Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 5m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
CyberHero
2:0
Zero Tenacity
  • Game 1 34–15 kills CH
  • Game 2 43–35 kills CH
1440 +15 ENSI.Score, locked for the prediction 1427 −15
52% Win probability 48%

Locked before the match

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Next meeting · Nov 11, 2026

Maps

  1. Game 1 30 minutes 34–15 kills CH won
  2. Game 2 65 minutes 43–35 kills CH won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

CyberHero
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
WoERussia Ruban Nikolay Olegovich 2 20 7 27 +13 26,839 64,223 391 741 / 885
AinkradBelarus Aleksei Diveevskiy 2 19 9 36 +10 23,167 74,688 363 630 / 1,029
bb3pxRussia Evdokimychev Nikolay 2 17 10 26 +7 22,071 56,297 442 594 / 732
semataryRussia Maksim Kravchenkov 2 14 10 35 +4 14,925 45,917 115 402 / 660
HtrdRussia Andrey Fedorov 2 7 14 41 -7 11,402 34,374 44 352 / 573
Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
NesfeerRussia Kurbanov Magomed 2 12 8 13 +4 22,495 41,615 451 635 / 784
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 2 8 14 22 -6 18,305 44,790 356 524 / 686
arcane fantasyRussia Daniil Ivanov 2 9 17 29 -8 18,090 56,611 366 491 / 627
rare godsInternational 2 13 20 22 -7 11,356 35,005 155 344 / 413
HduoUkraine Ilya Deriglazov 2 8 18 27 -10 7,838 30,551 34 275 / 354

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

CyberHero

Zero Tenacity

Did not play this match

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

CyberHero Now Zero Tenacity
  1. Win against TB, Oct 24
  2. Win against Z10, Oct 25
  3. Loss against GL, Nov 02
  4. Win against Nemiga, Nov 03
  5. Loss against HULIGANI, Nov 04
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against YeS, Oct 19
  2. Win against Bulls, Oct 21
  3. Win against TB, Oct 22
  4. Loss against Synapse, Oct 24
  5. Loss against CH, Oct 25
1 loss Streak 2 losses
60% Winrate 10 40%
56% Winrate 30 40%
+4 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp 0 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

CyberHero Zero Tenacity
4 Advantage5 common opponents 3

Previous Encounters

CyberHero Zero Tenacity
2 Wins2 meetings 0
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 34–15 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 43–35 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 44–29 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 28–32 kills — Winner: CyberHero

Teams Recent Performance

CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Playoffs Ended HULIGANI, Winner 2 CyberHero 0 Game 1 — —; Game 2 — 34–13 kills — Winner: HULIGANI
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Playoffs Ended Nemiga Gaming 1 CyberHero, Winner 2 Game 1 — 52–36 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 2 — 13–30 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 3 — 13–33 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Playoffs Ended GamerLegion, Winner 2 CyberHero 0 Game 1 — 38–19 kills — Winner: GamerLegion; Game 2 — 32–12 kills — Winner: GamerLegion
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 34–15 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 43–35 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Walkover TheBot$ — CyberHero, Winner
All CyberHero Encounters
Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 34–15 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 43–35 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Team Synapse, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 1 Game 1 — 49–30 kills — Winner: Team Synapse; Game 2 — 35–36 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 51–28 kills — Winner: Team Synapse
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended TheBot$ 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–38 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 22–42 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Dawn Bulls 1 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 33–12 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls; Game 2 — 12–31 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 6–29 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Yellow Submarine, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 24–4 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine; Game 2 — 31–32 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine
All Zero Tenacity Encounters

Other EPL matches

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended TheBot$ 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–38 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 22–42 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended salamit 0 Nemiga Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 11–26 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 2 — 12–24 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Team Synapse, Winner 2 Dawn Bulls 1 Game 1 — 31–11 kills — Winner: Team Synapse; Game 2 — 33–43 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls; Game 3 — 40–42 kills — Winner: Team Synapse
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Team Lynx 0 Nemiga Gaming, Winner 2 Game 1 — 31–37 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 2 — 11–39 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Team Synapse, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 1 Game 1 — 49–30 kills — Winner: Team Synapse; Game 2 — 35–36 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 51–28 kills — Winner: Team Synapse
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Yellow Submarine, Winner 2 Dawn Bulls 0 Game 1 — 25–10 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine; Game 2 — 24–40 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine
All EPL matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
1 week ago
Tournament
2026 EPL Masters III
Stage
Group B
Format
bo3

Login