Skip to content

Feedback

The address of this page is sent with your message.
  • T2
  • LoL
  • bo3
  • Ended
  • Duration 2h 27m
  • Times in GMT+00:00
Wildcard Gaming
0:2
LiT Esports
  • Game 1 10–20 kills LiT
  • Game 2 15–12 kills LiT
1420 −17 ENSI.Score before the match 1396 +17
— Win probabilityNot calculated for this match —

Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is

Maps

  1. Game 1 10–20 kills LiT won
  2. Game 2 15–12 kills LiT won

No player statistics for this match in our sources.

Lineups

Wildcard Gaming

LiT Esports

Advertisement

Teams Comparison

Wildcard Gaming Now LiT Esports
  1. Win against FEAR, Feb 24
  2. Win against AOE, Mar 04
  3. Loss against SN, Mar 09
  4. Loss against FEAR, Mar 15
  5. Loss against AOE, Mar 17
 Formlast 5
  1. Loss against AOE, Feb 17
  2. Loss against FLY.NZXT, Feb 18
  3. Loss against MU, Feb 26
  4. Loss against DSG, Mar 04
  5. Loss against TLC, Mar 10
3 losses Streak 6 losses
30% Winrate 10 22%
33% Winrate 30 22%
−3 pp Form vs usual last 10 against last 30, pp 0 pp

Encounters with common opponents 60 days

Wildcard Gaming LiT Esports

Teams had no common opponents

Previous Encounters

Wildcard Gaming LiT Esports
0 Wins1 meeting 1
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming 0 LiT Esports, Winner 2 Game 1 — 10–20 kills — Winner: LiT Esports; Game 2 — 15–12 kills — Winner: LiT Esports

Teams Recent Performance

Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Area of Effect Esports, Winner 2 Wildcard Gaming 0 Game 1 — 23–7 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 2 — 22–10 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Playoffs Ended Wildcard Gaming 1 Cincinnati Fear, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–22 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 14–5 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 3 — 20–19 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming 0 Supernova, Winner 2 Game 1 — 18–26 kills — Winner: Supernova; Game 2 — 8–28 kills — Winner: Supernova
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming, Winner 2 Area of Effect Esports 1 Game 1 — 18–9 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 2 — 6–16 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 3 — 15–14 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming, Winner 2 Cincinnati Fear 0 Game 1 — 24–17 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 2 — 26–18 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming
All Wildcard Gaming Encounters
LiT Esports
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Team Liquid Challengers, Winner 2 LiT Esports 0 Game 1 — 10–3 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers; Game 2 — 30–10 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended LiT Esports 1 Disguised, Winner 2 Game 1 — 8–21 kills — Winner: Disguised; Game 2 — 21–3 kills — Winner: LiT Esports; Game 3 — 19–24 kills — Winner: Disguised
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Maryville University, Winner 2 LiT Esports 0 Game 1 — 27–9 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 41–15 kills — Winner: Maryville University
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended LiT Esports 0 FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Game 1 — 8–24 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 9–21 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended LiT Esports 0 Area of Effect Esports, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–20 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 2 — 11–24 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports
All LiT Esports Encounters

Other NACL matches

LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Maryville University, Winner 2 Disguised 0 Game 1 — 30–14 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 21–12 kills — Winner: Maryville University
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Team Liquid Challengers 1 Supernova, Winner 2 Game 1 — 20–5 kills — Winner: Team Liquid Challengers; Game 2 — 9–26 kills — Winner: Supernova; Game 3 — 15–24 kills — Winner: Supernova
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Wildcard Gaming 1 FlyQuest NZXT, Winner 2 Game 1 — 13–29 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT; Game 2 — 28–18 kills — Winner: Wildcard Gaming; Game 3 — 8–28 kills — Winner: FlyQuest NZXT
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Mirage Alliance 0 Maryville University, Winner 2 Game 1 — 9–20 kills — Winner: Maryville University; Game 2 — 10–18 kills — Winner: Maryville University
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended LiT Esports 1 Cincinnati Fear, Winner 2 Game 1 — 3–13 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear; Game 2 — 16–7 kills — Winner: LiT Esports; Game 3 — 18–25 kills — Winner: Cincinnati Fear
LoL T2 bo3 NACL Group Stage Ended Mirage Alliance, Winner 2 Area of Effect Esports 1 Game 1 — 12–18 kills — Winner: Area of Effect Esports; Game 2 — 23–10 kills — Winner: Mirage Alliance; Game 3 — 24–5 kills — Winner: Mirage Alliance
All NACL matches

Match VOD

Found on YouTube by the name of this match

  • Analyst Breaks Down Week 3 Of NACL Spring Split!

    Analyst Breaks Down Week 3 Of NACL Spring Split!

    SuperKmanrocks 5 views

Advertisement

About the match

Played on
GMT+00:00
2 years ago
Tournament
2024 North America Challengers League Spring
Stage
Round Robin
Format
bo3

Login