Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 3m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Zero Tenacity
2:0
PuckChamp
  • Game 1 30–6 kills Z10
  • Game 2 36–17 kills Z10
1400 +13 ENSI.Score, locked for the prediction 1327 −13
60% Win probability 40%

Locked before the match

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 33 minutes 30–6 kills Z10 won
  2. Game 2 34 minutes 36–17 kills Z10 won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
NesfeerRussia Kurbanov Magomed 2 14 2 18 +12 23,382 47,761 363 715 / 879
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 2 7 1 29 +6 23,245 32,234 456 712 / 810
arcane fantasyRussia Daniil Ivanov 2 31 3 25 +28 21,734 65,325 402 675 / 941
rare godsInternational 2 10 7 33 +3 10,772 23,271 36 361 / 436
HduoUkraine Ilya Deriglazov 2 4 10 35 -6 9,639 27,588 35 334 / 395
PuckChamp
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
OnlitalUkraine Oleksii Lytovka 2 3 10 10 -7 18,690 36,293 305 597 / 632
кроляUkraine Olexander Oliinyk 2 5 11 9 -6 14,204 21,173 266 457 / 501
dreamcoreUkraine Artem Diachuk 2 10 13 5 -3 13,874 30,745 295 451 / 531
hard work pillUkraine Tymur Tarasiuk 2 4 12 10 -8 7,100 24,539 97 265 / 370
Akamu 2 1 20 15 -19 6,032 17,137 17 239 / 327

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

Zero Tenacity

PuckChamp

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Zero Tenacity Now PuckChamp
  1. Loss against YeS, Oct 19
  2. Win against Bulls, Oct 21
  3. Win against TB, Oct 22
  4. Loss against Synapse, Oct 24
  5. Loss against CH, Oct 25
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against LEGION, Oct 15
  2. Loss against Z10, Oct 15
  3. Win against MW, Oct 15
  4. Loss against Bulls, Oct 16
  5. Loss against ICI, Oct 17
2 losses Streak 2 losses
40% Winrate 10 20%
40% Winrate 30 23%
0 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −3 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Zero Tenacity PuckChamp
4 Advantage5 common opponents 3

Previous Encounters

Zero Tenacity PuckChamp
3 Wins3 meetings 0
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 30–6 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 36–17 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–34 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 14–20 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 12–38 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 30–28 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
All Z10 and PuckChamp Encounters (3)

Teams Recent Performance

Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 34–15 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 43–35 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Team Synapse, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 1 Game 1 — 49–30 kills — Winner: Team Synapse; Game 2 — 35–36 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 51–28 kills — Winner: Team Synapse
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended TheBot$ 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–38 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 22–42 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Dawn Bulls 1 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 33–12 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls; Game 2 — 12–31 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 6–29 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Yellow Submarine, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 24–4 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine; Game 2 — 31–32 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine
All Zero Tenacity Encounters
PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended PuckChamp 1 IC x Insanity, Winner 2 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — —; Game 3 — —
Dota 2 T2 bo3 DL S30 Western Europe Ended Dawn Bulls, Winner 2 PuckChamp 1 Game 1 — 23–9 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls; Game 2 — 29–31 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 3 — 32–7 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended PuckChamp, Winner 2 Mena Warriors 0 Game 1 — 30–30 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 2 — 34–29 kills — Winner: PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 30–6 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 36–17 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 DL S30 Western Europe Ended LEGION, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 26–5 kills — Winner: LEGION; Game 2 — 30–11 kills — Winner: LEGION
All PuckChamp Encounters

Other EPL matches

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Dawn Bulls, Winner 2 salamit 1 Game 1 — 17–28 kills — Winner: salamit; Game 2 — 28–13 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls; Game 3 — 28–10 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Zero Tenacity 1 Mena Warriors, Winner 2 Game 1 — 48–34 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 18–47 kills — Winner: Mena Warriors; Game 3 — 16–35 kills — Winner: Mena Warriors
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Team Spirit Academy, Winner 2 salamit 0 Game 1 — 37–26 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy; Game 2 — —
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended PuckChamp, Winner 2 Mena Warriors 0 Game 1 — 30–30 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 2 — 34–29 kills — Winner: PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 44–29 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 28–32 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Mena Warriors 0 CyberHero, Winner 2 Game 1 — 47–42 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 28–42 kills — Winner: CyberHero
All EPL matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
2 weeks ago
Tournament
2026 EPL Masters III
Stage
Group A
Format
bo3

Login