- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 1h 48m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Dust2 13:7 Na'Vi
- Ancient 13:9 Na'Vi
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
HOTU
Inferno
ban
-
Na'Vi
Overpass
ban
-
HOTU
Dust2
pick
-
Na'Vi
Ancient
pick
-
HOTU
Nuke
ban
-
Na'Vi
Anubis
ban
- — Mirage decider
-
Dust2
Pick: HOTU
45 minutes
13:7
Na'Vi won
1st half 8–4
2nd half 5–3
-
Ancient
Pick: Na'Vi
46 minutes
13:9
Na'Vi won
1st half 9–3
2nd half 4–6
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale2 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 43 | 26 | 7 | +17 | 42% | 104 | 83% | 8.08 | 11-1 | 5-7 | |
|
|
2 | 40 | 24 | 7 | +16 | 43% | 97 | 79% | 7.33 | 6-4 | 8-3 | |
|
|
2 | 33 | 23 | 12 | +10 | 58% | 88 | 76% | 6.84 | 5-1 | 3-5 | |
|
|
2 | 28 | 20 | 9 | +8 | 36% | 71 | 79% | 6.37 | 4-1 | 4-5 | |
|
|
2 | 23 | 26 | 13 | -3 | 48% | 68 | 79% | 5.55 | 3-6 | 3-8 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 33 | 32 | 9 | +1 | 67% | 93 | 62% | 6.45 | 2-4 | 7-5 | |
|
|
2 | 27 | 32 | 7 | -5 | 63% | 63 | 62% | 5.75 | 3-4 | 6-5 | |
|
|
2 | 22 | 36 | 8 | -14 | 32% | 67 | 55% | 5.00 | 3-9 | 6-7 | |
|
|
2 | 20 | 36 | 5 | -16 | 65% | 63 | 55% | 4.91 | 3-8 | 6-8 | |
|
|
2 | 15 | 31 | 5 | -16 | 40% | 43 | 52% | 4.45 | 2-4 | 3-4 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20 | 11 | 2 | +9 | 70% | 106 | 90% | 7.76 | 4-0 | 1-1 | 15% | |
|
|
17 | 7 | 3 | +10 | 35% | 82 | 85% | 7.28 | 4-1 | 3-1 | 26% | |
|
|
17 | 11 | 1 | +6 | 59% | 88 | 75% | 7.23 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 16% | |
|
|
15 | 8 | 8 | +7 | 60% | 94 | 80% | 6.85 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 14% | |
|
|
11 | 9 | 6 | +2 | 55% | 57 | 85% | 5.51 | 1-3 | 0-3 | 20% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
11 | 17 | 3 | -6 | 45% | 76 | 45% | 5.60 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 25% | |
|
|
9 | 16 | 3 | -7 | 89% | 63 | 45% | 4.85 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 24% | |
|
|
11 | 16 | 3 | -5 | 73% | 52 | 60% | 4.80 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 20% | |
|
|
7 | 14 | 3 | -7 | 14% | 45 | 55% | 4.64 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 17% | |
|
|
8 | 17 | 0 | -9 | 63% | 48 | 45% | 4.32 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 24% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23 | 15 | 5 | +8 | 17% | 103 | 77% | 8.37 | 7-1 | 4-6 | 21% | |
|
|
23 | 13 | 6 | +10 | 30% | 106 | 82% | 7.43 | 2-4 | 6-1 | 17% | |
|
|
18 | 15 | 4 | +3 | 56% | 82 | 73% | 6.83 | 3-0 | 2-4 | 24% | |
|
|
12 | 17 | 7 | -5 | 42% | 79 | 73% | 5.59 | 2-3 | 3-5 | 23% | |
|
|
11 | 13 | 6 | -2 | 36% | 60 | 73% | 5.54 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 23% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24 | 16 | 6 | +8 | 58% | 120 | 77% | 7.91 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 24% | |
|
|
16 | 16 | 4 | +0 | 56% | 74 | 64% | 6.62 | 3-0 | 4-3 | 17% | |
|
|
12 | 19 | 5 | -7 | 67% | 76 | 64% | 5.44 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 15% | |
|
|
11 | 19 | 5 | -8 | 18% | 59 | 64% | 4.45 | 1-6 | 3-4 | 21% | |
|
|
8 | 17 | 2 | -9 | 63% | 42 | 50% | 4.28 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 17% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Win against G2, Oct 03
- Loss against Vitality, Oct 04
- Win against 9z, Oct 05
- Loss against Falcons, Oct 06
- Loss against PARIVISION, Oct 07
- Win against REF, Sep 29
- Win against BP, Sep 29
- Loss against Nemesis, Oct 01
- Win against STATE, Oct 07
- Win against Acend, Oct 09
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Wins: 1
paiN Gaming
Wins: 1
-
Wins: 1
3DMAX
Loses: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other IEM matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
IEM RIO 2026 - G2 Esports vs 3DMax | NaVi vs HOTU
-
HIGHLIGHTS 👉NAVI проти HOTU | IEM Rio 2026
-
ПРОИГРАВШИЙ ВЫБЫВАЕТ! NAVI vs HOTU - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - IEM Rio 2026 l КС2
-
ПРОИГРАВШИЙ ВЫБЫВАЕТ! B8 vs Aurora - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ - IEM Rio 2026 l КС2
-
NaVi vs HOTU - IEM Rio 2026 - ЛУЧШИЕ МОМЕНТЫ CS2 | КРИВОЙ ЭФИР
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 5 months ago
- Tournament
- 2025 Intel Extreme Masters Rio
- Stage
- Group B
- Format
- bo3