- T1
- CS2
- bo3
- Ended
- Duration 1h 43m
- Times in GMT+00:00
- Cache 6:13 K27
- Nuke 6:13 K27
Calculated by ENSI.Score with the Elo formula, not reported by the organiser. How accurate it is
Maps
Map Veto
7 steps, in order-
K27
Inferno
ban
-
MIBR
Dust2
ban
-
K27
Cache
pick
-
MIBR
Nuke
pick
-
K27
Anubis
ban
-
MIBR
Mirage
ban
- — Ancient decider
-
Cache
Pick: K27
44 minutes
6:13
K27 won
1st half 4–8
2nd half 2–5
-
Nuke
Pick: MIBR
36 minutes
6:13
K27 won
1st half 3–9
2nd half 3–4
Player statistics
Rating: bo3.gg, 10-point scale2 maps with player statistics · ADR, KAST and rating are means weighted by the rounds of each map
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 21 | 27 | 5 | -6 | 62% | 61 | 66% | 5.73 | 3-3 | 3-4 | |
|
|
2 | 24 | 28 | 5 | -4 | 58% | 75 | 66% | 5.56 | 6-9 | 5-4 | |
|
|
2 | 24 | 31 | 3 | -7 | 58% | 68 | 68% | 5.33 | 4-6 | 5-4 | |
|
|
2 | 20 | 28 | 7 | -8 | 65% | 60 | 63% | 5.20 | 0-3 | 4-7 | |
|
|
2 | 16 | 25 | 11 | -9 | 31% | 60 | 66% | 5.20 | 1-3 | 3-3 |
| Player | M | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2 | 30 | 18 | 10 | +12 | 43% | 86 | 89% | 7.19 | 4-0 | 5-3 | |
|
|
2 | 32 | 21 | 4 | +11 | 53% | 81 | 71% | 7.15 | 12-5 | 5-2 | |
|
|
2 | 29 | 20 | 7 | +9 | 69% | 84 | 79% | 6.48 | 2-2 | 6-4 | |
|
|
2 | 22 | 21 | 13 | +1 | 59% | 71 | 76% | 5.98 | 4-4 | 6-7 | |
|
|
2 | 24 | 27 | 6 | -3 | 42% | 66 | 76% | 5.94 | 2-3 | 4-13 |
M — Maps played · K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
15 | 14 | 3 | +1 | 53% | 93 | 74% | 6.51 | 4-4 | 2-3 | 21% | |
|
|
8 | 10 | 6 | -2 | 38% | 61 | 74% | 5.51 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 29% | |
|
|
10 | 13 | 1 | -3 | 60% | 57 | 63% | 5.43 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 11% | |
|
|
10 | 12 | 2 | -2 | 70% | 51 | 58% | 4.87 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 16% | |
|
|
10 | 15 | 2 | -5 | 50% | 61 | 68% | 4.75 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 13% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18 | 11 | 2 | +7 | 72% | 89 | 74% | 7.73 | 5-1 | 3-1 | 19% | |
|
|
16 | 9 | 5 | +7 | 63% | 84 | 95% | 7.22 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 19% | |
|
|
13 | 10 | 3 | +3 | 69% | 80 | 79% | 6.22 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 12% | |
|
|
10 | 11 | 8 | -1 | 70% | 78 | 68% | 5.92 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 12% | |
|
|
5 | 13 | 3 | -8 | 60% | 32 | 68% | 4.32 | 1-2 | 0-6 | 11% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Sides: CT T
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
11 | 14 | 4 | -3 | 64% | 64 | 68% | 6.03 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 17% | |
|
|
14 | 16 | 1 | -2 | 64% | 76 | 68% | 5.91 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 22% | |
|
|
10 | 16 | 5 | -6 | 60% | 70 | 68% | 5.53 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 22% | |
|
|
8 | 15 | 5 | -7 | 25% | 59 | 58% | 4.89 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 17% | |
|
|
9 | 14 | 2 | -5 | 67% | 57 | 58% | 4.61 | 2-5 | 3-1 | 26% |
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | HS | ADR | KAST | Rtg | OP | TR | Acc | More numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19 | 14 | 3 | +5 | 37% | 101 | 84% | 7.55 | 1-1 | 4-7 | 19% | |
|
|
14 | 9 | 5 | +5 | 21% | 89 | 84% | 7.15 | 3-0 | 2-2 | 22% | |
|
|
16 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 69% | 87 | 79% | 6.73 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 12% | |
|
|
14 | 10 | 2 | +4 | 29% | 73 | 68% | 6.56 | 7-4 | 2-1 | 20% | |
|
|
12 | 10 | 5 | +2 | 50% | 64 | 84% | 6.04 | 1-0 | 4-5 | 23% |
K — Kills · D — Deaths · A — Assists · +/- — Kills minus deaths · HS — Headshots · ADR — Average damage per round · KAST — Rounds with a kill, assist, survival or trade · Rtg — Rating · OP — Opening kills and opening deaths · TR — Trade kills and traded deaths · Acc — Accuracy
Lineups
Teams Comparison
- Loss against Legacy, Sep 12
- Loss against FURIA, Sep 17
- Win against magic, Sep 18
- Win against NRG, Sep 19
- Loss against FURIA, Sep 19
- Win against PVT, Oct 01
- Win against UPGRADE, Oct 02
- Win against Nemesis, Oct 02
- Win against Metz, Oct 07
- Loss against FNC, Oct 09
Encounters with common opponents 60 days
-
Loses: 1
Eternal Fire
Loses: 2
-
Wins: 1
magic
Loses: 1
-
Wins: 1
EYEBALLERS
Wins: 1
Previous Encounters
Teams Recent Performance
Other IEM matches
Match VOD
Found on YouTube by the name of this match
-
MIBR vs K27 | Intel Extreme Masters Beijing 2026: Global Qualifier | Resumo da Partida #shorts
About the match
- Played on
- GMT+00:00
- 1 month ago
- Tournament
- 2026 Intel Extreme Masters China
- Stage
- Closed Qualifier
- Format
- bo3