 0 / 44	270 / 270
10 pj	2	7	6	-5	0.29	4,423	7,515	31 / 2 / 24	244 / 244
14 bondage-	2	5	4	-3	0.4	9,849	4,464	96 / 6 / 97	425 / 456
13 Replicate	1	8	3	-7	0.13	7,457	9,969	87 / 5 / 21	329 / 397
14 GRUZIA_1990	1	4	3	-3	0.25	9,481	3,710	98 / 0 / 59	394 / 454

K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · K/D — Kills/Deaths Ratio · Damage — Hero Damage · Creep Stats — Creep Kills / Denies / Neutral · GPM / XPM — Gold Per Minute / Experience Per Minute

Structures

Z10 15/17 F9 14/17

Picks and Bans

Zero Tenacity

F9 Team

Player Stats and Builds

Zero Tenacity Dire
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
17 Kami Kyalbek Tayirov	14	3	6	+11	4.67	14,251	19,870	128 / 21 / 58	612 / 732
13 dEsire Sakis Kartsampas	5	2	8	+3	2.5	6,610	7,836	35 / 0 / 10	319 / 440
16 Worick Vitaly Brezgin	3	1	10	+2	3	11,763	13,449	102 / 4 / 81	504 / 634
13 MoOz Joel Mori Ozambela	2	5	18	-3	0.4	7,537	7,136	23 / 0 / 3	286 / 411
15 MIkSa' Mykhailo Jovanovich	1	3	2	-2	0.33	11,611	2,121	123 / 9 / 78	474 / 586

F9 Team Radiant
Player	K	D	A	+/-	K/D	Net Worth	Damage	Creep Stats	GPM / XPM	Build	More numbers
12 pj	4	6	7	-2	0.67	4,059	7,380	19 / 4 / 2	254 / 343
10 elmo	4	3	7	+1	1.33	4,281	10,806	13 / 1 / 7	244 / 261
15 bondage-	3	3	5	+0	1	11,705	9,427	140 / 10 / 42	498 / 525
13 GRUZIA_1990	2	8	5	-6	0.25	8,038	12,950	69 / 3 / 34	356 / 414
13 Replicate	1	5	4	-4	0.2	9,647	8,531	131 / 11 / 26	430 / 427

K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · K/D — Kills/Deaths Ratio · Damage — Hero Damage · Creep Stats — Creep Kills / Denies / Neutral · GPM / XPM — Gold Per Minute / Experience Per Minute

Lineups

Zero Tenacity

F9 Team

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Zero Tenacity Now

Loss against Lynx, Oct 13
Loss against MW, Oct 14
Win against PuckChamp, Oct 15
Loss against CH, Oct 16
Win against ICI, Oct 17

Formlast 5

Win against unk, May 30
Loss against Z10, May 31
Loss against Flame, Jun 01

1 win Streak 2 losses

20% Winrate 10 33%

43% Winrate 30 33%

−23 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp 0 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

1 Wins1 meeting 0

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Western Europe May 31 Ended

Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 F9 Team 0 Game 1 — 31–10 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 25–14 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity

Teams Recent Performance

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Oct 17 Ended

Zero Tenacity, Winner 2

IC x Insanity 1 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —; Game 3 — —

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Oct 16 Ended CyberHero, Winner 2

Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 44–29 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 28–32 kills — Winner: CyberHero

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Oct 15 Ended

Zero Tenacity, Winner 2

PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 30–6 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 36–17 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Oct 14 Ended

Zero Tenacity 1 Mena Warriors, Winner 2 Game 1 — 48–34 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 18–47 kills — Winner: Mena Warriors; Game 3 — 16–35 kills — Winner: Mena Warriors

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Oct 13 Ended

Team Lynx, Winner 2

Zero Tenacity 1 Game 1 — 42–17 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 2 — 18–41 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 49–43 kills — Winner: Team Lynx

All Zero Tenacity Encounters

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Western Europe Jun 01 Ended F9 Team 0

Flame, Winner 2 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Western Europe May 31 Ended

Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 F9 Team 0 Game 1 — 31–10 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 25–14 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity

Dota 2 T3 bo3 EWC Western Europe May 30 Ended unknow 0 F9 Team, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–32 kills — Winner: F9 Team; Game 2 — 25–51 kills — Winner: F9 Team

All F9 Team Encounters

Other EWC matches

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Western Europe May 31 Ended

LGD Gaming, Winner 2 Balu Team 0 Game 1 — 35–4 kills — Winner: LGD Gaming; Game 2 — 47–9 kills — Winner: LGD Gaming

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Western Europe May 31 Ended

Team Lynx 0 Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Game 1 — 9–25 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 28–45 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Western Europe May 31 Ended

Zero Tenacity 0

Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Game 1 — 8–26 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 14–25 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Western Europe May 31 Ended

LGD Gaming, Winner 2 Pipsqueak+4 0 Game 1 — — — Winner: LGD Gaming; Game 2 — 54–46 kills — Winner: LGD Gaming

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Eastern Europe Jun 01 Ended Enjoy 0 Two Move, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–47 kills — Winner: Two Move; Game 2 — 31–36 kills — Winner: Two Move

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EWC Western Europe Jun 01 Ended Balu Team 0

Team Lynx, Winner 2 Game 1 — 9–37 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 2 — 23–49 kills — Winner: Team Lynx

All EWC matches

Match VOD

Found on YouTube by the name of this match

ХАЙЛАЙТИ МАТЧУ | NAVI vs Flame Team | EWC 2026 WE CQ Dota 2

Dota 2 Maincast 492 views
ZERO TENACITY vs F9 TEAM | Bo3 | EWC 2026 Closed Qualifier: Western Europe #dota2live

Summit Pro 71 views

Advertisement

About the match

Played on: May 31 14:05 GMT+00:00; 4 months ago
Tournament: 2026 Esports World Cup
Stage: Closed Qualifier
Format: bo3