Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • Dota 2
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 23m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
CyberHero
2:0
Zero Tenacity
  • Game 1 44–29 kills CH
  • Game 2 28–32 kills CH
1394 +17 ENSI.Score, locked for the prediction 1412 −17
47% Win probability 53%

Locked before the match

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Last meeting · Oct 25, 2026 · CyberHero 2:0

Maps

  1. Game 1 47 minutes 44–29 kills CH won
  2. Game 2 48 minutes 28–32 kills CH won

Player statistics

2 maps with player statistics · Net worth, GPM and XPM are averages of the maps

CyberHero
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
WoERussia Ruban Nikolay Olegovich 2 13 10 26 +3 35,714 73,357 628 848 / 1,111
bb3pxRussia Evdokimychev Nikolay 2 23 7 27 +16 34,816 92,918 600 771 / 1,081
AinkradBelarus Aleksei Diveevskiy 2 22 9 32 +13 29,950 82,869 542 703 / 912
semataryRussia Maksim Kravchenkov 2 7 17 48 -10 15,507 41,015 76 366 / 606
HtrdRussia Andrey Fedorov 2 7 18 31 -11 12,558 23,571 65 345 / 595
Zero Tenacity
Player M K D A +/- NW HD CS GPM/XPM More numbers
NesfeerRussia Kurbanov Magomed 2 13 15 20 -2 27,858 66,505 644 713 / 762
NefritUkraine Dmitry Tarasich 2 21 13 20 +8 23,879 63,140 394 584 / 787
arcane fantasyRussia Daniil Ivanov 2 12 10 34 +2 21,639 74,500 432 539 / 728
rare godsInternational 2 11 15 35 -4 15,742 45,312 155 394 / 622
HduoUkraine Ilya Deriglazov 2 4 19 32 -15 9,403 38,219 41 298 / 417

M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · NW — Net Worth · HD — Hero Damage · CS — Creep kills · GPM/XPM — Gold and experience per minute

Lineups

CyberHero

Zero Tenacity

Did not play this match

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

CyberHero Now Zero Tenacity
  1. Win against Synapse, Oct 18
  2. Loss against Bulls, Oct 19
  3. Win against YeS, Oct 22
  4. Win against TB, Oct 24
  5. Win against Z10, Oct 25
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against YeS, Oct 19
  2. Win against Bulls, Oct 21
  3. Win against TB, Oct 22
  4. Loss against Synapse, Oct 24
  5. Loss against CH, Oct 25
3 wins Streak 2 losses
60% Winrate 10 40%
62% Winrate 30 40%
−2 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp 0 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

CyberHero Zero Tenacity
4 Advantage5 common opponents 3

Previous Encounters

CyberHero Zero Tenacity
2 Wins2 meetings 0
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 34–15 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 43–35 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 44–29 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 28–32 kills — Winner: CyberHero

Teams Recent Performance

CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 34–15 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 43–35 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Walkover TheBot$ — CyberHero, Winner
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Yellow Submarine 0 Game 1 — 48–26 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 36–16 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Dawn Bulls, Winner 2 CyberHero 0 Game 1 — 26–5 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls; Game 2 — 35–27 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Team Synapse 1 Game 1 — 43–33 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 16–39 kills — Winner: Team Synapse; Game 3 — 65–41 kills — Winner: CyberHero
All CyberHero Encounters
Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended CyberHero, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 34–15 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 43–35 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Team Synapse, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 1 Game 1 — 49–30 kills — Winner: Team Synapse; Game 2 — 35–36 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 51–28 kills — Winner: Team Synapse
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended TheBot$ 0 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–38 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 22–42 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Dawn Bulls 1 Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 Game 1 — 33–12 kills — Winner: Dawn Bulls; Game 2 — 12–31 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 3 — 6–29 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Group Stage Ended Yellow Submarine, Winner 2 Zero Tenacity 0 Game 1 — 24–4 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine; Game 2 — 31–32 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine
All Zero Tenacity Encounters

Other EPL matches

Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Team Spirit Academy, Winner 2 salamit 0 Game 1 — 37–26 kills — Winner: Team Spirit Academy; Game 2 — —
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Zero Tenacity, Winner 2 PuckChamp 0 Game 1 — 30–6 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity; Game 2 — 36–17 kills — Winner: Zero Tenacity
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended PuckChamp, Winner 2 Mena Warriors 0 Game 1 — 30–30 kills — Winner: PuckChamp; Game 2 — 34–29 kills — Winner: PuckChamp
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Mena Warriors 0 CyberHero, Winner 2 Game 1 — 47–42 kills — Winner: CyberHero; Game 2 — 28–42 kills — Winner: CyberHero
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended Nemiga Gaming, Winner 2 Team Spirit Academy 0 Game 1 — 21–13 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming; Game 2 — 29–10 kills — Winner: Nemiga Gaming
Dota 2 T2 bo3 EPL Play-In Ended salamit 1 Yellow Submarine, Winner 2 Game 1 — 10–32 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine; Game 2 — 46–33 kills — Winner: salamit; Game 3 — 44–33 kills — Winner: Yellow Submarine
All EPL matches
Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
2 weeks ago
Tournament
2026 EPL Masters III
Stage
Group A
Format
bo3

Login