Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 17m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
PuckChamp
0:2
Zero Tenacity
  • Game 1 12–38 kills Z10
  • Game 2 30–28 kills Z10
1476 −15 ENSI.Score before the match 1491 +15
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Last meeting · Aug 31, 2026 · Zero Tenacity 2:0

Maps

  1. Game 1 38 minutes 12–38 kills Z10 won
  2. Game 2 40 minutes 30–28 kills Z10 won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

PuckChamp
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
кроляUkraine Olexander Oliinyk 2 7 5 15 +2 22,984 33,532 466 600 / 616
YuragiUkraine Artem Golubiev 2 16 11 8 +5 22,944 39,889 386 644 / 789
xn'eEstonia Smirnov Veniamin 2 10 16 16 -6 18,556 44,122 374 576 / 744
HyugaUkraine Denys Deineko 2 3 17 21 -14 10,418 23,131 130 314 / 350
hard work pillUkraine Tymur Tarasiuk 2 6 18 16 -12 9,299 47,569 73 310 / 359
Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
NesfeerRussia Kurbanov Magomed 2 13 5 18 +8 31,830 47,861 562 864 / 1,030
MIkSa'Serbia Mykhailo Jovanovich 2 13 8 24 +5 23,210 32,688 305 623 / 825
WorickRussia Vitaly Brezgin 2 23 10 23 +13 21,612 55,472 369 614 / 773
mrlsRussia Artem Selepko 2 11 8 36 +3 14,270 54,639 159 445 / 616
MoOzPeru Joel Mori Ozambela 2 4 11 37 -7 10,999 19,353 59 351 / 573

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

PuckChamp

Did not play this match

Zero Tenacity

Did not play this match

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

PuckChamp Now Zero Tenacity
  1. Loss against Z10, Aug 31
  2. Loss against KS, Sep 01
  3. Loss against DYN, Sep 02
  4. Loss against Spirit Acad., Sep 03
  5. Loss against PIPS4, Sep 05
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against PIPS4, Sep 04
  2. Win against DYN, Sep 06
  3. Loss against Na'Vi, Sep 12
  4. Loss against 2M, Sep 21
  5. Loss against Lynx, Sep 22
8 losses Streak 3 losses
20% Winrate 10 40%
40% Winrate 30 53%
−20 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −13 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

PuckChamp Zero Tenacity
2 Advantage4 common opponents 4

Previous Encounters

PuckChamp Zero Tenacity
0 Wins2 meetings 2
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–34 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 14–20 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 12–38 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 30–28 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity

Teams Recent Performance

PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 22–16 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 26–9 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Team Spirit Academy, Winner 2 Game 1 — 12–34 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy; Game 2 — 34–47 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 31–15 kills — Winner: DYNASTY; Game 2 — 34–11 kills — Winner: DYNASTY
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Klim Sani4, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 48–13 kills — Winner: Klim Sani4; Game 2 — 44–28 kills — Winner: Klim Sani4
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–34 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 14–20 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
All PuckChamp Encounters
Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Team Lynx, Winner 2 Game 1 — 44–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 27–43 kills — Winner: Team Lynx; Game 3 — 23–37 kills — Winner: Team Lynx
Dota 2 T3 bo3 EPL S40 Playoffs Ended Two Move, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 41–20 kills — Winner: Two Move; Game 2 — 42–39 kills — Winner: Two Move
Dota 2 T3 bo3 BS Closed Qualifier Ended Natus Vincere, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 37–22 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere; Game 2 — 39–10 kills — Winner: Natus Vincere
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 14–27 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 12–26 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Zero Tenacity 0 Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–46 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 24–34 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
All Zero Tenacity Encounters

Other EPL M matches

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended No Hoodwink, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 24–19 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink; Game 2 — 37–35 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended PuckChamp, Winner 2 KW 0 Game 1 — 36–18 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 2 — 35–14 kills — Winner: PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended RE Arise 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 30–50 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 41–41 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Amaru Gaming 1 Nemiga Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–41 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 2 — 50–36 kills — Winner: Amaru Gaming; Game 3 — 22–55 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Level UP, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 1 Game 1 — 40–19 kills — Winner: Level UP; Game 2 — 17–25 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 46–36 kills — Winner: Level UP
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Amaru Gaming 0 Power Rangers, Winner 2 Game 1 — 16–36 kills — Winner: Power Rangers; Game 2 — 12–33 kills — Winner: Power Rangers
All EPL M matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
2 months ago
Tournament
2026 EPL Masters I
Stage
Group B
Format
bo3

Login