Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 25m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
No Hoodwink
2:0
PuckChamp
  • Game 1 24–19 kills NH
  • Game 2 37–35 kills NH
1400 +20 ENSI.Score before the match 1484 −20
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 38 minutes 24–19 kills NH won
  2. Game 2 64 minutes 37–35 kills NH won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

No Hoodwink
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
LycorisMoldova Vladislav Gaidau 2 17 3 22 +14 41,009 83,842 607 790 / 848
re1blRussia Maxim Afanasyev 2 12 10 37 +2 29,659 94,568 573 675 / 912
infernalUkraine Rodion Kulakov 2 6 7 34 -1 28,640 36,001 412 607 / 747
ancleveRussia 2 14 17 19 -3 16,233 31,647 78 369 / 583
asdekor_rRussia Vyacheslav Ignatev 2 12 17 29 -5 15,156 27,566 85 395 / 547
PuckChamp
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
YuragiUkraine Artem Golubiev 2 10 7 23 +3 35,511 100,950 798 836 / 926
xn'eEstonia Smirnov Veniamin 2 19 6 25 +13 29,804 86,784 632 643 / 863
кроляUkraine Olexander Oliinyk 2 10 9 20 +1 25,030 48,024 640 580 / 803
HyugaUkraine Denys Deineko 2 4 17 20 -13 11,966 30,447 104 298 / 358
hard work pillUkraine Tymur Tarasiuk 2 10 22 27 -12 11,017 41,928 91 321 / 403

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

No Hoodwink

Did not play this match

PuckChamp

Did not play this match

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

No Hoodwink Now PuckChamp
  1. Win against ILBE, Aug 08
  2. Loss against Spirit Acad., Aug 08
  3. Win against FTS, Aug 09
  4. Win against RE.A, Aug 10
  5. Loss against Spirit Acad., Aug 11
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against Z10, Aug 31
  2. Loss against KS, Sep 01
  3. Loss against DYN, Sep 02
  4. Loss against Spirit Acad., Sep 03
  5. Loss against PIPS4, Sep 05
1 loss Streak 8 losses
44% Winrate 10 20%
44% Winrate 30 40%
0 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp −20 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

No Hoodwink PuckChamp
3 Advantage3 common opponents 3

Previous Encounters

No Hoodwink PuckChamp
1 Wins1 meeting 0
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended No Hoodwink, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 24–19 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink; Game 2 — 37–35 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink

Teams Recent Performance

No Hoodwink
Dota 2 T3 bo3 ACS1 Playoffs Ended Team Spirit Academy, Winner 2 No Hoodwink 0 Game 1 — 29–26 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy; Game 2 — 41–18 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy
Dota 2 T3 bo3 ACS1 Playoffs Ended RE Arise 0 No Hoodwink, Winner 2 Game 1 — 10–38 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink; Game 2 — 34–31 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink
Dota 2 T3 bo3 ACS1 Playoffs Ended No Hoodwink, Winner 2 FTS 0 Game 1 — 35–11 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink; Game 2 — 43–29 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink
Dota 2 T3 bo3 ACS1 Playoffs Ended Team Spirit Academy, Winner 2 No Hoodwink 0 Game 1 — 39–19 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy; Game 2 — 41–34 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy
Dota 2 T3 bo3 ACS1 Playoffs Ended Ilbirs eSports 1 No Hoodwink, Winner 2 Game 1 — 35–15 kills — Winner: Ilbirs eSports; Game 2 — 9–25 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink; Game 3 — 8–18 kills — Winner: No Hoodwink
All No Hoodwink Encounters
PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Pipsqueak+4, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 22–16 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4; Game 2 — 26–9 kills — Winner: Pipsqueak+4
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Team Spirit Academy, Winner 2 Game 1 — 12–34 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy; Game 2 — 34–47 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended DYNASTY, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 31–15 kills — Winner: DYNASTY; Game 2 — 34–11 kills — Winner: DYNASTY
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Klim Sani4, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 48–13 kills — Winner: Klim Sani4; Game 2 — 44–28 kills — Winner: Klim Sani4
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended PuckChamp 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 19–34 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 14–20 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
All PuckChamp Encounters

Other EPL M matches

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Level UP, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 30–5 kills — Winner: Level UP; Game 2 — 40–31 kills — Winner: Level UP
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Team Syntax, Winner 2 Nemiga Gaming 1 Game 1 — 32–41 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 2 — 36–20 kills — Winner: Team Syntax; Game 3 — 39–35 kills — Winner: Team Syntax
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended Power Rangers, Winner 2 Nemiga Gaming 1 Game 1 — 26–16 kills — Winner: Power Rangers; Game 2 — 19–35 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 3 — 28–7 kills — Winner: Power Rangers
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended PuckChamp, Winner 2 KW 0 Game 1 — 36–18 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 2 — 35–14 kills — Winner: PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Walkover Level UP, Winner KW —
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL M Group Stage Ended RE Arise 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 30–50 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 41–41 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
All EPL M matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
2 months ago
Tournament
2026 EPL Masters I
Stage
Group B
Format
bo3

Login